Richard Gage demands a better income.

Discussion in '9/11' started by Hannibal, Jul 15, 2011.

  1. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sonny...insult.
    Chinchilla..insult..
    Way smarter comment...insult.


    Mods......instead of threatening folks with opinions that you don't want to see, claiming truth seekers are insulting everyone else...please take note. You can ban the truth but you can't make it fact by omission or deletion.
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Several people witnessed it hitting the building, and you have been shown their testimony.

    Why can't 'truthers' tell the truth?
     
  3. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Specifically....WHO? Who says they SAW 77 hit the Pentagon? Pick one. Any one. Can't wait.
     
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Mike Walter
     
  5. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah, also known as trolling.

    And you're right about 0% of the time, which explains why YOU do indeed have to run away from people.

    What's wrong? Need some backup? Are you struggling on your own trying to win the debate about AA77 hitting the Pentagon?
     
  6. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
  7. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This Mike Walters:

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhRBsYIgZlI"]‪Mike Walters - Pentagon Plane/Missile Controversy‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]

    Here's 193 more. (Excel spreadsheet)

    http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/PentWitnesses.xls

    Here's Isabel James:

    [ame="http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=8936799830625901088&hl=nl"]n_10_16_witness_pent.avi[/ame]
     
  8. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
  9. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Adults guide the conversation;
    Little girls complains about it.

    If I want to talk about 9/11, I do. If I want to point out the seismic differences between two people in the same movement...I do. If I want to illustrate the reasons for your impotence...I do.

    You've agreed with me more than you've agreed with 'fraud, sweed, 10acres and a great many other twoofers little man. Except in your vile disdain for those in power. Those who are powerless often decry those who are in power. You're no different.

    I am 100% right about the major points on 9/11 because the 9/11 Commission Report is right 100% of the time about the major points of 9/11.

    [/quote]
    ????

    No just happily and continuously pointing out the fissures in the "movement" and the resulting reason for absolutely zero progress made by "people" like you.

    Nothing I love more than busting a twoofer across the chops. Hence your whining and bellyaching about "why are you talking about that"? If you have a posting issue, I'll give you a posting tissue to wipe your eyes Nancy.

    I own you.
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Established liar? Just because he doesn't say what you like?

    And Isabel James? and the 192 other witnesses I referenced? All liars?

    Right ....
     
  11. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm not involved in a "movement" with Rtwingfraud or anyone else.

    And? I agree with you when you cherrypick the obvious and indisputable little straw man because you cower away from defending your own statements about the REAL meat of the issue.

    You dwell on the easy stuff personally cherrypicked, based on your list of "major points" like 9/11 happened to be a Teusday and such and yes I agree when you say the sky is blue. Wow a plane crashed.. Yes I agree.. Not interested in that topic frankly.

    Incidentally you said I was WRONG when I agreed with you so perhaps I shouldn't do that.

    I've pointed out the innacuracies about those major points for the whole board to see so you should spend less time putting your hands over your ears and blindfolding yourself so you can't see it and more time actually defending your precious report as it gets systematically dismantled for all to see.

    You're like the bodyguard who stands by not even noticing the guy you're supposed to be protecting is getting stabbed and beat and shot because you're too busy texting into your phone about how you're batting 1000 and how awesome you are.

    I'm not part of any "movement", and what have YOU accomplished again?

    Is that why you've run away from loads of threads with your tail between your legs?
     
  12. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    But, according to you, 'Fraud is 100% wrong. You don't doubt the 4 air craft were hijacked and crashed by terrorists. He does.

    Yet 100% of your petulant whining is pointed at me, Hanny and others; none at her? Why is that sport? Are you afraid of her?


    Earlier you said I was right "0%" of the time. Now you say you agree with me. I guess the chinchilla's brain is too small to keep 2 thoughts in it simultaneously? LOL. The "real meat"...what time VP Cheney arrived at a room is the "meat" of the issue there sparky? Not who hijacked planes, who was at the controls when they crahsed them? Your argument is with the losers and cokeheads on your side of the argument; not us.


    Was that supposed to be something close to a cogent analogy?


    Just like battering the holy (*)(*)(*)(*) out of you like a ping pong ball. You make it easy.

