Should Clinton release the transcripts and Foundation records before the election?

Trump is always being audited, when trump shows his, Clinton will show hers

as for her old statement, she said when all the then candidates released them she would, has any of them released them, let alone all of them, they should of took her up on it

.

 

And it is a positive that Clinton is hiding several things in what she attempts to hide, but that doesn't seem to matter to you.

 

If they have not reached a conclusion then it would interfere with the inquiry to release any portion of the information as Clinton demands. She is urging him to break the law, just as she has on so many occasions.

 

Here s your original assertion that Hillary is using money for her campaign from the Clinto Foundation.


Quote Originally Posted by Ronstar

we know the names of all the big donors to the Clinton Foundation.
none of that money can be used for her campaign

And the Pollycy reply "guess again"


So we have clearly proven that innuendo/claim of yours to be a lie. Now if you want to claim Hillary is taking money from wall street of course that is true. So you have switched from lying to telling the truth. Good to see personal growth. Every candidate takes money from someone or do you actually believe the Trump lie that he self funded his whole campaign for the nomination?

 

Once again, not what Clinton publicly stated. Just shows how she will lie about anything to cover her butt.

 

no it would not, don;t be silly, he can release them if he chooses

.

 

You and she are so wonderful for ignoring the fact that the others have none to release, only she does. Is this what she is pinning her statement on, that they have not released records that do not exist? That would be something Clinton knows about, think 30,000 emails.

 

she stated when all the candidates that were in at the time release theirs, she owuld release hers.. has that happened... no

they should of took her up on the offer..

I doubt Clinton or Trump will release anything
.

 

Oh, and your statement and I quote

" Read your first paragraph in the above post, then read your last. In the first you claim that all this money Hilarity is being showered with is not going to be used in her campaign"

Is a lie. I said nothing of the sort. Here is my first paragraph

Quote Originally Posted by CourtJester
No your statement was that money given to the Clinton Foundation was used in Hillary's campaign. You have failed miserably to provide any evidence for your statement. Try to actually understand that because donors gave to both the Clinton Foundation and gave separatly to Hillary's campaign doesn't demonstrate in any way that money given to the Clinton Foundation was used improperly.

Don't you ever get tired of making things up. Stop emulating you hero Trump and start telling the truth for a change.

 

Reached a conclusion on what?

His audit?

That's normal operating procedure and means nothing. It's certainly not indicative of possible fraud.

Good Lord! It never occurred to me that some people don't know what an audit is.

 

You did not know that EVERY SINGLE TIME an audit precedes a tax fraud charge? Holy cow. LOL

 

Well, Jester, darn it, I had hoped that we were coming to an agreement on something, at least. I guess not. But I'll settle for your acknowledgement (?) that she's going to take the Wall Street millions and spend it on either her campaign, or, the Clinton Foundation roflol. At her age, she's not going to be spending it on tampons, so, unless she just wants to make a fashion-statement in one of her mansions by piling all the cash up in a corner, I think we can safely say we know where the money's going. I hope people of your political viewpoint, Vladimir Putin, and Xi Jinping are happy . You, and Hilarity's Wall Street bosses, are about the only ones who are....

BTW, no, Trump isn't "my guy". "My guy" was Rick Perry, who was unfairly sabotaged by a completely bogus lawsuit that was finally thrown out of court in Texas in February. It had been brought by a dirty bunch of lying bastard Democrat hyperliberals in liberal-infested Travis County. So, rest easy... Hilarity will give you an Obama 3rd-Term. And with luck it'll be about another ten years before all these Democrat morons in D. C. get us involved in a Third World War....

. "They're actually gonna do it, boys! The (*)(*)(*)(*)ing idiots are really going to elect Hillary!"

 

Predictable as stench after a dog craps on the living room floor. "Everybody does it!" Is that your rationalization? Everybody is a stooge for big Wall Street money? Hilarlity Clinton sure as hell is! And now you admit it. Good, glad to see your personal growth, too, even if it appears to be just another form of Democrat cancer.

Interestingly, you know someone who isn't a hide-in-the-dark suck-up for Wall Street? NOT Bernie Sanders, who is surely the only thoroughly honest, ethical, and completely admirable person left in this race through a (*)(*)(*)(*)-pit to the White House. I may be forced to vote for Trump, if only to keep more hyperliberal, Constitution-hating slimebags like Kagan and Sotomayor off the Supreme Court, but if personal honor and character are still remembered as being admirable in a candidate, then Bernie Sanders deserves to win!

 

You did not know that you just posted another lie? LOL

 

Tell me how you can get a tax fraud charge without an audit?

 

Are you? .She promised a speech and she gave one its called a contract and public figures often market their celebrity status for speaking fees. We already know that. The transcript will show what she said with microphone to make her voice carry. If she wanted some dirty deal arrangement beyond the contract , she is not going to talk about it in a quasi public speech with a hundred witnesses to leak the details and a damning transcript of the whole thing.. That sort of thing happens in whispers in a hotel room with 3-5 carefully chosen people, not in the auditorium full of people and their cell phones to record it for posterity.

If there was a 'deal', its not going to make its way to a teleprompter or her typed up remarks.

 

Tell me that every audit results in a fraud charge. Outside of your own imagination, of course.

You are the one claiming that every single audit results in a fraud charge. Your proof? Oh, that's right. You don't need proof, your mind is already made up.

 

With the pressure that she is capable of and usually uses, she can insure no one talks.

You don't, and can't by your own admission, know if a deal were made, but judging by her past there probably is one. Witness how hard she is trying to keep it secret. Perhaps she should have worked that hard on her email server.

 

I haven't said whether she made a deal or not. I have said you don't announce it to an auditorium full of witnesses with cell phones. What you want to find evidence of, isn't in the transcript of a quasi public address. Who the hell does it that way?

Of course there is undoubtedly something embarrassing in there, because any politician is going to tailor his remarks with his audience in mind, so she was not likely to be pressing her progressive talking points that she is doing on the campaign trail. Instead she is going to sound like some moderate republican in her tone. But there is nothing remotely illegal or any ethics violations sitting in a public speech she is giving. It does not take a genius to guess what happened. Its the same thing Trump does right now.

 

That makes absolutely no sense, try again.......your diction & comprehension are quite amusing.

 

This is great !!!

So does the same hold true for the Federal Investigation of Hillary Clinton and her " little e-mail " mistake..... ?

That old carpetbaggers shenanigans with just finances if properly investigated would keep an honest Attorney General busy for years, she is as crooked as they come...

 

I never claimed anything of the kind. I said it is POSSIBLE he is guilty of tax fraud. Perhaps he knows he is and wants to keep that information under wraps until after the election. I am merely speculating as that is all we can do since he will not show his tax returns like every other candidate does. He could clear this up quite easily....but he won't because he is hiding something. it must be awful.

 

No, you said that every audit resulted in a fraud charge. Spin it in your mind however you want, but that is what you said prior to backtracking and trying to spin it to cover your butt.

 

Its not what I said at all but it is very possible that trump has committed tax fraud. He certainly must be hiding something awful

 

Sure it did when you realize that your original proof relied on one Republican questioning Hillary's finances as proof of her corruption. Just trying to illustrate the flaws in your thinking processes, if one can be generous enough to call them "thinking"