The 1st Amendment is being torn apart by hypocrisy...

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Cougarbear, Jan 27, 2021.

  1. Pred

    Pred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    24,429
    Likes Received:
    17,419
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Guess that depends on who you define as asshats. People calling Trump Hitler and a white supremacist would be asshats, which includes public officials by the way. And advertisers wouldn't be “afraid” of supporting said internet company if there weren’t Leftist organizations and politicians bent on destroying the advertisers that dared to support those they don’t like. Quite a lot of damage can be done when it’s organized like Media Matters with a horde of Twitter minions who can say nearly anything they want without any chance of censorship.

    People like you just can’t wrap their heads around what the consequences are when nearly every news organization and Democrat politician starts calling you racist or a white supremacist or terrorist. When there is such a mass agreement in what is wrong speak, there in lies the issue of a monopoly on speech and what constitutes “free”. It’s no longer free when dirt bag politicians and news organizations start claiming that anyone who voted for Trump is by association a murderer, because of just a small group. Just imagine if everyone who supports BLM is instantly responsible for the deaths and billions of dollars they have caused? Doesn’t matter if it’s only a relative fraction of the total BLM protesters. ALL are responsible for the few in Leftist land now.

    The danger of that sort of speech and labels is exactly what started Jews in Germany on their way to gas chambers. And the populace just went along with it, some quietly and others to thunderous applause. It’s exactly what some Democrat politicians are doing now, trying to remove parting the population from the rest of society. First remove their ability to speak on social media. Doing it now! Then remove news sources they don’t approve of. Democrat politicians are currently pushing to remove Fox and OAN from cable networks.

    Ben Shapiro for fracks sake is called a white supremacist and he’s JEWISH!!! Apparently Leftist journalists aren’t aware how much the KKK Hates Jews:)

    Democrats truly don’t understand the damage they’re causing right now.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2021
    altmiddle, glitch and joesnagg like this.
  2. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Victim complex.
     
    Cosmo and mdrobster like this.
  3. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,235
    Likes Received:
    63,418
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Republicans want to control corporations and force them to publish their propaganda - that is not what free speech is about

    you free to find you on a corner on the public street and speak, your not free to force other people to spread your message

    now, if you want the government to run the internet and be the ISP's, then you would have a point.. but that would be socialism right?
     
    peacelate, Cosmo and maxLiberal like this.
  4. HonestJoe

    HonestJoe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    14,891
    Likes Received:
    4,868
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That isn't true. Social media companies restricting user access based on their terms of service has absolutely nothing to do with the First Amendment. There are ongoing political debates about whether it should (though only in the US of course) but it doesn't at the moment. It's no different to nightclubs having dress codes or a restaurant kicking out a loud and disruptive group.

    The actions of the bakeries refusing equal service to same-sex couples isn't directly related to the First Amendment either. That was only brought in because the owners presented religious freedom as a defence but various court rulings have fairly consistently concluded that such freedoms are not unconditional and don't allow for a special exemption from public accommodation anti-discrimination laws.
     
    mdrobster likes this.
  5. Kat236

    Kat236 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2019
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    343
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Until it happens to you
     
    joesnagg likes this.
  6. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If I am on Facebook and have my own page and if Facebook is using my data then my page is not theirs. If they do not like what I post on MY PAGE then they can kick me off but I want all my data and any money they made from it returned.
     
  7. maxLiberal

    maxLiberal Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2021
    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    425
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    don't play on their property if their rules don't suit you, they owe 0
     
  8. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No it doesn't. Advertisers can take their business elsewhere. They are not "forced" to do anything.
     
    joesnagg likes this.
  9. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I see. So if they wanted to ban blacks and gays you would be totally on board with it.....sad.
     
  10. maxLiberal

    maxLiberal Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2021
    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    425
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    if were they doing the same things that got others banned, why not?
     
  11. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL! Nice try. What you are saying is a company has the right to ban anyone they want....well, if a company bans someone because they are black or gay you would support that.....again, sad.
     
    joesnagg likes this.
  12. maxLiberal

    maxLiberal Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2021
    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    425
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    it's behavior that matters, not everything goes, they regulate their property. how would they know or care what race / sex the user is?
     
  13. Mandelus

    Mandelus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2015
    Messages:
    12,410
    Likes Received:
    2,689
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What a bunch of bullshit ... Is Twitter, Facebook and all the other social networks in any form a public space? The answer is clearly NO! So when using this media, the terms of use with which you agree when registering also apply. If you do not like these user regulations, everyone has the right to decide not to register and not to use these platforms.

    This forum is also such a social platform ... and here, too, there are rules that contradict your denounced right to the 1st addition! Either you accept the rules of the forum or you are free not to use this forum. And if you break the rules, then the same thing happens to you as Trump on Twitter ultimately ... up to and including "you are fired" if the management of the forum deems it appropriate! Damn it ... all that idiotic and stupid chatter about Freedom of Speech on social media. Slowly it only gets annoying to mess around with people who have no idea about the law and the constitution!
     
  14. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure because no one posts pics on Facebook.....get real. Your pretzel logic has revealed that you support banning someone because of any reason. If those white supremacists start their own social media companies there is no doubt you would support them.
     
    joesnagg likes this.
  15. joesnagg

    joesnagg Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2020
    Messages:
    4,749
    Likes Received:
    6,801
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Sure he would! :roflol:
     
    doombug likes this.
  16. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,464
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    So, not only should FB provide you a cool website to interact, but they should also do it for free and without any rules?
     
  17. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You think they do it for free? LOL! Such a sweet kid!

    Facebook uses MY DATA and makes money off advertising which ends up on MY PAGE. See how it works?
     
  18. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,464
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    That is your cost for using the service.

    You are the person who wants FB to provide you a service for free. Do you work for free?
     
  19. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL! Facebook, YouTube, etc...make money from user content. If you are using it then it is a cost.
     
  20. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,464
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Who is paying FB money so they can look at what you are having for dinner? Nobody.

    FB targets the ads so you don't see things that aren't relevant to you. A 60-year old man doesn't need to see about the coolest new diaper. Advertisers make money by targeting their ad based on what you might buy.

    If you don't like the cost of using FB, here's an idea - don't use FB.

    Do you go to a grocery store and tell the manager that you don't like the cost of their steak, so they should give it to you for free? Of course you don't.
     
  21. maxLiberal

    maxLiberal Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2021
    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    425
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    hater pity pits have been canceled and corrected lately, if they start up again they'll face similar issues, I'm fine with that cos I'd never go there except to harass the goobers lol then get my free speech curtailed cos they can't handle anything but their echoes of BS. facebook targets me for incorrigible honesty with auto-jail for 30days every time a braveheart complains about their feelings being hurt, so don't whine about how platforms run their biz.
     
  22. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The ads on my page.....that is what is paying. Hahaha!
     
  23. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who is whining? I am simply pointing out how you would support a white supremacist platform.
     
  24. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,464
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Yes. Now you are catching on.
     
  25. maxLiberal

    maxLiberal Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2021
    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    425
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    as a white supremacist I can assure you I have 0 interest or desire to join such a thing supportive of such ideals. ban'm.
     

Share This Page