    Once I prove you wrong like I proved you to be a liar about the "book" that talked about President Bush outside of BTW...like I proved flight 93 wasn't shot down....like I proved your ideas about any number of things to be flat out wrong...once I take the kill shot, I usually don't hang around for a victory lap.

    All your "argument" and "movement" will devolve into is this:

    You hate the country and the leaders and think they are all liars.

    It's all your opinion and malice. I choose not to revel in it at times and other times relish just slapping you around. Depends on my mood. You've scored no points...otherwise you wouldn't be nipping at my heels like a chinchilla.

    Poor baby.
     
  13. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you're saying because we think DIFFERENT things we must be in the same movement?

    Again, I'm not in any "movement" and me believing something different than Rtwingafraud doesn't show otherwise.

    Call for backup all you want to deal with Rtwing.. If you can't handle it, then your problem.

    As for me, I'll post whatever I want, address whatever points I want and speak to whichever people I want.. You can whine all you want that I don't help you defeat your enemies, but at the end of the day, tough (*)(*)(*)(*), as I'll post what I want to thank you.

    You're right 0% of the time when it comes to the meat of the issue, that is who plotted the attack and why the United States couldn't stop the attack.

    You might occasionally be right when you say that grass is green and airplanes have wings on them.

    Wow so the 9/11 victim's families, who wanted to know how the plot was planned and by who and why their government couldn't stop the attacks, are "losers and crackheads".. THEY are the ones who pushed for explaining THIS (not who was at the controls).. You should retract your slander against the victim's families.

    Yes... The entire narrative of the 9/11 commission report has been dismantled and you stood by and watched.

    (by the way, "who was at the controls" isn't the main part of the narrative. If you had even read the report you would know this).

    THAT is your accomplishment?!?!?! :clap:

    bravo!

    You seem to think truthers have accomplished little, and scoff at them for this in order to make yourself feel better. And the TOTAL extent of candycorn's life accomplishments: feigning victory and pretending like he outsmarted someone HE describes as stupid..

    You call me stupid, and your accomplishment in life to make you so much better than the truthers is you pretend to have outsmarted someone you say is stupid.

    Bravo.

    Well done.

    You only proved yourself a liar by claiming the government were the printers of the 9/11 commission report.

    Nipping at your heels like a chinchilla? lol

    In case you didn't notice, I've not called you on your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) in quite some time.. I just let you go on saying it.. Instead, I talk to others, others I think MIGHT one day provide evidence for their claims, something copouts like you simply can't do... And then YOU interrupt and quote me while talking to someone else, to try to get my attention and prod me.

    Then you WHINE and complain like a little school girl because you think your shoes are being nipped at.. Trying to prod for attention off me and then when you get it, (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) about it. Pathetic.

    Take for example this thread.. I wasn't even talking to you.. I was talking to others.. You then quoted me in order to troll, and now you have the audacity and hypocracy to whine about it like YOU are being harrassed!

    Not surprising; you like to whine and misrepresent.

    I tell you what.. Ignore me and I'll ignore you and then you won't have a little "chinchillla" biting at your heels as you put it.. But go ahead and quote me and respond, proving you WANT attention off me.
     
  14. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No...I'm saying that when we disagree, you come out of your cage and start nipping at my heels. When you two disagree, you say nothing...not a word....ever.


    I don't worry about "Fraud he's not a serious commentator and helps my cause by posting his obviously silly points...just pointing out your hypocrisy.

    So when someone disagrees with you on a message board, you pick and choose who you want to take issue with? That is bizarre. But hey, he hurts your movement that you're part of (whether you like it or not) so feel free to remain silent.

    Just pointing out your hypocrisy is enough for me. Nothing I love better than highlighting the fissures in the "movement".


    KSM Plotted the attack. 100% right.
    We couldn't stop it because we were not prepared mentally or stategically. 100% right

    PING!

    No, people like you embody the loser and crackhead community. Ten years later and you're still worrying about what time someone entered a room, the percentage of plane burial, and still flinging nonsense trying to get something to stick (remember the lie about GWB posing for pictures???).


    Well that is so dumb it doesn't require a response....maybe you'll explain it...maybe not. Nobody cares.


    No, I happen to KNOW they have accomplished nothing but giving us a collective group to laugh at.

    Nice to make the personal attack. If only your opinion mattered....to anybody. How sad.

