Should the U.S call Kims Bluff?

Discussion in 'Opinion POLLS' started by tecoyah, Apr 9, 2013.

?

Should we call Kims Bluff?

  1. Yes...we need to put this moron in his place.

    33.3%
  2. No....it may backfire and start a real war.

    44.4%
  3. Only if he starts it.

    11.1%
  4. Maybe....but Im ascared.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Targetted assasination makes the most sense.

    22.2%
  6. Don't worry about it...he's just puffing up his chest.

    22.2%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What will be the impact on the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty if as you suggest Pandora's Box is open?
     
  2. gabriel1

    gabriel1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    lol! Israel, Pakistan, india , iran and NK thumb their noses at America and you still believe theres a treaty!!?? lol
     
  3. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So in the era of nuclear proliferation what should Obama do to defend the peoples of America from possible nuclear attack by North Korea or some other incipient nuclear weapons state?
     
  4. gabriel1

    gabriel1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    north korea cannot attack America. and whether you like it or not, the only thing to do is go back to the same insane situation we had in the last century. did you really think things were going to get better?? lol democrats and republicans cant even cooperate. you really believed countries could?? lol
     
  5. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I didn't suggest the DPRK would attack the US in the immediate future. It's unlikely to do that directly even after they extend the range on the Taepodong. Instead, it's going to proliferate weapons technologies to third parties who will ultimately attack the US. Allow me to continue the interrogation. How should Obama defend the peoples of the US against nuclear attack by NK or some other incipient weapons state?
     
  6. WanRen

    WanRen New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    14,039
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Kim jr. will not start a war at 29 years old he is just trying to proof himself to the old guards that he is as tough as his grandfather and father plus he wants more money.
    [video=youtube;jTmXHvGZiSY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTmXHvGZiSY[/video]
     
  7. Mayor Snorkum

    Mayor Snorkum Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2012
    Messages:
    3,669
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What should King Obama, Fascist and Traitor, do?

    It doesn't matter what he should do, what he is going to do is ask the Chinese to loan some money, and he's going to pay off his fellow socialist in the DPRK....unless he figures getting a lot of Americans killed is what the Chinese want, in which case, he'll Blame Bush and get the American's killed.

    He's already insulted the DPRK by sending over that fool Kerry. Next step: sending over the Court Jester, Biden.
     

Share This Page