Should AboveAlpha allow us to set him up for the office of POTUS as early as 2016?

I was talking about quarks and how they occupy multiple realities too.

The Neutrinos are another story. And yes their properties probably also have to do with a multiverse theory,

 

It is unlikely Quarks would interact with our detectors if they occupied another dimension.

 

They exist in every possible state at the same time and each one of those states splits into its own universe when it's observed, including the one in our's. So, in other words, they don't occupy another dimension they occupy ALL of them, and then one of those states gets passed on to us at detection.

 

Why then do they make up the fundamentals of what we consider matter?
Do they do so in all universes?
Would that not actually make them everything?

 

Yes they are the basic matter. That isn't in question.

They don't do it in all universes, they do so in our baseline universe, there are more universes where they don't exist with the properties they do in this universe, or can't exist.

The concept of being everything doesn't apply.

 

It would seem you confuse Neutrino function with Quark as no "Baseline" exists for dimensional existence.

 

I'm referring to a term from AboveAlpha's multiverse theory. AA's theory is based on the Many World theory, but instead of there being a single world there are baselines of universes with the same physical laws, but there are other baseline universes with different natural laws.

 

Thus is the flaw in his theory exposed, and he actually knows it. In truth it is not a flaw in the theory as much as your misunderstanding of it. At the level we are discussing there would be no variation in natural function, instead there are universes/dimensions that do not contain certain elements or "States" of energies. The Neutrino (as we refer to it) is a fundamental aspect of "That which is" and does not change in properties...as Quarks tend to. Think of Neutrino existence as the canvas below this work of art.

 

Well I haven't heard about neutrinos until a few years ago. Well it fluctuates between flavors. And it has a tiny amount of mass, in the form of a magnetic moment, which it shouldn't have in theory but, and this is only a guess, the multiverse gives it this property, and it's borrowing that property from a universe that it does have a natural massive property.

 

The "Neutrino" does not carry what we call mass in any way. This entity cannot influence or be influenced by any of the physics known to humans and will not be seen by them because of it. This is best described as an invisible glue that is not sticky or useful in bonding in our reality. For all intent and purpose we should simply ignore and forget about it as it is mere mental masturbation for this dimension just as God is....but far less destructive to consciousness.

 

Well since a neutrino has a magnetic moment then yes it does influence physics.

Now they are starting to think that with enough research we can use neutrinos as a power source. That wouldn't be possible if it never interacted with matter.

Neutrino Energy, Clearly the Energy of the Future

 

I am unfamiliar with magnetism in Neutrino...please explain.

 

I don't know, I just heard a few years ago that the neutrino has a magnetic moment.

 

As we have yet to even detect a Neutrino (and never will) it is very unlikely we have managed to note magnetism in the thing we have not even noted. Neutrino is simply a term we created for something we have postulated into being. The actual "Force" is immaterial in this dimension and thus unavailable to observation and interaction.

 

We can detect neutrinos, such as in nuclear reactions:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino#Nuclear_reactions

 

That is NOT detection...it is viewing assumed results of interaction.

 

If the interaction is understood and experimentally proven, then I don't see the difference between direct detection and indirect detection.

 

How do you experiment on something you cannot observe or confirm as real?

 

Well since neutrinos interact with the weak force, they should use anything with the weak force.

And if it really does have a small magnetic moment then it might interact via electromagnetism.

 

Should and If are not helpful in scientific explanation.

 

Where is AA? That guy is awesome.

 

Well I'm not a scientist. I'm just a guy who reads the news and every so often I learn that they find out something new about neutrinos.

 

Last I heard he was on a JOB.

 

This kind of law is only enforced when someone tries to falsely arrest another by claiming to be law enforcement. Besides, when someone lies as badly as AA, do we expect him to be up on law?

My entire point is that he doesn't work for ANY gov't. He is a loser who lies about what he does in order to scoop up undeserved respect from those who apply no critical reasoning power to his posts. Additionally, why should he care what you forward to an MP? I'm sure they get hundreds if not thousands of messages each week. Why would he bother to chase this one down, particularly if the originator was a patent fraud?

Your test was badly flawed.

 

So I guess I'm not the only one here who thinks the guy is a fraud.