The Bad News for Ron Paul Haters

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by AbsoluteVoluntarist, Jan 5, 2012.

  1. AbsoluteVoluntarist

    AbsoluteVoluntarist New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    5,364
    Likes Received:
    102
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As they feast on the candied carcass of Lady Liberty, the partisans of despotism giggle at their triumph in yet again sabotaging the insufferable gynecologist's kooky and outside-the-mainstream quest to save the lives of scores of Middle Eastern children and rescue the jury trial from becoming a quaint relic of a bygone age. But the sand in the glass in dwindling against Knights of the Order of St. Business As Usual...


    CNN Iowa Caucus--Vote by Age

    --------------Paul..........Santorum.......Romney
    17-24.........50%..........21%..............13%
    25-29.........45%..........27%..............12%
    30-39.........34%..........30%..............17%
    40-49.........17%..........25%..............23%
    50-64.........15%..........27%..............26%
    65+...........11%..........20%..............33%

    Source


    Valiantly these pestilential paladins man the barricades, cranking that smear machine, spinning those facts, duping those dolts, spreading that Santorum. But, in the fullness of time, their frenzy will be naught, as, one by one, the Angel of Death claims each and every soul whose mental image of a well-informed voter is Dad twisting the rabbit ears each evening at six because Cronkite is America's sweetheart. When they are gone, the Fortress of Decrepit Old State will surely fall to Crazy Old Uncle and those meddling kids.

    Looks like it's time...to censor the Internet :flame::flame::flame:
     
  2. The XL

    The XL Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,569
    Likes Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The youth, specifically 17-29, and some 30 somethings, are the only ones not corrupted and brainwashed by the system. It's funny when older people talk about how ignorant the young are, when it's the other way around
     
  3. AbsoluteVoluntarist

    AbsoluteVoluntarist New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    5,364
    Likes Received:
    102
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's why issue #1 is to keep the Internet free and open.
     
  4. puffin

    puffin Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2008
    Messages:
    5,792
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It will be interesting to see what % of Blacks vote for Obama this time. My guess is the Black turnout will go back to a near pre-Obama percent. This time the first time voters won't be 'first time voters'. They will be four years older and wiser and increasingly unemployed/under employed. Look for a second time voter percentage to return to the pre-Obama percent. The 'first time voter' who bothers to follow politics has had years of Internet access and they are keenly aware how ineffectual Obama and his ludicrous stimulus debacle was/is. Green energy? Can you spell Solyndra? Gitmo? Sorry LIBs. The 'youth vote' ain't going to be there this time.
     
  5. Dr. Righteous

    Dr. Righteous Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    10,545
    Likes Received:
    213
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    ^This. We are living in the golden age of internet right now. The elite are trying to get their hands on it. Mark my words, they are going to succeed.
     
  6. MaxGeorgeDicksteinXXXI

    MaxGeorgeDicksteinXXXI New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,776
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If internet shuts down, there will be fire bombs in washington.
     
  7. The XL

    The XL Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,569
    Likes Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yeah, they are trying to shut the internet down to brainwash the young, because they know when the sub 18 year olds eventually come to legal voting age and when the old die off, we will have a massive advantage. Every year, a bunch of old people that are part of the establishment die off, and non brainwashed 17 year olds turn 18. They know we will eventually overwhelm them, that's why they're hellbent on censoring the internet. We can't let that happen.
     
  8. Shiva_TD

    Shiva_TD Progressive Libertarian Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    45,715
    Likes Received:
    885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    http://democracysouth.org/vcmwp/?p=53

    The problem is that the majority of younger voters don't vote even in the presidential elections and their representation in the primaries is basically non-existant. When it comes to Republican primaries they are basically dominated by the "Social Conservatives" comprised of the "Christian Right" that support an authoritarian role of government in establishing a goverment based upon the Bible as opposed to the US Constitution.

    Nice statistics but unless the younger voter choose to exercise their franchise to vote they are a meaningless group.
     
  9. Trinnity

    Trinnity Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    10,645
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They're also naive. They voted for Obama last time - a Marxist.

    This time they got it right. Ron Paul is a man of constitutional principles - something rare indeed.
     
  10. Wildjoker5

    Wildjoker5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,237
    Likes Received:
    4,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It was a lot more than just the young vote that was naive about Obama. Most people that voted for him didn't know any of his positions. All they knew was "Sarar Palin can see Russia from her house."
     
  11. highlander

    highlander Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2008
    Messages:
    5,104
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBx__69pkpY&feature=player_embedded"]2012 Election RIGGED - This is going Viral - YouTube[/ame]

    Will it matter who votes and for whom?

    Regards
    Highlander
     
  12. Shiva_TD

    Shiva_TD Progressive Libertarian Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    45,715
    Likes Received:
    885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is probably true that Obama won in 2008 because of the Republican candidates (McCain/Palin) presented a greater "evil" to America than Obama presented. For most voters, as in all recent elections, it was a selection of the "lesser of two evils" as opposed to voting for a candidate that would actually be good for America. It looks like that will also be the case in 2012 which is why the Republican candidates will probably lose. Ron Paul might have stood a chance against Obama but Romney and Santorum do not. They (Romney and Perry) won't capture the independent vote because of their desire to impose religious beliefs on America in violation of the Constitution and the independent vote is absolutely necessary to win the election.
     

Share This Page