Republicans caught lying about Hillary

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Pardy, Jul 7, 2015.

  1. Pardy

    Pardy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Messages:
    10,437
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Representative Elijah E. Cummings, Ranking Member of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, sent a letter to Chairman Trey Gowdy warning: "It now appears that someone who was given access to the Select Committee's documents leaked doctored information to the press in order to make unsubstantiated allegations against Secretary Clinton."

    Rep. Cummings explains in a letter send to Rep. Gowdy:


    Dear Mr. Chairman:

    Documents released recently by the Benghazi Select Committee demonstrate that a Member of the Committee, a staffer on the Committee, or someone who has been given access to the Committee’s documents inaccurately described to the press email exchanges obtained by the Committee in a way that appeared to further a political attack against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

    [...]

    The emails were not included in documents originally turned over by the State Department.

    Now that the emails quoted in this story have been released, it is clear that this source provided the following inaccurate information:

    First, the source claimed that Secretary Clinton wrote “Thanks, I’m pushing to WH” in response to an email from Mr. Blumenthal on October 10. In fact, she did not make that statement in response to this email. Secretary Clinton was responding to a completely different email more than a week earlier, on October 1.

    Second, the source claimed that Secretary Clinton was responding to a suggestion from Mr. Blumenthal that Philippe Reines circulate links to four Media Matters articles that refuted the way the “right-wing media” was covering Republican statements about the Benghazi attacks. In fact, Secretary Clinton was responding to an email from Mr. Blumenthal forwarding an article from Salon.com reporting that Republicans were planning to claim inaccurately during the presidential debates that the White House had advance knowledge about the Benghazi attacks and failed to act on it. The article included no reference to Mr. Reines at all.

    Read more here: http://www.politicususa.com/2015/07/06/democrats-bust-republicans-press-phony-benghazi-emails.html

    My take:

    This Benghazi "scandal" orchestrators are getting desperate because it's the last shot that the GOP has at getting Hillary. This is because it's not about justice but taking down the competition. Gowdy is a fraud leading a kangaroo court. He uses the bench to yell at conservatives and government employees.

    It turns out that Hillary's emails with Blumenthal vindicated her, thus the need to insert false information that suggest that they discussed the Benghazi attacks and failed to respond -- which perpetuates the years-long assertion from Republicans that Hillary didn't care about the Benghazi deaths.
     
  2. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    None of that is true, and hillary violated the law and used a private server for classified emails.

    If hillary had followed the law, all her emails would have been provided by the state, not hillarys discretion.

    Hillarys lies deceit and willful violation of the law, have created this controversy, and no one can dispute that.

    Furthermore, it seems the obama administration was obviously complicit with hillarys national security breach as well as the deletion of subpenaed emails from the IRS.

    obama promise of transparency in his administration has been repeated proven to be just another lie in a steady stream of lies spewed forth.

    The American people arent stupid enough to believe this bullcrap, which why only hillarys personal media outlet will spew them. aka Media Matters.
     
  3. Pardy

    Pardy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Messages:
    10,437
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    These mischaracterized emails were published by Politico, but were sent to Politico from Trey Gowdy's team. Politico wrote a correction and not an apology to Hillary for posting these lies from Gowdy's team. Meanwhile, Gowdy is expected to remain quiet about this real scandal, and focus on his fake Benghazi scandal.
     
  4. Ivan88

    Ivan88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,908
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    "There is not a dime's worth of difference between the Democrats and the Republicans." George Wallace
    [​IMG]
     
  5. Pardy

    Pardy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Messages:
    10,437
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Would you like another source? How about this one:

    From http://www.ibtimes.com/false-info-a...eaked-press-benghazi-committee-member-1996985

    "Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., denounced the House Select Committee on Benghazi as well as news site Politico Monday for leaking inaccurate emails in an effort to undermine former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. In a letter, sent to Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., and published here, Cummings, the panel's ranking Democrat, raises concerns about multiple mischaracterizations of Clinton's messages and calls for greater security."


