Supreme Court asked to recognize a Second Amendment right to sell guns

Yes, but then, many of those in the Anti-Gun clack do the same. Hollywood education, you know. Like ARs being scary, fully auto, exhibiting bottomless mags, and the go to tool of criminals.

 

I often wished they had done that with steins of Ale !
The bottomless cup !

 

everything you've posted, was refuted.

 

Dishonest post. Give it up, you’ve lost, such further assertions just keep adding nails to the coffin of you credibility.

 

Sorry, but it was.

FYI, the Sten has nothing to do with this thread. If you want to argue about it, should probably do it in the other thread.

 

But it does lad, it proves and established the point.

 

it doesn't. The only thing established is you were wrong, but you just can't seem to move past it, so you are trying to derail this thread. It's amusing.

 

I was wrong ? lol
Talk about deflecting...
Do tell, what was I wrong about ?

 

yes

 

What is amusing is your continual pronouncement that any one sharing that presents any position related to gun rights advocacy is always wrong, having to be corrected by the formum’s expert, expertise that is never credibly established other than by declaration of baseless authority. Reminds me of the expert upon being questioned by a student, responds with the answer, ‘because I said so.’ I’ve news for you, your credibility and knowledge is far surpassed by many on this forum. Your defense of ignorance continues be amazing in its persistence; kinda troll like. Instead of putting to bed that your lack knowledge by answering the many challenges regarding autos, you continue to falsely assert you have refuted all... because, you said so. Right, I haven’t seen anyone else defend your expertise or knowledge, as I suspect, even the other GCAs recognize that you are outclassed in the discussion of autos. How can anyone take you serious on any other topic of discussion?

 

Nothing has been refuted by yourself in this discussion. Absolutely nothing whatsoever. Everything presented by yourself has been demonstrated as being factually incorrect. Stop wasting the time of others.

 

I am a gun rights advocate. You guys take it way too far, and make the rest of us look crazy. This is why you need corrected.

 

Everything you guys have presented has been, lol

 

If you are a gun Rights advocate, simply point out points of view or dissenting views, you have not done that.
I have many years of schooling and training in firearms, presenting opinions is not enough to debate those formed by decades of experience.

 

I’m trying to temper the crazy wing of gun rights advocates. You guys say some really crazy snit, and often wrong ****.

So do I.

 

Like what, specifically?

 

You are generalizing, I never advocate anything even remotely crazy, only our Constitutional Rights.

You simply argue aimlessly, you are wrong about the technical side of firearms and you are wrong about the Constitutional aspect of firearms.

There is still hope.
Stop arguing.

 

Ah sure now, go ahead correct me regarding how autos work, partuicularly how an auto sear controls the ROF; I suggested that at one point. Whether a gun rights advocate or not, BS is BS.

 

your posts seem to be quislingesque stockholm syndrome apologies for statist intrusions on our rights

 

I don’t see anyone agreeing you’ve refuted anything.

 

there is no "right" to sell guns

 

Really ?

You just by saying that, convince me,
there is.

 

states and cities have the right to license all who so business.

which means there is no natural right to engage in business.

the state has the right to regulate you.

 

The King of England said that, and "We the People" said No Way !

Rights are of "The People" the State has no Rights, only Power and Authority.

Again, you fail to make an actual point Ron, except to prove slavish devotion to the false Religion of Gun Control.

 

They certainly do for every other business