The 1% love their lefists minons

Jackster · Apr 5, 2014

Under Socialism, you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live, you would have to live well.

No doubt i'll get much protest from leftists...... but socialism favors the 1% and world elites, which isnt surprising given its designed by them for their own global domination. I will say straight up however, that it isnt just so called left wing parties (although they're completely committed to its goals), but its clearly infiltrated many RW parties, as clear evidence by either their actions and lack of actions.

We live in a world where things arent what they seem, the great deception is its socialism Vs capitalism. Its painted that those who favor freely and voluntarily trading their time, skills ect (otherwise coined as capitalism which Karl Marx made a popular ism) are in fact for those who serve the 1%/ elites. A simple magicians trick, look for the problem over there while the real action is happening elsewhere.

Lets assume you're an elite or even a mere 1%er, you've gained much wealth and political power, what would be your goal? Well of course its to maintain that position, monopolize, grow...ensure that dominance for as long as possible. Constantly buying political power to monopolize is costly, time consuming and no guarantee. But your own authoritarian controlled govt? Almost unstoppable. Your own authoritarian WORLD govt.......completely unstoppable.

There is perhaps no better way to see through it than to look into the Fabian Society. They believe in socialism via gradualism rather than revolution, which is exactly what we see today.

Contrary to current political mythology (or disinformation) which has it that Socialism was a working-class movement, the fact is that it originated with the liberal capitalist middle classes where the Fabian Society was at home.

The leading elements of liberal capitalism – the big businessmen, industrialists and bankers – who had amassed great wealth on the back of the industrial revolution, aimed to strengthen their position of power and influence by two means: (1) by monopolising finance, economy and politics; and (2) by controlling the growing urban working class.

While the monopolisation of finance, economy and politics could only be achieved by the centralisation of capital, means of production, etc., the working class could only be controlled through organisation and promises of a larger share in resources. These measures formed the core of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’ Manifesto of the Communist Party (184. Both authors were middle class and Engels, Marx’s financial supporter, was a wealthy textile industrialist.
Click to expand...

The Fabian logos:

Deception, The wolf in sheeps clothing
Gradualism. the Tortoise ' when i strike i strike hard'

The Fabian glass window: Remould it nearer to the hearts desire. Depicting George Bernard Shaw and Sidney Webb hammering (remoulding) the world.

George Bernard Shaw "Under Socialism, you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live, you would have to live well."
Click to expand...

Well that quote shouldnt be a surprise to any of us, after all socialist always champion giving away liberty and power to the all knowing elites in exchange for a promised utopia. They pretend to be the champions of the worker yet seek serfdom for them and have no place for those who dont or cant contribute to their collective.

Become serfs and we'll promise to treat you well.......umm yeah right.

Dont think they hold any power?

The Fabian Society, the Labour Party and Fabian control of the working classes

Rothschild, Rockefeller and allied interests were the primary moving force behind liberal (i.e., left-wing) initiatives like “free trade,” “world peace,” “universal brotherhood” and “world organisation,” inexorably leading to the abolition of national sovereignty and the imposition of world government. They were also behind Socialism as a device for bribing and controlling the working class through operations like the Fabian Society and the Milner Group.

That Britain’s working classes “were not going to rush into Socialism” had long been discovered by the Fabian leadership – as Fabian Society Secretary Edward R. Pease candidly admitted. Therefore the first task of the Society was to capture the working classes for its own ends. A step in this direction was the formation of the Independent Labour Party (ILP).

Another political organisation serving the same purpose was the Labour Party. Set up in 1900 by Keir Hardie and fellow Socialists, the Labour Party was known as the “Labour Representation Committee” for the first few years of its existence. That it was not representing labour is evident from the middle-class Fabians involved in its formation who included Bernard Shaw, Sidney Webb and Edward R. Pease. From inception, Pease, one of the Fabian Society founders, sat on the Labour Party Executive followed by Sidney Webb and others.
Click to expand...

