The answer to stopping mass murder by the diabolically disenchanted is?

Discussion in 'Opinion POLLS' started by DixNickson, Aug 5, 2019.

?

Do you believe new laws and bans are the answer to mass murder?

  1. Yes-more laws and bans have always been the answer!

    1 vote(s)
    5.6%
  2. No-the human heart/mind, despite laws or bans, is free to choose evil or good.

    11 vote(s)
    61.1%
  3. Decipher the specific cause(s) and a implent a definitive, corrective action plan.

    4 vote(s)
    22.2%
  4. I have absolutely no idea!

    2 vote(s)
    11.1%
  5. I'll put my faith in our politicians to know what's best for me and mine!

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. I'll put my faith in God and defend me and mine with my God-given and enumerated 2A right.

    3 vote(s)
    16.7%
  7. Get rid of all the laws presently not keeping us safe and write one that does and is constitutional.

    2 vote(s)
    11.1%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Hotdogr

    Hotdogr Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    11,052
    Likes Received:
    5,276
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Once you have resigned yourself to the fact that all kinds of destructive weapons are easy to acquire for anyone who has their liberty, and that they always will be, you are left with the realization that the ONLY way to prevent mass murder is to identify those bent on destruction and incarcerate them before they commit the crime.

    Since segregating people from society BEFORE they have committed a crime is not something that should be done in the land of freedom and liberty, then we are left with the conclusion that, unless we become comfortable with government locking up people who they feel MIGHT commit a mass murder some time in the future, then there is nothing else government can do to prevent them.
     
    TrackerSam and vman12 like this.
  2. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ...and is the same as the 50's.
     
  3. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually, most of these mass shootings were preventable with existing laws.

    Parkland was the most preventable shooting in US history, for example.

    Then there was the guy in Illinois who shot up the Pratt plant....they issued a FOID to a felon.

    Government incompetence is the problem, and people think the solution is to give the government more power.
     
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2019
    Hotdogr likes this.
  4. undertheice

    undertheice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    1,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    freedom and responsibility go hand in hand and this is all dependent on choice. security is always an illusion, but a popular illusion. when the drones cry out for more laws, they are dependent upon the violence of the state to save them from the possibility of violence from their fellow man. when the free men demand access to the means to provide for their own defense, they are denying both the violence of the state and the possible violence of their fellow man. the only violence they are embracing is their own and then only when it is required. the free man's security may be no less illusory than the drone's, but that illusion is a matter of choice and not dependence.
     
    vman12 and Hotdogr like this.
  5. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The drones are also blissfully unaware that the police have no legal requirement to protect or save you.
     
  6. undertheice

    undertheice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    1,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    that's part of their illusion. they actually think the state's violence, an every day occurrence, is preferable to the occasional violence of their fellow men. theirs is a lose/lose situation. they would give up their most basic right to protect themselves, invest that right in an uncaring state and become a dependent of a faceless bureaucracy. believing in the power of democracy, they become victims of their own ignorance. in and of itself, i have no problem with this. the more drones that die in pools of their own piss and blood the better. what bothers me is that there may be enough of these fools to affect the fate of millions of men who would choose to be free.
     
    vman12 likes this.
  7. Blaster3

    Blaster3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2018
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    5,302
    Trophy Points:
    113
    quite simple, really... just get rid of the masses...
     
  8. Heartburn

    Heartburn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2015
    Messages:
    13,576
    Likes Received:
    5,005
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My hypothesis is American military power kept things in order.
     
  9. Sallyally

    Sallyally Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2017
    Messages:
    15,863
    Likes Received:
    28,298
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Yep, the basis for our laws (which are commonsense guidelines for a society), but practicing religious observers are in a minority.
    Religion in the west is irrelevant now.
     
  10. Crawdadr

    Crawdadr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    7,293
    Likes Received:
    1,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If they could show me a law that would actually prevent mass murderers from murdering I would be interested. But so far I see nothing but feel good legislation that even if enacted before these shootings happened would not have prevented them from happening. In the end I just do not see taking the rights from others in response to bad people doing bad things as a legitimate response. Government should be protecting and enhancing our rights not taking them away.
     
    TrackerSam likes this.
  11. Dispondent

    Dispondent Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    34,260
    Likes Received:
    8,086
    Trophy Points:
    113
  12. TrackerSam

    TrackerSam Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    12,114
    Likes Received:
    5,379
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But those are mostly accidents. Apples and oranges. Mass murders are not accidents.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2019
  13. Robert E Allen

    Robert E Allen Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2018
    Messages:
    12,041
    Likes Received:
    5,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Murder by drinking and driving is not an accident.

    No different than shooting randomly into a crowd, after all you might miss.
     
  14. PanMonarchist

    PanMonarchist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    644
    Likes Received:
    640
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    I say reopen the asylums
     
  15. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,671
    Likes Received:
    27,206
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ... to stop arming them.

    Most shooters aren't low-functioning enough to be housed in some asylum, and there is generally no basis for robbing them of their liberty until they act out. Added to that, it would be another massive taxpayer expense to lock up the vast number of wacko Trump supporters out there.
     
  16. SiNNiK

    SiNNiK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2014
    Messages:
    10,432
    Likes Received:
    4,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Return fire.
     

Share This Page