sotomayor lies in supreme court hearing

another liberal lie proven: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/sotomayor-s-false-claim-that-over-100-000-children-are-in-serious-condition-with-covid/ar-AASzANe?ocid=msedgntp this is s.o.p. for the majority of liberals in the u.s. government. lies, lies, and more lies. i.m.o. if any of you think she didn't lie i would like to read how you come to that conclusion. will not argue with you. just interested in your thoughts. thanks.

 

I suppose she relied on improper information or as you say she lied. I believe a Supreme Court Justice be impeached.

 

I don't understand how you people think at all. Why are so many people so vehemently opposed at trying to understand it's not "all or nothing"?

All <whatever side of politics> are all good or all bad.
All <whatever side of politics> are all right or all wrong.
All <whatever side of politics> are all honest or all dishonest.
All <whatever side of politics> are all aboveboard or all corrupt.

Do you honestly believe that <whichever side you're on> every single person is decent, good, uncorrupted, etc.? How is that even close to being accurate?

And, I don't have a thing against you. I see this exact same attitude about everything. Years ago, Amazon had a forum on IMDB where posters could talk about movies and tv shows. Some of us would all get online and watch "Monk" in our own homes and comment on the show. One day, I posted that a specific episode wasn't that well done and the reasons I didn't rate as I have done for other shows. You would have thought I suggested kidnapping the Pope the way other responded to my post. Why can't I dislike a show AND love the show overall? That makes no sense whatsoever.

This is the exact same <fuzzy thinking> Trump groupies have. Instead of acknowledging that many, many people have stepped out of the Orange Fog and distanced themselves, they are labeled "Never Trumpers". Why can't they be "previous Trumpers"?

I honestly have tried. I don't get this way of thinking in the least bit.

 

Are you kidding me!? How dare you! How could you do something like that!? What's wrong with you!?

This is . . . unbelievable!

 

i would call out anyone lib dem, or gop for lying when the (proof) of their lying comes out. i don't trust the cdc very much, but when they say the numbers sotamayor used about children in the hospitals with the virus was a lie. then i check other sources, proving she is lying or totaly incompetant.
i can understand her trying to defend the side she thinks is right. but she should use (facts, proven facts) to back up her statements. or i don't trust one word she tries to use to defend her point of view.

 

Between august 2020 and Dec. 2021 over 75,000 children from 0-17 were hospitalized with Covid, since Dec. the pace of children admissions picked up, she may be correct.

 

That is not reflected in your OP. I was commenting on this...

So, while your position is supported by whatever outside information you used to verify her claim, what you wrote is disparaging "the majority of liberals in the US government." which lends itself toward a battle cry against ALL liberals instead of this specific one whose claims you could adequately disprove.

Do you see the difference or should I try again?

 

the head of the cdc spins like crazy to avoid saying sotomayor lied about the number of children in the hospital & in serious conditions, & on ventilators. link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/cdc-director-corrects-justice-sotomayor-on-mischaracterization-of-pediatric-hospitalizations/vi-AASALrk?ocid=msedgntp. she keeps hiding using--unvax, people/kids to not give numbers and say sotomayor lied! and tries hard not to answer questions put to her. check it out for yourself. but does admit sotomayor said "over 100,000" kids in the hospital--realy only 3,500. very few in serious condition. sotomayor lied!! interested in your thoughts. thanks.

 

Getting a fact wrong doesn't equal lying.

Trump told some 30,000 lies, real ones, so what do you care if someone is lying?

 

Trump lied constantly, the right had no issues with it

 

so tell us how many children have been effect by Covid, I mean if were calling her a liar, give us the real number, she says over 100k, what was the number?

 

She didn't say how many children were "effect" [sic] by covid, she said 100,000 children, ARE IN serious condition and many on ventilators. That's different than "effect"[ed]. I was affected by covid (who hasn't?) but never in serious condition or on a ventilator.

