Republican senators accuse Obama administration of 'stonewalling' on Benghazi

Women dont have a right to snuff out another human being sorry.

the Libya BS?? Like Obama in the debate claiming he said it was terrorism the very next day after the attacks....yet the same administration still talking about the video to the UN and here at home for weeks afterwards? Which story is it Montoya?

As to the evidence, why isnt it being released then? Why is Obama asked bluntly and directly if the request for help was Denied...and he avoids answering?

Which workers rights? Please explain this.

I have never made one claim about Social Security. You are confusing me with someone else...or youre just making (*)(*)(*)(*) up in lieu of knowing anything.

Link that please, it's outright BS.I have no idea what you are talking about.

I do?? I like Sarah Palin sure...Bachmann? Couldnt give a toss about her either way.

You are just making (*)(*)(*)(*) up to cover for the obvious fact that you dont know what you are talking about. Good lord, people like you are actually voting....

 

Then lock up every (*)(*)(*)(*)ed one of them, throwing away the key.

And make sure that the Otraitor is paired in a cell with a big hairy dude named "Guido", who is serving life without parole, and loves to make punks like the Otraitor his "biaaatch".

 

You're letting yourself get involved in a thread derailment.

If she wants to talk about subjects other then Benghazi then she can start a thread about them.

 

Originally Posted by Montoya
Its funny to watch the extremists squirm over a non-issue no one cares about.

Let him go on about it. It keeps him off the streets and away from the kiddies.

 

You're right, was not my intent at all. My apologies. Going to bow out.

 

Women do not have the right to choose to kill unborn babies any more than you have the right to rape little boys.

 

The Otraitor has to stonewall, or else practice taking the 5th.

 

You're right but since abortion doesnt kill a baby we are ok.

 

Where was Obama during the Benghazi attack and what did he order himself?

 

[video=youtube;znVqyfxfbRQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znVqyfxfbRQ[/video]

 

Wow, what a surprise!!! The hardest left leaning poster on the board supports Obama even when he is covering up leaving Americans to die. Big shock!!!

You would defend him if he was caught on video ripping heads off of babies and drinking their blood like it was beer...

 

(*)(*)(*)(*)ing pathetic Kool Aid drinking Obama-bots support the murder of innocent Americans, you have to ask yourself, why?

 

Google "late term abortion" sometime and see just how much "abortion doesnt kill a baby". The skull of the very-much living baby (or, as hyperlibs would have it -- "a collection of cells") is crushed, and the baby (collection of cells) is pulled out of the mother (or, as hyperlibs would have it -- "the woman"), and then everybody "has a nice day".

"The stars are not for man."
Arthur C. Clarke, "Childhood's End"

 

Read the EXCELLENT Benghazi Timeline at factcheck.org


9-11-2012

A very important 4 hour period!!!

**************************************

4:00 p.m. EDT - attack on compound commences.

6:07 p.m.: The State Department’s Operations Center sends an email to the White House, Pentagon, FBI, and other government agencies that said Ansar al-Sharia has claimed credit for the attack on its Facebook and Twitter accounts. (The existence of the email was not disclosed until Reuters reported it on Oct. 24.)

About 8:30 p.m.: Libyan security forces were able to assist us in regaining control of the situation.

***************************************

Within hours, administration blaming the video:

10:00 p.m.: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton issues a statement confirming that one State official was killed in an attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. Her statement, which MSNBC posted at 10:32 p.m., made reference to the anti-Muslim video.

Clinton: Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

​

The White House continued to deny it was a "terrorist attack" until Sept 19. The next day WH spokesman Jay Carney finally admits the fact on Sept 20. The WH's persistent denial contradicted Libya President Mohamed Magariafi as well Defense Secretary Leon Panetta (in a meeting with the Senate Armed Services Committee).

Sept. 19: Matt Olsen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, tells a Senate subcommittee (at 1:06:49 in the video) that the four State Department officials in Benghazi “were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy.” It is the first time an administration official labeled it a “terrorist attack.” But he also tells the senators that he has no “specific evidence of significant advanced planning.”

Sept. 20: Carney calls it a “terrorist attack” after being asked how the White House now classifies the attack.

And on and on the denial and coverup goes... Obama still doesn't refer to it as planned or as a terrorist attack, continuing to blame the attack on the video.

 

Ouch, good post Mr D, it is sickening to know that Obama the failed leader and his libturd loon lemmings endorse and support the murder of Americans

 

Thank you! Coming from the Annenberg Foundation (!) this is especially compelling. They try to cover their tracks a bit with a disclaimer saying that they cannot prove "intent" on the part of the Obama regime to deceive, but the facts are the facts. Where are Obama's lapdog ass-kissers, the hyperlib news media? Toiling away at digging up whatever "dirt" they think they can find on Romney, of course... -- "So, you're denying that he had bully tendencies in high school?!"

It would almost be funny and entertaining to watch these deceitful, slimy Libocrat bastards squirm in their own lies if it weren't for the fact that, thanks to their unbelievably callous incompetency, four Americans were murdered while they were busy campaigning for their "messiah" to be re-elected. It staggers me to think that there is anybody left in this country who could vote for Barack Obama. In his own way, he's EXACTLY the same kind of lying, deceitful bastard that Richard Nixon was... but at least nobody got killed because of the Watergate scandal....

 

Not to worry! Media or no media, there is smoke and rumbling under yon mountain and should that volcano blow, it's all she wrote for some very influential and culpable fraudsters.

 

In a perverse way, it would almost make it worthwhile to see Obama get re-elected... and then impeached and removed from office for the "high crimes and misdemeanors" of dereliction of duty and malfeasance, and then -- worse -- lying about the whole **** thing to cover it up. Think about it: if Obama is merely defeated in the upcoming election, he could still run for the presidency again in 2016, and we would be at risk of having this thing back in the White House. If he's impeached and removed then he's gone for good!

It is interesting to see how closely the Benghazi Stonewalling resembles Nixon's Watergate Stonewalling. The difference? Back then, the liberal news media absolutely FEASTED on the Nixon Administration's lies and deceit, and were very instrumental in forcing Nixon to resign. Today's hyperlib Obama-buttkissers in the media are trying their best to completely ignore the whole thing, hoping that the dumbed-down American "cattle" forget it ever happened before they vote next week....