    Which reminds me of another lie that came from Gowdy's corrupt kangaroo court. They said that Hillary used multiple private email accounts when in truth she only used one.

    I see. So if somebody allegedly breaks the law, Republicans are allowed to lie all they want?

    Proof please. You don't have any, but I have to ask for evidence.

    Gowdy's team has lied out their wazoo during an official legal ivestiation, yet you dismiss it and choose to focus on a vague law.
     
  6. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Any "mischaracterizations" that may have occurred are a direct result of hillarys willful violation of US Federal Law, by utilizing a private email server, and deleting her own emails.

    Every single one of your assumptions is based on believing what hillarys claims. If hillary wanted to be trusted, she wouldnt have violated the law in the first place.

    and as for your proof demands, lol

    Every email that has ever been sent in the history of the world has a To: segment and a From: segment, and none of her emails are From: State.gov.

    Every retard who has ever used email, knows this. Are you suggesting obama is dumber than a retard?





    Clinton Email Domain Hosted by a Company That Was Hacked in 2010 and Had Data Redirected to Ukraine — and IP Address Reveals Link to British Virgin Islands

    Domain history data reveals Clintonemail.com was registered in 2009 with Network Solutions, shortly after Clinton was appointed as the nation’s top diplomat. But the decision to host the domain for such a high-profile person on a consumer registrar like Network Solutions is questionable to security experts.

    Bill Sweetman, a domain registration expert based in Canada who describes himself as part of the “left-leaning camp,” told TheBlaze Friday that the whole Clinton email controversy has struck him as “naive on the part of the players.”

    “If you’re someone that is concerned about security of your data, you don’t go and register your domain name with a consumer-oriented registrar like Network Solutions or GoDaddy,” Sweetman said.
     
  7. Gorn Captain

    Gorn Captain Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Messages:
    35,580
    Likes Received:
    237
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gowdy's going to end up, at the end, trying this line-

    "We didn't find a smoking gun...but lots of questions are still unanswered."


    And all the Benghazi-gaters on the Right will insist that his "findings" are "utterly devastating to Hillary and will stop her from winning in November 2016."

    Later, if she does win in November 2016?...they'll then claim that the "findings" are "utterly devastating to Hillary and could still lead to her being impeached in 2018!!!!"


    Naturally, they will NEVER admit they were wrong, dishonest, etc. Perhaps at some point, they'll simply turn on Trey Gowdy and call him an idiot for "not producing clear prosecutable evidence"....

    but they'll never admit there was no "there" there. They can't now. Even if their partisanship allowed them. Their poor, fragile egos can never admit it.
     
  8. katzgar

    katzgar Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    113



    this post is about Benghazi and you get hysterical about everything else. not rational, not rational at all.
     
  9. Pardy

    Pardy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Messages:
    10,437
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Well, by "mischaracterizations", I mean lies. These were intentionally-altered documents sent out from Gowdy's team. This has nothing to do with Hillary's email server.

    No, they're based on truth. They're based on reality. Facts are inconvenient for the far Right.

    What violation of law has Hillary been charged with? Again, facts aren't convenient for you.



    So? She never claimed otherwise.

    Typical ultraconservative response. You lose an argument so you have to get personal.
     
  10. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Perhaps you should have harry reid look into these alleged lies.....

    LOL

    Obama is tasked with enforcing the law, ask him why he isnt doing his job..... oh wait, thats right, obama knew all about it and is complicit.

    Personal? I assume obama is smarter than a retard, its you who is claiming he isnt.
     
  11. Pardy

    Pardy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Messages:
    10,437
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    The IRS, Obama, Harry Reid. Your deflections suggest that you ain't got nothin'.

    And these lies aren't alleged. This happened. Gowdy needs to publicly apologize.
     
  12. RPA1

    RPA1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    22,806
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, Hillary is excellent at throwing up smokescreens...Watch the liberals clamor to her like little lemmings now claiming she was somehow violated....She has more public faces and the 7 faces of Dr. Lao.
     
