~ It looks like Stacy Abrams is off on another one of her racist rants. More hating on white people and squawking about why Illegals don't have elected representation. Abrams said that 50% of the population under the age of 15 is in “communities of color and if they are removed from the calculation, a whiter, more Republican voting base will be created. ” This woman is being proposed as Joseph Biden's running mate ... https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...no-longer-able-elect-anyone-represents-video/
~ It's actually not up to Biden. The DNC make all the decisions . Biden may not even remember he is running for president !
I'll be voting for Donald Trump and I believe he is the right man for the right time. For the record He is 6'3 and weighs 240 lbs. Stacy Abrams is morbidly obese. If she wore a brown outfit she could be mistaken for a UPS truck!
I have a gut feeling it will be Amy Klobuchar. However, if it is, there goes a lot of his black support. Old Corn Pop won't be happy.
I don't know anything about a golf kart but you got the part about "being at the inaugeration ceremony" right
Stacy Abrams is just plain repugnant. She embodies the absolute worst of identity politics. That she is even getting press just goes to show you how complicit the media is in pushing these dirtbags and their socialist agendas. Nothing is her fault, every failure is blamed on racism or sexism not lack of talent or skill. She's the epitome of delusional entitlement.
WHO BE RACIST ? No Exceptionalism! May as well be the decades corrupt, Maxine Waters. Or sperm repository Kamala Harris. So What's New? psst: Biden promising a female VP is "genderist" Moi Don't ize
300,000 voters were purged from the voter registration rolls. What they do is send out postcards, make them look like junk mail, and if they are not returned, they purge the name from the roll. Repubs know statistically that in poor neighborhoods the return failure rate is much higher. So, someone who doesn't know they their name is being removed are not informed, BECAUSE repubs INTENTIONALLY put 'do not forward' on the card. See, if they would forward it, the person who moved would have the opportunity to inform the election committee that their address is changed. But no, they won't do that, because the more blacks who vote, the greater the chance a democrat can win. It's not enough to have an ID, if the address doesn't match, you don't get to vote. Repubs count on the fact that it is human nature not to inform the election board of your new address. They can argue 'well, it's on them if they don't inform the election committee', see it's game, so they can hide behind disingenuous claims of 'voter integrity'. See, repubs are clever, they don't 'talk' racism, they DO racism. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/georgia-purge-removes-nearly-309000-voter-registrations
Why do you suppose this is if true? Is their something about poor people, you propose, that makes them irresponsible? I see people as individuals.Apparently you see them as "categories". Guess if some vote for the wrong person, it's just because "they ain't black!" Human Nature has a lot of negatives. For instance, if there are numbers of people that are unsure how they want to vote, or even not sure they want to vote, there will always be those partisans that will use their indifference to bribe them and show them "how" to vote by mail. Democrats count on this and they are prepared to do it. Personally, I think integrity of purpose should be a requirement to vote. Of course collectively minded Democrats would say, "we'll show you how you should vote". They would always take advantage of those who would sell out their responsibility for security. Going to a voting precinct and voting is never asking too much if one takes their duty seriously. Wonder if the Democrat Party would ever consider "mail in votes" in their own primary? Why won't the House of Representatives go to a mail in voting system? Why are they required to be in Washington D.C. to vote? Wouldn't it be more "convenient" to just mail it in from their precinct?
Bad choice of words, it's not so much 'poor' as it is minorites, apartments, projects, that sort of thing. Other dynamics beyond the point of the statistical fact is irrelevant. What does that even mean? Is it a course requirement at a community college? In other words, they'll vote for whomever is promising lots of free stuff, eh? Kinda like how Trump wanted to have his name put on the check, and when he didn't get his way on that, he insisted on a letter which attempted to put the same idea in people's heads "Hi, I'm the dude who gave you the cash, you might want to vote for me because you got a $1200 freebie " The letter Trump sent out wasn't that explicit, but that is the message which was driving the reason for the letter. You really should, before you hit the 'post reply' button, should wait a day before doing it. If you had done that, you would realize, in retrospect, that your comment reeks of arrogance. You are saying that those who vote by mail aren't taking the vote serious, and in order to take it serious, it rests entirely on the fact of voting at a voting place. Not only is that a misguided, arrogant, notion, it's false on every level. It's BECAUSE I take it serious that I vote at home, where I can sit with the ballot before me, and research all the down ballot candidates I didn't know were on the ballot, the various ballot initiatives that having an machine with the internet on it affords me, that I prefer to vote at home. You could argue that i should have done that before going to a voting booth, but since I know Im' getting an absentee ballot, I make the day I do all my research on the day I vote, where research is fresh in my mind, and I'm all psyched up to do it. Every ballot I've cast since Bush / Gore race has been done by mail, including primaries. This is allowed in California, and in a number of states, and it is a beautiful way to vote, in the comfort of one's home, with the ballot before me, and the internet I can research the many down ballot candidates I knew little of, including the various ballot initiatives I didn't know was being put on the ballot. It is a great convenience, done at my leisure, not some arbitrary time some vote hating republican decides for me that I should vote which is usually some inconvenient time they hope I'll just say, 'it's too much trouble' and not vote. Yes, I could have done the research before voting in some voting place, but then I would have had to write all the stuff down as to how I'm going to vote, but what is wrong with voting at home where I can research as I vote? I watched a movie called 'Rigged", and it showed Republican Operatives explaining their methods, and their methods are racist, pure racist. One thing the movie made clear, with evidence provided, that what drives Republicans and their policies and methods, is anything but 'integrity' and everything about suppressing the vote among minorities. Spare me the lecture, please.
Of course....you've narrowed it down to the government plantation. Mastah Biden would expect their vote because if he doesn't get it.....they ain't black! So you and other Democrats take the day you receive your ballot and take only that day to decide who you'll vote for. I see. You think you can piss on my leg and tell me it's raining? If you were serious, you'd take your ballot and publicly present it in the community. Same reason most take their wedding vows in public and not in a closet.
[QUOTE="Patricio Da Silva, post: 1071725798, member: 86272"]I watched a movie called 'Rigged", and it showed Republican Operatives explaining their methods, and their methods are racist, pure racist.[/QUOTE] So you watched a movie!! Well I don't have anything more to offer. Neither does anyone else. You are now the ultimate authority!! Forgive me for disputing!!!