So, your question, data updated January 9, 2022. https://healthdata.gov/dataset/COVID-19-Reported-Patient-Impact-and-Hospital-Capa/6xf2-c3ie
This data has number of pediatric cases of covid confirmed, suspected, and hospitalized (column 35). It shows 587 cases for one state, the max, so other states are much less but I'll use the max. 587 x 50 = 29,350 cases MAX. Hmmm, 100,000 vs 29,350 (probably near 15,000 total really). So, yes, Sotomayor lied, its not even close. CDC chief Dr. Rochelle Walensky was forced to correct Sotomayor’s dramatically inflated claim.

 

interesting, so she probably meant all time effected

 

so, almost 30k cases since January?

 

Show us that you're different. Show us that you're better. Show us that you have an issue with Sotomayor's blatant lies.

 

Like I said, Sotomayor is all emotion.

Doesn't care about the law. Doesn't care about the Constitution. Doesn't even care about basic facts.

She'll tell whatever lie she can to whip up inflame emotional-based outrage.

 

Like Kamala, if she wanted the facts, they are easily ascertained, and they were right in the briefs she apparently could not be bothered with reading, instead she mindlessly chirps her understanding of the current Leftwing Narrative.

At Minimum, Sotomayor Should Recuse Herself From All Decisions Regarding COVID.

“Sotomayor may not make a blunder as obvious as this one again, but the thought process—or lack thereof—that led to it will not change. You might call it the anti-scientific method.”

She is invincibly ignorant.

 

not saying he didn't. but can you give me a proven lie that trump said that was proven wrong. and the facts showing it was a lie? just asking, not saying your wrong. thanks.

 

not saying he didn't. but can you give me a proven lie that trump said that was proven wrong. and the facts showing it was a lie? just asking, not saying your wrong. thanks.

 

if you had watched my source link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/c...ric-hospitalizations/vi-AASALrk?ocid=msedgntp. the head of the cdc says sotomayor was wrong. only 3,500. please watch it to catch up before posting. thanks.

 

Watch the entire video, it's 13 minutes or so.

 

yes, the majority of liberals that i've heard or read what they say, i've found to be lies. so my statement that the majority of libs lie, is correct. & i said (majority) that doesn't include all liberals. for i've not heard or read what (all) liberals have said. understand where i'm coming from?

 

sotamayor is a supreme court judge. it would be very easy to check with the cdc to get the correct numbers from them by her staff. it seems that didn't happen. that tells me she is lying/making up numbers to support her point of view. for a s.c. judge she sould come out and admit she got the numbers wrong, and be very diligent in not letting that happen again. because she is a s.c. judge

 

what did mr "I like beer" have to say on the subject?

 

ok, watche all if your vid. many,many, holes in it. lets start with the first statement.--- trump incited the 1-6-21 riot. a lie!!! you think trump would not be in jail now if that was proven to be true? the cap p.d., washingtion p.d. or d.o.j. would have had charges on trump and he would have been arrested.-- this is (bias/propaganda) statement to "incite" the viewers.
2. Rothenberger (claims) trump tired to get him to dig up/disqualify/ 11,000 votes? that is illegal also. again if there was (real proof) trump would be arrested, charged, & awaiting a trial now, in jail!
3. there was presented no evidence in this vid that trump threatened rothenberger in this vid. only his word, no real evidence.
4. the interviewer time and again used quote: (un-named sources) as evidence saying this or that. that is propaganda no real evidence.
5. rothenberger said that trump said there were actually 11,000 dead voters. but! if you listen to what trump said, he said there (maybe) 11,000 dead voters voting. big difference.
6. the interviewer also said that trump used (edited) vid to show voting fraud. well what the interviewer didn't show is that the ballot boxes were only taken out from under the tables (after the "observers" ) had left the counting room and there were no observers there to verify the count. and also when the boxes were put under the table the edited vid from the interviewer didn't show that the observers could see that happening from their side of the room. the only shot of the observers shows there were plenty of people blocking the view of that part of the room.

and if there had been anything trump had done wrong you can bet he would be charged with crimes long before now. why? because there is no evidence to charge him with a crime. just like the collusion with russia investigation that went on for years, finding-----nothing!!!!
i do not mean to offend you in any way, but you asked me for my view of your source. so here it is.