Shifting burdens of proof; proof “Liberals” are insane?

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by DivineComedy, Jul 15, 2013.

  1. DivineComedy

    DivineComedy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    By definition “Liberals” are open-minded, to being conservative, which to them being conservative is the equivalent of mental illness; basically by design “Liberals” are self-defecating and prone to destroying the very Liberal institutions (like the right to keep and bear Arms, and innocent until proven guilty) they created in the first place.

    To a Liberal a man is innocent until proven the glove fits, and innocent until proven his nose was not broken; the burden of proof is always the same;

    To an insane “Liberal” a man is innocence until proven the glove fits, and guilty until proven his nose was broken: the burden of proof is fluid.

    To a Liberal the case is a civil rights violation when the trial is unfair.

    To a “Liberal” the case is a civil rights violation when the trial is fair.

    Since for the “Liberal” the burden of proof in one case is on the prosecution but in another is on the defense, therefore, the “Liberal” is insane.

    Since for the “Liberal” the fair trial was a civil rights violation, therefore, the “liberal” is insane.
     

Share This Page