The Fraud of the "sinking" Pacific Islands

Discussion in 'Science' started by LaDairis, May 15, 2016.

  1. LaDairis

    LaDairis Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You've read it, you've heard it.

    The Solomon Islands and the Marshall Islands are "sinking" in the Pacific Ocean "because of" "rising" sea levels from Algore's hoax...

    but the Hawaiians, New Zealand, Catalina, Galapagos etc., well, they're not sinking....

    So what's up there. Why are those two island chains sinking while virtually nothing else is? Rising sea levels? Wouldn't that sink every piece of land, not just a few the media likes to lie about???

    Correct Jeopardy!! answer - what is the PACIFIC RING OF FIRE ???

    The warmers cherry pick islands right on the lip of the Pacific Ring of Fire, where the tectonic plate at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean is being pushed under the plate on the other side of the Ring. When that plate pushes, it also goes down. In two million years, the Marshall Islands will not just be under the ocean, they will be a gob of lava under the Earth's crust, and sea levels will be several feet below current levels...
     
  2. robot

    robot Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    545
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    28
  3. LaDairis

    LaDairis Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You are missing the point entirely.

    The issue is that the "top climate scientists" are attempting to blame "sea level rise" for "sinking" islands attached to a tectonic plate that is going down 1 to 2 inches per year. That is fraud, not science. It takes science to out fraud. There is no sea level rise. In fact, the satellites show slight ocean drop. To show a "sea level rise," the "warmers" have deliberately cherry picked islands sinking due to plate tectonics. That is why those islands are sinking but nothing else is.
     
  4. tecoyah

    tecoyah Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    28,370
    Likes Received:
    9,297
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No One claims Islands are "sinking" as that is not possible. Areas of ocean depth vary depending on current and topography. Warmer waters create more volume than cold does.
     
  5. LaDairis

    LaDairis Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2015/06/opinions/sutter-two-degrees-marshall-islands/


    "YOU'RE MAKING THIS ISLAND DISAPPEAR
    It's one of the clearest injustices of climate change: The Marshall Islands likely won't exist if we warm the planet 2 degrees."


    OK, the word is "disappear" not "sink," but the meaning in context is the same.

    The Marshall Islands are "disappearing" because you consume fossil fuels...

    nevermind the Pacific Ring of Fire....
     
  6. mamooth

    mamooth Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    6,490
    Likes Received:
    2,225
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You're pretty much the only person on the planet who says the whole Pacific Ocean basin is sinking. Hence, you'll need to show some hard data backing up your claim before it's taken seriously.

    You'll also need to explain why sea levels are rising by the same amount across the whole globe. Is the entire world somehow sinking?

    And you'll also need to explain the satellite altimetry, which would have detected any sinking land masses. It showed no such thing. What's your explanation for that?
     
  7. longknife

    longknife New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2012
    Messages:
    6,840
    Likes Received:
    131
    Trophy Points:
    0
  8. Deckel

    Deckel Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2014
    Messages:
    17,608
    Likes Received:
    2,043
    Trophy Points:
    113
  9. LaDairis

    LaDairis Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL!!!

    That's why I say above that Hawaii, NZ etc. are not sinking...

    LOL!!!

    Only on "the lip" of the Pacific Ring of Fire, which is where the Solomons and the Marshalls are...

    https://www.google.com/search?q=pac...gQsAQIOQ&biw=1440&bih=791&safe=active&ssui=on


    What happens there, on that lip??

    http://www.universetoday.com/59341/pacific-ring-of-fire/


    "Also known as the circum-Pacific belt, the “Ring of Fire” is a 40,000 km (25,000 mile) horseshoe-shaped basin that is associated with a nearly continuous series of oceanic trenches, volcanic arcs, and volcanic belts and/or plate movements."

    "Tectonic Activity:
    The Ring of Fire is the direct result of plate tectonics and the movement and collisions of lithospheric plates. These plates, which constitute the outer layer of the planet, are constantly in motion atop the mantle. Sometimes they collide, pull apart, or slide alongside each other; resulting in convergent boundaries, divergent boundaries, and transform boundaries.

    The Pacific Ring of Fire, a string of volcanic regions extending from the South Pacific to South America. Credit: Public Domain
    The Pacific Ring of Fire, a string of volcanic regions extending from the South Pacific to South America. Credit: Public Domain
    In the case of the former, subduction zones are often the result, where the heavier plate slips under the lighter plate – forming a deep trench. This subduction changes the dense mantle into buoyant magma, which rises through the crust to the Earth’s surface. Over millions of years, this rising magma creates a series of active volcanoes known as a volcanic arc."
     
  10. LaDairis

    LaDairis Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In plain English, one plate goes under the other, and everything attached to that plate such as islands goes down with it...

    Yes, it is an inch plus per year, but that's the rate the islands mentioned are sinking at, while nothing else is sinking at all...

    Since the tippy toppiests are busted here, they just have their lapper mutt mammmoooo lying instead of parroting...
     
  11. mamooth

    mamooth Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    6,490
    Likes Received:
    2,225
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yet sea level is going up just as much in those spots.

    How does your theory explain that?

    Oh, stop the namecalling. I won't give you another warning.
     
  12. LaDairis

    LaDairis Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Nobody living in Hawaii believes that. Nobody. Try to have some DATA next time, instead of the standard PARROTING and LYING...
     
  13. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Islands in the Pacific only a couple of feet above sea level should be considered uninhabitable anyway. Any storm tidal surge can more than rise water 2 feet.

    At one time, New York was supposedly 200 feet other water. It also has been a tropical jungle and a frozen wasteland. Egypt changed from tropical to desert long before the industrial revolution - and that change happened over a very short geological time frame. There are numerous other examples of very rapid climate change unrelated to anything humans are doing. The great plague in the West is attributed to being so deadly because a mini-ice age drove people indoors and more exposed to rats - plus drove the rats indoor more than usual.

    "The climate is changing" is a truism. It always has been. Always will be.
     

Share This Page