    I don't think I called you stupid. If I did, I was right about that too.

    I was wrong about that. If you want to call it a lie; be my guest.
    You lied about a supposed book--one you can't name--that said GWB posed for pictures outside of the elementary school. You won't admit you lied. But we all know you did.


    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n5E7feJHw0]‪laugh harder‬‏ - YouTube[/ame][/QUOTE]
     
  15. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [/QUOTE]

    I've not got time for this (*)(*)(*)(*).. Three things.. First, regardless how much you like to lie, I don't consider myself part of a "movement" that's why I don't give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about ludicrous claims these other people make. They are NOT choosing which countries to bomb and which people to lock up withOUT their day in court based on such opinions.. These opinions, as wrong as they are, are relatively harmless.. Conversely, locking up people indefinatily without trial is wrong, and is an ugly stain on western democracy. Justifying people being locked up without trial has real consequences is promotion of the first step of the downfall of your civilization. Lizard people from space, that doesn't have any real world consequences.. That's why one fish is a lot bigger so I fry that one. Secondly, we can argue in circles all day.. You keep insisting things are true but fail to show any evidence for it. You're all talk but no substance. Third, the book is called Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism—From Inside the Bush White House, by Bill Sammon.
     
  16. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gee, another lie.


    So you're interested in the "truth" and will take issue those who you think are wrong but ONLY selected people get your commentary. Hypocrisy has never been so vividly clear. You're classic.

    The facts reveal a different story than your opinion there Skippy. The only one crying over KSM's plight is you and a very small minority of those who hate America.

    You're the one responsible for "talking in circles"....why didn't you say that a few months ago when you made your claim? Can you quote the passage?
     
  17. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The lizard man crowd aren't spitting on your democracy.

    The keep the scumbag in jail even though we can't prove he did it crowd like you are indeed spitting on your own country.

    You hate America because you endorse extrajudicial punishment, lack of governmental accountibility and (*)(*)(*)(*) on other inherent qualities of the western democratic ideals it is meant to represent. People like you are a grave threat to your country.. People like you allowed Pearl Harbor to be repeated, and it is people like you who will be to blame when the NEXT 9/11 happens, because you don't care about how hard your leaders work to stop such things when they have the intel to stop them. People like Rtwingafraud don't present such a danger. They don't justify a lack of governmental accountibility.

    THAT is the difference between you people and Rtwingafraud's people.. THAT is why I choose to debate with you guys, because you guys hold the truly dangerous principles. Other claims like lizard people and that, as wrong as they may be, are still harmless.

    I've not got the book on me... I didn't mention it before because what's the point where I got the information from? I admitted it was wrong.. The photo op was indoors not outdoors but what does that matter? How does that change the fact that he CONTINUED taking pictures and even gave a speech while his country was under attack, whether those pictures were indoors or outdoors? I admitted there were none OUTdoors, but doesn't change the fact that there were indoors instead, and while I admit I'm wrong about such a tiny detail, what's it matter where I got the wrong information from?
     
  18. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The main issue has been ignored from the first reply to the OP.

    Gage is not selling anything with this article, he's not speaking or selling a DVD or a book. He's demanding donations.

    "Pay me more or I may have to trim my globetrotting lifestyle."
     
  19. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Obviously that is the twoofer play all along:

    Gage has made a career of 9/11 by stating X, Y, and Z.
    None of the people on the Commission have made a career of 9/11 by stating X, Y, and Z.

    The entire comparison is a non-starter.
     
  20. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, false information supplied by the Commission can only last so long. Eventually you run out of BS that people will believe.
     
  21. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And then what? More excuses from 'truthers'?

    Gage is demanding more money to retain his lifestyle. When will he submit his (five year old) petition?
     
  22. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nobody is forcing anyone to contribute, are they?

    When will the decade old "official" lie be corrected?
     
  23. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you feel it's a lie, you should really do something about it.

    Other than make excuses about it being to difficult, I mean.

    If you really feel 'they' are trying to hold you down, then your inaction means 'they' beat you.

    No one is forcing anyone to contribute to the collection plate in the church of Gage, no. But he does threaten well, doesn't he?
     
  24. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    The professionals have it well under control.
     
  25. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's a good sheep, trust in your leaders. No need to do anything for yourself.
     

Share This Page