'Snapcrap' App Developer Hopes to Help Clean Up San Francisco Streets

So progressive.

 

So is snapcrap something you could “follow” like twitter?
That would be a riot!
I could haves me some fun glancing at hundreds if not thousands of photos of human crap, vomit and needles in the left wing utopia called San Francisco.

 

Oh good so at least you are now smart enough to only send the black homeless to Africa. Where are you going to send the white homeless?

 

So you are going to force them into shelters and I assume imprison them there

 

Obviously you have reading comprehension disabilities.

 

You were asked to post evidence that a significant percentage of the homeless were illigal immigrants. Apparently you cannot do so.

Suggest you actually make a bit of effort and read the link Imposted and note that 87% of the homeless are non hispanic or latino.

 

I was mostly being sarcastic. I think homelessness could be eradicated by revamping the system that tackles homelessness.
We need effective drug and mental health counseling services along with ending direct financial aid so they cannot re-up.
Rapid public housing instead of month long wait lists.
Shelters that do more to engage with the local population — and that keeps them safe.

Food scarcity could be implemented by forcing local grocers to donate unwanted produce instead of throwing it away - this has worked wonders in other nations.

 

Glad to hear that you were bring mostly sarcastic although that would be a better statement without the modifier.

 

I never claimed most homeless were illegals. The illegal imigration problem is separate from the homeless problem. Where they are connected is in that they both cost money, and if we weren't spending so much on illegals (and what we will spend on the current migrant caravan) we would have more money to use towards homelessness. Maybe you understand better now?

 

You are exactly right.

Another common game here is for someone who is losing a debate to start demanding references and then complain about the reference sources until the debate is entirely derailed and everyone has forgotten the original topic. I could state a basic fact like "water is wet" and be met with "prove it!", and then i could post links supporting the fact that water is wet, and the rebuttal would become some variation of "your source sucks" or "I don't believe anything posted on that site". It does get old.

Not everyone on these forums is interested in legitimate discussion, that is a downside to this format.

 

Only those you are not willing to let live with you.

 

I agree they are separate problems although of course your OP while ostensibly about the homeless somehow managed to bring in and tie together the two issues.. But as for money there are obviously differing opinions on if illegals cost us or make us money but anyway the dichotomy is a false choice which could be applied to any of the various ways the government spends money.

As a for instance if Trump hadn't done his massive tax cut for the rich thst money could have been spent towards the homeless. Or if the military didn't spend billions on weapons that don't work that could bevspentnon the homeless.

 

True many are only interested in presenting opinions that they pretend are based in fact. Those are usually the ones who whine when asked to back up their so called facts or use the old " everbody knows" or the " logical conclusion based on my own experience dodge"