Senior Secret Service agent suggests she wouldn't take 'a bullet' for Trump

Admitting or even questioning yourself when in a position of this nature requires immediate removal! The first amendment has nothing to do with it but her oath taken and job description clearly mean that just like when I served that she be willing to do anything to protect the President and our nation even if it means taking a bullet for one you don't like.

 

She should be assigned to the South Pole to investigate the massive currency counterfeiting ring there.

 

Absolutely fired. When you take up the position of law enforcement or any other position such as secret service, you are taking an oath. An oath to serve. Her disregard for her duty is a disgrace to the position and she should be removed immediately.

- - - Updated - - -

All that means is she cannot be jailed or prosecuted by the government. That is it. How the hell do you not know this by now?

 

Too bad you don't hold Trump to the same standard regarding Twitter.

 

I wonder if that's how other Presidents got shot? Their guards might not have liked them.

 

Yea in todays world, anonymity is important. To many wackjobs who will seek you out and attempt to ruin your life, whether by harassing you are your work place, or making you exercise your 2nd amend rights. Just to many crazies.

- - - Updated - - -

We do, just as soon as Trump says he wont look out for America because of his political affiliations we will condemn him to. But hint...he wont.

 

Why did Trump appoint people who are directly opposed to their departments? Secretary of Energy Rick Perry has vowed many times to one day destroy the Department of Energy. His EPA director denies AGW and has vowed to fight to EPA. His labor secretary doesn't believe that workers should have breaktimes or overtime pay.

It's like Trump is trying to destroy our institutions. How can you support this wolf in sheep's clothing?

 

That's what happens when you institute affirmative action and allow women ahead of more qualified and dedicated men. Why should this surprise anyone?

 

How can you let your own hatred blind you to the realities so much?

 

I'm not allowed to hate Trump based on his words and actions?

 

Protecting them doesn't mean to "take a bullet".

 

America's safety shouldn't depend on such a yuuuuge ass as Trump either.

No, she shouldn't have said it but it's up to her bosses if she can fully perform her duties. I imagine she can because her job doesn't include taking a bullet for Trump.

 

put her on the first plane along with that nut who went on a protest the other day.

someone forgot to inform her that secret service is supposed to keep there mouths shut and eyes open. You know.... Secret.

 

Trump is a moron. Nobody should have to take a bullet for him.

But that is the job of the Secret Service, and she was wrong to put these things out on Facebook. It compromises her amongst her colleagues, and compromises her ability to do her job. It would not be wrong to reassign her or fire her.

 

Has she told you how she voted, or is the absence of fawning devotion to your idiot in chief all the evidence you need?

 

A hatred of Trump to that level is an obvious sign for any critical thinker.

 

I didn't see anything in the job description that says they have to take a bullet, I only see where it says they have to protect.

 

Very unprofessional.

 

Oh good grief. "Radical anti-Americans"? The only anti-American you need to worry about is the cretin you just elected whose only interests are himself, his fragile ego and acquiring money.

 

Yes, and anyone blind and deaf to the actions of the lying, pretentious, boastful and self-serving idiot you elected deserves all they get, frankly. Critical thinking evidently isn't a trait in those who think Trump's New World is going to be a magic garden of peace, prosperity and harmony. All they can hear is 'make America great again', and they fail to see that he has already taken America several steps backwards.

 

If it were self-interestedness he wouldn't have submitted himself to all this mass hatred. I can see through you . . . he said he's going to prevent any more illegal Mexicans/drug cartel scum coming into the country, and Islamists who want to slaughter American women and children in shopping malls, but to your insufferably self-righteous, holier-than-thou closed mind, that doesn't make him a thoughtful and caring president, it makes him a racist. Am I right or not?

 

No, you're wrong. Next question-and your reflexive defensiveness is noted, by the way. Not a BNP supporter by any chance?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-racist-examples_us_56d47177e4b03260bf777e83

 

I haven't read the job description so you may be right.

The point is that by being partisan she has compromised herself. I don't like Trump but that doesn't mean she is right.

 

Oh right, the anarchic and rabidly lefty Huffington Post is your idea of an unprejudiced source is it? I'm not wrong in my summing up of you, and you know it. Somebody has caught you out at last, and the best you can come up wi9th is a childish accusation of my being a BNP supporter - how utterly, utterly pathetic!

 

I am sorry, but she is right which is why she should be removed from the entire profession. If she decides she will not take a bullet (or protect Trump to the best of her ability) then she will not. Nobody can say she is wrong because she is the only one who can decide.