Hey look its none other than Tony Blair (Labour), what a lovely window he has there!

Tony Blair spoke about the remarkable way the Fabians influenced the Labour party, not just in its creation but also in its economic, political and intellectual development.

Director of LSE Howard Davies said: 'It is a great honour for the School to have this piece of national heritage on campus. The window will be a visible reminder to students, staff and visitors of the School's historical links with Shaw, the Webbs and other Fabians, whose ideas continue to influence our thinking about society, economics and politics.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_Window
Click to expand...

The Fabian Society and World Government

Outside Britain, the Fabian Society’s ultimate goal – which it has pursued through the Labour Party and other front organisations like the Socialist International and the United Nations – has been the establishment of a Socialist World Government (Ratiu, 2012).

The UN was created in 1944 as a successor to the Milner-Fabian League of Nations with the involvement of the Fabian Socialist Rockefellers and their Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and, from inception, was dominated by Socialists with links to the Socialist International like Paul-Henri Spaak, Trygve Lie, Dag Hammarskjold and many others.

The Socialist International itself was created in 1951 by the London Fabian Society as the successor to Karl Marx’s First International. Its main function has been to co-ordinate the Socialist movement worldwide, in particular, with a view to establishing world government and promoting the UN as the central instrument for this:

“The ultimate objective of the parties of the Socialist International is nothing less than world government. As a first step towards it, they seek to strengthen the United Nations so that it may become more and more effective … Membership of the United Nations must be made universal” (“The World Today: The Socialist Perspective,” Declaration of the Socialist International Oslo Conference, 2-4 June 1962).

This was parroted by Socialist parties (and governments) around the world, the British Labour Party at the forefront:

“Labour remained faithful to its long-term belief in the establishment of east-west co-operation as the basis for a strengthened United Nations developing towards world government … For us world government is the final objective and the United Nations the chosen instrument …” (Labour Party manifesto 1964).
Click to expand...

Of course we'll hear no no this is not what Karl Marx stood for, yet he was funded by wealthy businessman Friedrich Engels.

We see US bankers funding Trotsky from the start, US support from the highest levels including major US corporations stepping in almost from the outset.

Bankers Love Socialism -- Professor Antony Sutton
[video=youtube;vftNpSXUOU8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vftNpSXUOU8[/video]

Then we see Progressive elites such as George Soros championing the EU. All supporting bodies collectivizing political power.

Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, Grandfather of the EU,
Click to expand...

In 1922 he founded the “Pan-European” movement in Vienna, which aimed to create a New World Order, based on a federation of nations led by the United States. European integration would be the first step in creating a world government. Among the first supporters, including Czech politicians Tomáš Masaryk and Edvard Beneš and the banker Max Warburg, who invested the first 60,000 marks.

Coudenhove-Kalergi in his autobiography:

"At the beginning of 1924, we received a call from Baron Louis de Rothschild; one of his friends, Max Warburg from Hamburg, had read my book and wanted to get to know us. To my great surprise, Warburg spontaneously offered us 60,000 gold marks, to tide the movement over for its first three years ....
Max Warburg, who was one of the most distinguished and wisest men that I have ever come into contact with, had a principle of financing these movements. He remained sincerely interested in Pan-Europe for his entire life. Max Warburg arranged his 1925 trip to the United States to introduce me to Paul Warburg and financier Bernard Baruch."
Click to expand...

As clearly illustrated the global elites, particularly bankers have always had their fingerprints all over the socialist global movements. It stands to reason really, centralization of money and power to maintain their corporate control. Central/ fed banks, IMF/ world banks are front and center of it.

Now as i said they're clearly these elites pushing for globalization on both sides of politics. But the idea of giving away your liberty, sovereignty, right to self determination to some elites that promise you a bigger/ fairer share? Thats plain idiotic. Thats simply gulping down that Fabian kool aid never suspecting the wolf in sheeps clothing.
.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_Window
http://fabiansociety.wordpress.com/
http://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013...gi-plan-the-genocide-of-the-people-of-europe/