Secret Note Discovered in Stomach of "AA77" Passenger

That's incorrect, I provided all the information I have proving NIST's gross failures all over this section of the forum and more concentrated here:

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-nist-9-11-scam-exposed-in-all-its-glory.458597/

 

Reading comprehension Bob. It's important. You asked me if I, Gamolon, believed the NIST report was bogus. I stated no, because you presented nothing to me pertaining to NIST intentionally omitting or falsifying data.

 

Ok quit being FOS, it's unnecessary, I provided the disclaimer from the very first post on this particular subject.

 

You mean like the photo you believed was prior to the collapse when it was proven to be a mashup of different photos? Proof like that?

 

You took it at face value without researching it though right Bob? If you would have researched it, you would have known.

 

That doesn't excuse you posting crap as proof when it's wrong.

 

You're correct and I agree, YOU don't believe it no matter the volume of evidence.

Reading comprehension Gamolon. It's important, like the disclaimer I posted. Why do you insist on playing word games? So still no picture of the alleged superimposed photo? Why is that?

 

You mean like the claim that the plane went through three rings like it was hard to believe? I asked you about that also, but you balked at it. Do you believe the plane went through six, outer, reinforced walls, and that makes it hard to believe?

I bet it is.

 

I'll find it. Don't worry. Anyways, why would you need the superimposed picture? I showed you the original background?

 

Nope I posted a disclaimer. You still haven't produced anything supporting YOUR claim.

I can "know" what doesn't exist. No photo so far from you so it doesn't exist yet ... waiting.

 

Unlike you I don't believe what I'm fed by the US government on faith. Yes it makes no sense and given the fact that it was never legitimately investigated it has extreme skepticism written all over it.

 

Link to photo: http://www.tennhills-productions.com/guests.htm


Look familiar Bob?

 

But you believe what you're fed by other conspiracy theorists right Bob?

 

Failed to answer the question again Bob? Do you question that the plane going through three rings is hard to believe because there were six, reinforced, outer walls for those 3 rings?

 

I'm not "worried", it's far from the only problem with the official 9/11 narrative. The original background is obscured by the alleged superimposed photo as YOU claim. I have no problem agreeing with you that the photo is bogus if it truly is bogus, I try to deal with accuracy to the extent possible. I don't "need" the alleged superimposed photo unless it truly does exist. What I need is everything about 9/11 that's valid since that's my agenda throughout my research.

 

Nope, I believe what makes sense and the official conspiracy theory makes no sense. I can say the same about you, you believe what you've been fed by the foremost conspiracy theorist, the US government.

 

Reading comprehension remember? Already answered.

 

So the photo made sense even though it was made up of a couple different photos? Whatever you say Bob.

Nope, I believe whatever makes sense AND stands up to scrutiny. The last part is where you and I differ. You just take things at face value as long as it goes against the "OCT".

 

Interesting. Why do you believe there were six reinforced walls that the plane went through? Do you have supporting evidence? I have evidence against what you believe.

 

So you claim but haven't proven thus far. Again for the reading comprehension impaired, I posted a disclaimer. Whether the photo "makes sense" or not remains to be seen.

But you believe the ENTIRETY of the OCT makes sense and stands up to scrutiny even though there is a massive amount of evidence that was deliberately destroyed and another mountain of evidence/documents classified and unavailable to the public, which means YOU. And then there's not one significant thing you question. Ok Gamolon, I have no problem with that kind of mentality, you're far from the only person who shares it.

That's not true at all as already well explained so even you can understand it (but pretend not to). I'm inclined to LISTEN to all contradictory/questionable claims BECAUSE the OCT makes no sense to me and is a clear fraud. Not to mention I have zero faith in the US government to ever be truthful given its track record of pathological lies. That doesn't mean I take things at face value, that's a nonsensical claim. A typical example of how I deal with 9/11 claims is the very first post in this thread (which I've already pointed YOU to):

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/

Another example is Judy Wood's theories. I agree with many of the points she exposes but I remain highly skeptical of her conclusions. The same is true with the nuclear theory. It doesn't mean I won't study these or that I knee jerk agree or reject them. And THOSE are the true differences between you and I. YOU knee jerk bought EVERYTHING, defend all of it nearly 24/7 and question or even reject none of it.

 

Who told you this? Where did I say that? Why do you need to invent things about me?

 

You never said you didn’t believe it. Unless I missed it.

So you don’t think that?

 

Yes I have. Are you blind? I have showed you two separate photos used to make up the picture you posted. Are you suggesting that the photo you posted was the original and that the two photos I posted were separated from yours?

 

Put a hole in several rings Bob. That's what you said right?

 

Before it was examined?

How is/are classified evidence/documents proof that the "OCT" is bogus? You're citing evidence you haven't seen... as evidence?!