Roy Moore And The Dangerous Rise Of Christian Nationalism

of course

 

afraid no, just happy they they are dying out

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/0...rity-to-minority-in-us-population-survey.html

 

You are happy about people dying ?

 

That is the reason why Mosab Hassan Yousef (whose father was one of the founders of Hamas) converted to Christianity. Source "Son of Hamas - A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices" - Mosab Hassan Yousef - 2009.

You might want to do a little homework before making an a$$ of yourself.

 

Conspiracy #275. ..Be afraid, be afraid, be afraid,,,the bogeyman is coming!

 

The Supreme Court just overturned another lefty travesty the other day.

 

Are you incapable of addressing what I say?

 

I have. The universe is existence proof of a higher being. And the golden rule is a fundamental principle of Christianity.

 

Which I refuted.

And many other religions, and for many non religious societies.

Lol

 

You have refuted nothing.

 

The constitution was not founded on Socialist or Communist doctrine.
The constitution was not founded on Muslim and Sharia doctrine.
The constitution was not founded on Atheist values.
The constitution was not founded on altruistic values.
The constitution was not founded as a nationalist doctrine.
The constitution was not founded as a progressive changing document.

The danger I see is from those who wish to take away the rights of the minority states by eliminating the Electoral College.
I find it disturbing to see those who wish to defend illegals in the guise of being sympathetic when in reality is voter power.
I find it atrocious that anarchy and violence are tolerated to shut down free speech.
I find it sad that we have very few legislators that are willing to stand on moral principals and cow-tow to opinion.
I find it a disgrace that society lets thugs and gangs run our cities.
I wonder why so few say anything when corruption raises it's ugly head in our justice department.

Have so many forgot what the Constitution is all about. It is not about any one person or group.

"We the people of the United States, In Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

 

The illiberal progressives don't believe any of this malarkey. The Constitution is a living document which of course means that they believe that we don't have a Constitution.

 

The liberal Founding Fathers would be devastated that you feel such contempt for them and their principles of equal rights for all.

 

Normal, sane, reasonable Christians support homosexuality, gay marriage, abortion, the welfare state and respect for the flag just as liberals do.

It is only the fundamentalist subset of Christians who are opposed to the principles on which this nation was founded.

 

Ironic coming from the side that supports perverts like Roy Moore and the BLOTUS.

 

Without welfare the right would turn America into a 3rd world nation where poverty was rampant.

 

So you are blaming the children for making the "bad choice" to be born into poverty?

 

That "free trade" was a 100% GOP idea and you have been supporting it the entire time.

 

You demonstrate a complete lack of knowledge of history and politics. Only white men have ever had democracies/republics, until white men gave them to people of other races. If it weren't for white men, we'd have no advanced societies, no science, no medicine (just superstition), no democracies, no republics, no rights of man (the Magna Charta, the Bill of Rights, & the UN Declaration of Human Rights have no comparable parallels in any other society in human history), no freedom, no sense of justice, no political theory, no economic theory, no space flight, no technology, no universities, no Shakespeare, no Mozart, no Michelangelo, no daVinci, no calculus, no middle class, no sense of the possibility of improvement in life for the individual or society, no social movements, no movement between economic classes, slavery would still exist (and does in more backwards regions), and the cycle between feast and famine would still be ongoing, with the world population numbered in the millions instead of billions. Name one society anywhere on earth that gave the world even close to what the white man has. The contributions of the ancient Egyptians and the middle ages Chinese were scribblings in the dirt in comparison to what the white man has accomplished in the last 500 years.

 

If Buzzfeed is cancer, does that make the Huffington Post "you have 24 hours to live"?

 

Your utter lack of subject matter knowledge when it comes to the history of mankind is glaringly obvious.

White males did not just wander out of caves in Europe 500 years ago and invent everything that you listed above.

Knowledge is fungible and claiming credit for something that was discovered earlier is dishonest. The math that we use today comes from a variety of sources from all around the world. The earliest signs of math are shown in notched bones from about 44,000 BC found in a cave in South Africa.

The human race has built upon shared knowledge and what we have today is a legacy of what has been contributed since the invention of writing which originated in Mesopotamia and Egypt around 3500 BC.

 

"tenets"

"Tenants" are the people who live in the building.

And atheists are mistaken if they believe that their policy views hold or should hold any more weight than religious people's views. That would be forcing atheists' views onto religious people, the same way they object to religious people forcing their views onto atheists.

 

Did I say math? No, I didn't, I said calculus. And most of that legacy had to be rediscovered by the Renaissance and the Enlightenment before it could be turned into the world that we have today. The Dark Ages weren't just dark in Europe, they were dark all over the world. Rome was the most advanced society on earth for 500 years, then it fell and ignorance and superstition reigned supreme over all the world for 1000 years. In China, they invented paper, gunpowder, and the water clock, but none of those inventions improved the lives of the people one bit. Scribblings in the dirt, comparatively speaking. The computer alone dwarfs any and all other accomplishments of mankind, and it was entirely the product of white men's science and technology.

 

I have seen parts of America where poverty is rampant and it looks like a third world country. The war on poverty is being lost as it is overburdening our society. Compared to real 3rd world countries are poor live like rich people.

 

1. You only help the needy with other people's money. Study after study has shown that conservatives are far more generous with their own money than liberals are. But you're more than willing to vote for "the rich" to give to "the poor", as long as it doesn't come out of your pocket. 2. You're only opposed to wars that are in our national interest. If they are for "good causes", you're just as much in favor of war as the most gung-ho conservative. 3. You only respect women's freedoms if those women aren't a) still in the womb; b) conservative; c) in the Middle East (there have been zero women's rights marches for Muslim women, who are the most repressed women on the planet); or d) Christian (it was a Christian woman baker whose rights were trampled by the homosexual lobby). 4. Right-wingers accept "collateral damage" as a price that has to be paid for freedom, even if that sometimes includes them. One army group called in an air strike on their own location, knowing full well that they could be killed in the action, but since they were surrounded and pinned down, they figured better to take out the enemy as well as themselves. 5. As for "cutting education," since we aren't getting what we pay for, might as well cut it. We're paying the most dollars per student of any country in the world, but our education system is one of the worst if not THE worst in the developed world. Why continue funding it? Why continue to throw good money after bad? Our university system is privately run (even the public universities have private management) and is universally acknowledged to be the best in the world, while our school systems are publicly run and are universally acknowledged to be among the world's worst. See any connection?