The greens party is falling apart...YAY

Not really, else they woldnt have been continually reelected.

A vote for the greens is a vote against Australia. To make the mistake, of not voting the greens as the LEAST preferred of all candidates, is the vote that these parasites live off. The greens live off preferential votes, the scraps of our electoral system.[/QUOTE]
Well I voted for the Greens, and I did it to encourage progress in this country. Seems all you have here is mindless rhetorical opinion and articles articulating essentially the same thing.

 

Well I voted for the Greens, and I did it to encourage progress in this country. Seems all you have here is mindless rhetorical opinion and articles articulating essentially the same thing.[/QUOTE]

Well said, mindless rhetorical opinion is all they have.

They seem to hate anyone who unsettles their "Status Quo", progress, vision and humanitarianism are unknown to them.

 

When it comes to seriously ugly the winner by miles is Bronny, she would stampede the lawn mowers down at the hardware store. God knows how the pollies are going to cope with that corpse looking down at them.

 

Well I voted for the Greens, and I did it to encourage progress in this country. Seems all you have here is mindless rhetorical opinion and articles articulating essentially the same thing.[/QUOTE]

Besides helping to stop the Franklin dam being built in 1982, can you please give one credible example where the Greens party have help all Australians through another major significant policy that can justify their political candidates leaching off the Australian tax payers for 31 years, since their last political victory?

 

Well I voted for the Greens, and I did it to encourage progress in this country. Seems all you have here is mindless rhetorical opinion and articles articulating essentially the same thing.[/QUOTE]



The greens achievements in 31 years bludging off the Australian tax payer. The evidence speaks for itself.

http://greensmps.org.au/content/new...achievements-and-activities-relevant-tasmania

 

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nat...to-cathy-mcgowan/story-fn9qr68y-1226721804748

Okey Doke?

 

Big Jooles makes Brontosaurus Bronny look like a 15 out of 10.

 

Well said, mindless rhetorical opinion is all they have.

They seem to hate anyone who unsettles their "Status Quo", progress, vision and humanitarianism are unknown to them.[/QUOTE]

There must be a dictionary out there somewhere, that has the descriptions for "progress" and "regress" mixed up.

 

There must be a dictionary out there somewhere, that has the descriptions for "progress" and "regress" mixed up.[/QUOTE]

Oh yes there is, its published by the LNP along with that. other publication of theirs which says nothing called "Our Plan"

- - - Updated - - -

There must be a dictionary out there somewhere, that has the descriptions for "progress" and "regress" mixed up.[/QUOTE]

Oh yes there is, its published by the LNP along with that. other publication of theirs which says nothing called "Our Plan"

 

Are you arguing she isn't the dumbest woman in politics because her stupid ass has been kicked out of government?

 

There is an old saying: idiots can entertain stupid/simple people; I guess that's what Hanson-Young is doing.

 

LMBO. Are you saying that she`s in politics, or not? Make up your mind.
Furthermore, no one could be dumber than Sarah Hansen - Cow. That woman is dumber than a box of rocks.

- - - Updated - - -

Sarah isn`t an idiot, she`d need to study long and hard to qualify.

 

Yeah well there's another old saying, opinions are like (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s - everyone's got one. And that's what I'm reading here - just another guy's opinion

 

Just because she isn't in government doesn't mean she's not part of Australian politics. As I said, she the biggest dipper out.

Sorry Mirabella takes the cake, and clearly the title of 'cow' as well - have you seen that woman? If she were wearing a yellow raincoat you'd mistake her for a taxi

 

Oh yes there is, its published by the LNP along with that. other publication of theirs which says nothing called "Our Plan"

- - - Updated - - -



There must be a dictionary out there somewhere, that has the descriptions for "progress" and "regress" mixed up.[/QUOTE]

Oh yes there is, its published by the LNP along with that. other publication of theirs which says nothing called "Our Plan"[/QUOTE]

You`ve "progressed" all the way to second prize, out of two.

 

The writing is on the wall. The future is libertarian ideology as statism yields to common sense and demand to respect the Constitution.

 

Some people (rapidly diminishing in number), actually voted for the greens.
<<< MODERATOR EDIT: OFF TOPIC REPLY TO DELETED POST >>>

 

LOL A swing of 3% is "rapidly diminishing"? Hilarious. Yeah well, lets just wait another 3 years and see, eh?

 

Actually it is when your 3% represents near a 25% of your support base... Aren't statistics fun

 

...?... Was that what his source said?

 

Don't know, I did not even look at his source. That is the simple fact a drop from 11% support by 3% is near 25% drop in support... Again, aren&#8217;t statistics fun?

 

Particularly when we take into account that voter dissatisfaction with the ALP trends toward the greens. When the facts become too undeniable, there`s always the mummy button.

 

I didn`t provide a source, not for common knowledge such as this.

 

Lol the question wasnt directed at you. I'd never expect you to provide a source lol
I see by support base he meant 'general electorate'. I thought he meant of their major supporters. Tasmania might have been what he was referring to but i couldnt see how it was 25%. I don't see how a swing of 3% generally is crushing. Like I said earlier on the next election will decide, and I'll bet the greens will be fine.

 

That doesn't large within the general picture however. The greens votes didn't go to labor or the libs, they went to other independents, which isn't surprising.