Okay, Many you have read or heard about this guy calling the girl a slut. Many of you FAIL to create connection. This man is absolutely correct. In the video of the news conference she says a lot of things. Lets debunk and explain what it all means for those of you who think the comment was nasty and untrue. Lets see what you think. She claims that birth control costs $3000 a year. Okay, now...that means its $1000 a year on just birth control. Now lets do some math, lets say she uses the most common form of contraception, condoms. You can literally online order condoms or packs where it averages at like $0.25 which even might be a stretch on the expensive side. So lets assume this girl wants to have sex once a day, everyday. (365)x(3)=1095days (1095)x(0.25)=273.75 So if you used condoms...you would be paying 273.75. If many of you don't know, it is THE most effective form of protection. It protects pregnancy, and spread of disease. Now lets assume a more extreme case...lets say this girl wants to have sex 3 times a day...okay so thats (273.75)x(3)=821.25 bucks... for three years. Not to mention, if the woman has a partner, why would she be covering the whole entire tab, why can't her other "half" cover half of it? Secondly, apparently condoms aren't good enough, noooooooooo, they want the "morning" after pill which costs much more. So basically, this girl wants to use a LESS EFFECTIVE, but MORE EXPENSIVE form of protection and wants YOU to pay for it. Remember people?...healthcare is now government controlled (although even if it was private sector, the regulation would cause an insurance price jack anyway). Rush Limbaugh simply said that prostitute was, because she wants people to pay her in order to have sex. Thats practically the definition of it. Yes, he was no politically correct. However, to you lefters out there, please, please, point out where you disagree/agree and why.
All you appear to have shown me is that you are of the opinion that some sections of society are entitled to free speech and others are not.
Honestly, I cannot seriously accept it yet...that taxpayers, US, are actually using our hard earned cash to pay for some woman to have sex...if she cannot afford to have sex, then she shouldn't even be having it. Healthcare is to cover your health. She will survive just fine without any. This is socialism at its finest, and liberals showing their amazing intelligence.
First it's claimed the man is absolutely correct. That he can vilify a female is acceptable? Second it's claimed the woman puts forward a view that isn't absolutely correct. But the man is entitled to free speech and the lady is criticised for having her say? And that's what Americans claim is free speech?
Say what you will, but be prepared for the backlash. Rush has experienced much backlash, but it's faux outrage for the most part.
That women is stupid, she deserved what she got. Rush Limbaugh is a hardworking american who EARNS his money and PAYS for his own things...he does not expect you or anybody else to pick up the tab for him.
No one needs to wonder ANY longer how we end up with so MANY unplanned pregnancies1 Condoms are LOUSY at preventing pregnancy, and that assumes you are using them CORRECTLY, which in many cases by people who obviously don't have a clue, they ARE NOT using them correctly! The Pill is 99%+ effective, so to avoid being one of the 2 out of 10 who get pregnant, a person would need to use BOTH to get pregnancy protection AND disease protection. This knocks all the OP's figures into a cocked hat. FAIL!
