Socialism

In theory his socialism is as good as he imagines it to be. Hard to argue against what he has imagined.

 

Empirical evidence also shows that worker ownership is associated with higher productivity. If anything, we can refer to the gains from having fewer managers (i.e. a more efficient hierarchy)

This is a red herring. Influence costs already inflicts big firms. The difference here is that we have a break on such activity: all involved have an interest in maintaining profit levels.

What's important is that there is an incentive to create firms. Greater equality of opportunity delivers that. And the incentive from growing? Compensation for your efforts. This is already a major aspect of firm creation, as the small firm hopes for takeover from the big fish.

 

You don't understand any economic theory and therefore you have no means to make an evaluation. All you have is getting supply and demand wrong (badly)