The Diversity Experiment Has Failed Spectacularly...Bring Back The BEST QUALIFIED People!!

For the senior team yes. Because iAccomodate and am no capitalist.

 

Which is why socialism almost always fails.

 

Which is why capitalism almost always fails

 

Capitalism is economic freedom. It only fails when government thinks it knows better.

 

Capitalism is about poverty and a tiny minority of mega rich.

 

Totally wrong.

 

Exactly correct. Great Depression started by a trade war of which Smoot-Hawley was only the best known of dozen of bullets fired world wide.

 

Nope that is socialism and the mega rich are the governing class. Capitalism is every one gas a chance. It's millions of small businesses starting succeeding or failing and starting again, Mega corporations are the creation of FDR during the Great Depression.

 

Capitalism needs mass poverty to succeed. For there is no wealth without poverty. That's simple logic.

No love without hate, you know how it goes..

 

Nope Socialism requires mass poverty to keep people dependent on government for their survival. Capitalism creates and destroys wealth socialism only the latter. Precisely why leftists think wealth is static is one of those absurd mysteries that confound thinking people the world over.

 

For anyone that thinks DEI is a good idea, I want your pledge, right here and now, that if you or your children or parents have to get dangerous surgery, that you asked for the most ethnic doctor instead of the most qualified one (it could happen to be both of course, but i want you to pledge to make that choice SOLELY on diversity and NOT experience & skill.
If you don't make the pledge its basically the same as admitting DEI IS A FAILURE

ready...............GO!!!!!

 

History says your wrong.

 

You're just repeating what I'm saying.

 

You know, I've been on this forum for about a dozen years, and that has to qualify as one of the dumbest statements about economics I've read on this forum, and believe me, the competition is stiff!

I don't think you really believe it.

 

For there is no wealth without poverty.

That's true.

 

It's contagious.

 

Truth, I hope so.

 

Clearly you don't understand what capitalism actually means let alone logic. The etymology is the hint..

 

In U.S. universities, there exists a longstanding tradition of admitting not only the academically gifted but also the offspring of the wealthiest or most influential politicians, regardless of their intellectual capabilities. Do you genuinely believe that G.W. Bush was accepted into Yale because of his exceptional academic prowess?

The reality is that there exists a significant disparity between people of color and white individuals. However, a cost-effective method to bridge this gap involves admitting students with less impressive academic records, provided they possess the appropriate skin color. This strategy can potentially reduce crime rates and welfare costs.

That being said, there are more effective methods to address this gap. However, these alternatives come with a higher price tag, requiring increased salaries for educators in underprivileged neighborhoods, greater investment in educational infrastructure, and the expansion of social programs.

If you are prepared to support higher taxes to fund such initiatives, consider proposing this idea to your congressional representative or senator.

 

Nope! If you check the richest countries in the world, you will see the capitalism succeed there without mass poverty, like the US or Western European countries.
https://gfmag.com/data/richest-countries-in-the-world/

If you check what happened to ex-communist countries, you will see that capitalism made these countries richer. China raised millions of people from deep poverty by accepting capitalist economy - and those are true facts.
True, capitalism did not succeed in Haiti and some African countries, but the reason is that these countries have corrupted elite who cares only about themself and people are poorly educated who don't know how to fight for their right.
Here are countries with the highest Gini Coefficient:
https://www.datapandas.org/ranking/gini-coefficient-by-country

 

I think Mr. Esau believe it, many communists believe it. In communist countries it was standard explanation why the standard of living in communists countries is lower than the standard of living in Western democratic countries.

 

that's because capitalism exports poverty. There is a reason why the majority are in a cost of living crisis while the minority becomes even richer.

The White Jewish Europeans (WJE) benefit the most from this situation because capitalism is their speciality and subjecting goyim to poverty is seen as success in their community because it makes them richer at the expense of goyim due to the fact that there is no wealth without poverty.

 

How did I guess that your response will be blaming White European Jews?
Don't feel bad, I was not 100% right - I expected you will add the magic word "Ashkenazi", so I was not 100%, but only 90%
:------)

 

here's a thought;
Maybe because the WJE prioritize financial gain above anything else ....

 

Yup, he's man-splainin'!

DEI = "Didn't Earn It"