This is common knowledge, and it's stated in every story. At the beginning of the assault they didn't know how many people there were. It wasn't until he went to a few different classrooms that people identified there was only one. Then, of course, the fact that he shot and killed himself. The thought that someone else is involved becomes very complicated when you add in the fact that the shooter didn't kill himself until he saw the police coming for him. If someone else were to kill him at that time, especially a big time gangster, they would have been noticed fleeing the seen by the police officers. According to the "theory" or what you guys say is "just asking questions"(Lamest truther mantra ever), he even left his car at the crime scene. Which means, he would have to be running on foot from a massive school shooting in which police are already on the scene. The odds of this happening next to impossible, and even more "crazy" than the idea that a lone gunman committed these crimes and then took his own life.
It is never ever disgusting to ask questions....as a matter of fact I find it disgusting when questions are not asked and blindly believing obvious liars like the government and main stream media telling a story. ___ Sandy Hook AR-15 Hoax? Still No School Surveillance Footage Released Why has no surveillance footage been released from the Sandy Hook shooting, showing Adam Lanza blasting away with an AR-15? Here’s why the non-release of this video footage is so interesting: Every time a school shooting takes place, one of the very first things that gets released to the media is the school surveillance footage depicting the gun and the shooter. The purpose of this is to associate the pain and anguish of the massacre to the image of a scary-looking rifle. In mere days after the Columbine shooting in 1998, for example, the media received footage from the massacre and began playing it over and over again, hammering home the images of Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold with their guns. The same is true with numerous other school shootings as you’ll see below. But with the Sandy Hook school shooting, no video footage has been released. A reasonable person has to ask the question: WHY? You see, the release of footage of Adam Lanza murdering children with an AR-15 — if such a thing even happened — would strongly support the mainstream media’s call for banning so-called “assault rifles.” It would also: • Amp up the emotional impact of the fear mongering being carried out by the media. • Provide visual support for the gun-grabber’s plea to ban all rifles. • Provide a wealth of images to be used by newspapers and magazines to further demonize the image of rifles. … and yet, for some reason, we see no surveillance footage from Sandy Hook. Why is that? Answer: The AR-15 appears to have been left in his car and never even used in the shooting The real answer to all this — and this reveals the “Big Lie” of the mainstream media — is that the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle was left in Lanza’s car. It was never brought into the school in the first place. As a result, it was not used in the shooting. This was openly admitted in an NBC news report that has since been scrubbed and marginalized. But NaturalNews captured the video and posted it on our own private video network which is immune from censorship: Click here to watch the NBC News video yourself. Here’s a partial transcript of the video: Matt Lauer: Pete Williams, our chief justice correspondent, has got some new information as well, good morning. Pete Williams: Matt, good morning to you. This continues to be a very complex investigation, and there is a lot of contradictory information out there, but there is some new information this morning from a couple of federal officials and state officials. They say now that there were actually four handguns recovered inside the school. Not just two as we were initially told. Four handguns and apparently only handguns that were taken into the school. We knew that Adam Lanza… also had an assault-style, AR-15 style rifle that he had taken to the school that was in the car he drove there, his mother’s car. But we’ve been told by several officials that he left that in the car. Adam Lanza left the AR-15 in the car This simple fact, which was confirmed by “federal officials and state officials” has been completely scrubbed out of the mainstream media, and replaced with the “assault weapon lone gunman” theory that just happens to fit nicely with the citizen disarmament agenda being pushed by anti-American traitors like Dianne Feinstein and Joe Biden. This is why no video footage has been released. Because the real video footage almost certainly shows HANDGUNS used in the massacre, not a rifle. rest of the article: http://theintelhub.com/2013/01/14/s...till-no-school-surveillance-footage-released/
To show how pathetically ridiculous your post is, he didn't even use an AR-15. He used a Bushmaster XM-15. If your article can't even pretend to get the most miniscule of details correct, why would anyone believe anything else that is contained in it? It appears that your article is a complete lie. The "intel hub" LoL. That is classic. Try again sir. ETA: There has been talk of with holding the security footage as it can be viewed as "glorifying" what was done. Giving the assaulter face time on the news to get recognition. What you guys consider "scrubbed and marginalized" is called investigative work. As more information comes out they change the article to reflect the facts. Something conspiracy theorists don't seem to be able to understand.
Or maybe, just maybe the kids and teachers in the school have a right to privacy and they don't want images of their suffering splattered all over the public domain for idiots to call fake or jerk off to.
What an explanation. It's lucky that most people still have common sense to the swift boat propaganda. So many people realized this is an actor's performance. To your ps. The evil group that created this crime used to use this kind of trick. To 911 truthers, they asked similar question, "How do you think the people who lost their spouses, friends in 911 attack would feel when they read these threads?" Do you think you can stop people to discover the truth by such question? My answer is very clear: If you really care for those victims, find the truth. Put the real criminals and put them on justice. Otherwise more tragedy will happen.
show me who's an actor at sandy hook, along with the evidence to support your claim i can guarantee you i could ask you a question that you'd find disgusting
They activated a lot of actors. The Sandy Hook Actors PART 1 [video=youtube;8_b9hh2lp3I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_b9hh2lp3I[/video] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_b9hh2lp3I Pres. OBAMA FAKE CRYING [video=youtube;_JXOW9sLLiM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JXOW9sLLiM[/video] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JXOW9sLLiM Even President's wife felt disgust on his hypocrite. I understand someone as accessary has to follow the order to do cover up jobs.
you don't understand what evidence is do you? the first guy in the video is robert parker, father of emilie parker show some real evidence that he's an actor the young woman with blonde hair is kaitlin roig a teacher at sandy hook, why do you insist on being so ridiculous seriously, what good do you think can come from perpetrating lies like you're doing?
One of these days you guys may begin to question which people are asking questions, and which people draw conclusions without a chain of custody, or 3rd party verification. For example: I find those pictures to be interesting, but the only question it brings me to ask about is the chain of custody of those pictures to their source. Where as the fact that Adam Lanza's dad is VP of taxes at GE, and that James Holmes father is lead scientist for anti-fraud software at FICO, brings more questions then I know what to do with.
Alright, Guy_Fawkes_Mask_03 what questions does it make you ask? Because someone has a job, which I'm sure you haven't locked down, that means something? Please draw out these "questions" you have, I love seeing you guys put this stuff into words.
First and fore most is, what is the statistical probability that two historic shootings would occur within months of each other, and the small group of people who have information sensitive to banking elite's happens to be the fathers of both suspects? I mean it is a real mathematical question, that can be answered, through statistics and not a rhetorical question. Second, can anyone offer a source for scheduled testimony in a house or congressional hearing, and if they can, were either of these men(Robert Holmes, and Peter Lanza) scheduled to testify? I have other questions about Sandy Hook, not related to who these guys fathers are. Like why hasn't one picture of Lanza holding the assault rifle at the school been released? We have precedent for this expectation.
that's a completely looney accusation blame everything on bankers, sounds like 17th century salem massachusetts
I don't need to tell you what you are afraid of, when I have provided an example of a reaction of fear from you. Just attempt after attempt, of one red herring after another! If I had to venture a guess though, I think you are afraid of transparency.
more evidence of lying conspiracy theorists [video=youtube;DTaC580hfPo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTaC580hfPo[/video]