To climate lemmings such as yourself, ANY weather event "reinforces" "climate change". You believe in a nonsensical religion that denies logic, science, and mathematics. Just because it's hot when you wake up in the freakin summer time doesn't mean AGW is real. See how religious beliefs work? It is not possible to measure Earth's temperature to any usable accuracy. The Climatologists are just making schiff up and telling you that you should live your life in fear. The Church of Global Warming (or Climate Change, if you prefer), The Church of Green, and the Church of Covid are no different in that regard. They all fear monger and want people to be living in a constant state of fear. Such fear is ungodly. ........ consisting entirely of made up numbers, since it is NOT POSSIBLE to measure the temperature of Earth to any usable accuracy. We don't have enough thermometers, and they are not uniformly spaced and simultaneously read by the same observer. Location and time biases affect such temperature readings...
... or maybe do some independent research instead of believing whatever a particular source tells you?
You really need to reference climate science before you make so many bold uniformed statements. There is nothing you have said that agrees with any of our government agencies tasked with climate science nor any of the 3400 universities in the world and their science departments. it’s really unique that you few delusional deniers claim to be so smart. Deniers make statements that an 8 year old would make. It’s like deniers have never been exposed to technology. Sad and pitiful.
The AAAS is not a particular source. They are tasked with summing the evidence of all the climate science institutions. They are the LARGEST science organization in the world membership wise. You’re fking grabbing at straws.
Laughable response. You deniers never once reference any institutional science, just grab a$$ fake news from the wizzard.
"Climate science" is just a meaningless buzzword. You are not saying anything of substance when you use it. So? Only a person who has outsourced their thinking to others makes such appeals to "experts". I AM smart, and smarter than whoever does your thinking for you, because they are denying Statistical Mathematics (as well as science and logic).
They are a particular source. They just put their own twist on other people's made-up numbers. Big deal.
How about NASA, NSC and the rest of the 17 security agencies, every accredited university in the world and every Government in the world. They all “ particular”? Seriously, I doubt deniers know what the AAAS is without looking it up. None of the deniers here even know what AGW is about to begin with. I haven’t heard one denier do anything but make up sht to counter an argument they think exist, but has little to do with AGW. But they can cut and paste and make up sht.
I think its a case of not being able to let go. That peculiar situation where having taken a position they are unable to admit they were wrong and therefore look steadily more and more ridiculous.
For sure. I think it’s for a variety of reasons, not the least of which just disagreeing with liberals. Mostly though , if they thought money was involved, they can be convinced of anything. Besides, math and science are hard. I think it just hurts their head.
Aren’t you embarrassed at all ? You’re claiming you’re smarter then the AAAS and NASA and every government agency in every industrialized country in the world. Are you that smart ?
Watch or not. http://quiltingdigest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/dd973633582b5421437bf2d83a9c4367.jpg
Yes, and they all make up numbers all the same. We don't have enough thermometers to measure Earth's temperature to any usable accuracy. This is a mathematics issue, not a "denier" issue. I know what the AGW theory claims, and what it claims is in direct contradiction to numerous laws of science. Make an argument about AGW and I will refute it for the science denial that it is.
Dear oh dear. Who on earth do you expect to believe that twaddle. We measure temperature all round the planet thousands of times a day from satellites.
Are you embarrassed? You claim authority over the output of others you've never checked or otherwise have any personal experience having done so. Are you the example you refer to here? It seems as much. And in your criticism of others, you're assuming the authority of others to do so, and no having provided any of your own bona fides in terms of how you are credible in both your assumption of, and your use of the output of others. That seems pretty problematic for you and your narrative.
I am smarter than any person who appeals to (or generates) made-up numbers to claim that Earth is warming. I am also smarter than any person who appeals to logic, science, and math denial in order to claim that "greenhouse gases" (whatever that is, but CO2 is typically mentioned as the "main culprit") are defying the 2nd LoT, acting as if ice cubes are put into water to make it hotter. If you believe that Earth is warmer due to "greenhouse gases" in its atmosphere, then riddle me this: Why is the daytime side of the Earth (with its "greenhouse gas infused" atmosphere) so much COLDER than the daytime side of the Moon (without any appreciable atmosphere full of "greenhouse gases")???
