Stonehenge Exposed as Fraudulent

The structure at Stonehenge has been adulterated, with lintels put back in place, stones reset, and even braced with concrete, but it's not fake.

Coincidentally it's 100 years today since it was gifted to the nation. (Before then, anything on a person's land belonged to them and could be sold, broken up, or ploughed under should they desire.)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34282849

 

When I was in Stonehenge many years ago our British guide told us that it was recently moved to another location (250m / 750 ft South) to make place for the motorway anyone in England actually is proud of. It was further explained to us that "Henges" in that area are far from being uncommon, the ground around the site would contain plenty of them. Those henge locations would be well known and all are registered in a tourist map being available in the souvenir store. The only difference to the monument would be, that those henges were wooden henges and only this one had been made out of stone. The reasons for that are completely unknown, the old British having been nasty record keepers if they had any alphabet or writing at all.
There are many details in that story speaking against fabrication or fraud:
1. Lack of sensation. One criteria to identify fraud is the motivation of the fraudster to become famous. "Revolutionary and ground breaking discoveries" therefore never make it into peer reviewed journals but immediately are reported to TV and newspapers. This way fraudsters avoid objections from experts, their own justification is that "so called experts are accomplices of industry since ever attempting to silence critical voices or to avoid "true healing". Their inventions are perfect, healing cholera, cancer and heart failure and side effects are none. Their proofs are own experience and witness of knowers and one ex patient having been given up by school medicine and now being healthy like a baby again.

From my view Stonehenge being fraud would mean, there would be no "other henges", only one and that is Stonehenge.There also would be no "absence of writings". Those being able of fabricating a monument would happily produce some miraculous paper with mystical ciphers either being assumed to contain the "world formula" or being left by Aliens some 50 000 years ago. The stones wouldn't "have been moved for a highway" but "constantly are moving themselves silently, propelled by unknown forces until the place where they stand now". Unnecessary to say that the highway accident mortality where the A8 is crossing the old place is 500 times the national average and nobody knows the reasons for this.

No more irony. The message is: Stonehenge is too simple and boring to be fraud. No intelligent fraudster would do such a thing.

 

I know exactly what I am talking about which is your specific claims and statements.

You cannot and never have or ever will embrace any science all of which destroys every claim you ever made

 

Don't misquote me. I said that, according to one legend, Merlin used magic to levitate stones into place.

 

Facts are facts; I stated a fact.