  13. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    lol the funny thing is shes far more to the center and shes currently lying to the left to get the nomination. She doesnt start lying to the right until after the primaries.
     
  14. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You should start a comedy routine. Youre really funny
     
  15. Pardy

    Pardy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Messages:
    10,437
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    How is a public smear campaign not a violation?

    Republicans have said that she issued a stand down order, that her emails were hacked by Russians, that she didn't care about the deaths of Americans in Benghazi, and all kinds of other nonsense. It's childish and desperate.

    What is so comical about exposing Republican lies? Gowdy's committee was a farce from day one, and it's truly hilarious.

    And he likely won't apologize to Hillary Clinton. He's a sleezy as he looks.

    They'll move on to their next fake scandal. I think this is the 12th Benghazi inquiry. They're doing anything and everything to take Hillary down. It's not about dead Americans. It's about taking out Hillary.

    I hope Americans never forget how childish the GOP is being, and how low they'll stoop to take out a rival. Using Congress to do this makes it even more egregious.
     
  16. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    lol

    Lets take a look at Hillarys campaign slogan......
    [video=youtube;4B7dZReimPI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4B7dZReimPI[/video]
     
  17. junius. fils

    junius. fils New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2010
    Messages:
    5,270
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Delete all after lying. Change to read "as usual."
     
  18. ballantine

    ballantine Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    5,297
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Amazing.

    You know, if Hillary had turned over the e-mails in the first place, as she was required by law to do, then none of this would have happened.
     
  19. Pardy

    Pardy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Messages:
    10,437
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    This latest claim reminds me of the Republican lie about Hillary's alleged "stand down" order. There was no stand down order, but that didn't stop her detractors from promoting the lie. America will get wise soon enough.


    Like I said, that's all you've got.
     
  20. ballantine

    ballantine Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    5,297
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    None of this changes the fact that Hillary broke the law.

    She was required by law to turn over the e-mails, and she didn't.

    Not only that, but the evidence is clear that of the ones she did turn over, she deliberately edited some of the e-mails before turning them over. Which makes her a federal felon. That's Obstruction of Justice, and it's a High Crime and Misdemeanor and it qualifies for impeachment by anyone's standards. Therefore, if she ever does get to the White House, she should be immediately impeached. There's already enough evidence to make that stick.
     
  21. Pardy

    Pardy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Messages:
    10,437
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Which law did she allegedly break now?

    LOL.
     
  22. whatukno

    whatukno New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2015
    Messages:
    1,249
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What? Republicans lie sometimes? Oh, no, heaven forfend!

    But whatever will they do now that they have been caught red handed lying to the public all this time about Benghazi? Oh that's right, continue to lie about Benghazi and blame Hillary for something she had absolutely no control over.
     
  23. Pardy

    Pardy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Messages:
    10,437
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Which is ironic because Trey Gowdy yells at innocent Democrats. Who's going to yell at him?
     
  24. APACHERAT

    APACHERAT Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    38,026
    Likes Received:
    16,042
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The real story here is the Politico may have gotten it wrong and it's revealed that the Clinton's State Department got their talking points from Media Matters.
    Media Matters ? :roflol: No wonder the entire Middle East is a complete basket case today if members of the Obama administration are relying on Media Matters.

     
  25. whatukno

    whatukno New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2015
    Messages:
    1,249
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What would be the point? This is this election cycle's "Birther" issue. The lunatic fringe has latched onto it with all their might, and they aren't going to let this go no matter what anyone says about the issue. Despite the fact that most of these people have no idea where Benghazi is without googling it. They actually will continue to believe that Obama and Hillary personally went to the embassy stormed it, and personally executed those Americans.

    This is how bad this is, there are actually conservatives out there that believe with all their hearts that Obama and Hillary were the shooters in the Benghazi attack.

    Nothing you, I, or even God itself could convince these people otherwise.
     

Share This Page