Race mixing is not healthy ,for any race.It usurps the strain...like mixing a good hunting dog with a good watch dog,yeilds a dog that can't hunt are can't watch!....Have you noticed that Blacks who have 99% black blood seem to accomplish more that mixed breeds?The inherent traits are in the natural order of the bloodline.Mixed races usually end up in a society which neither race is accepted...
No... but I do seem to find lots of evidence for racists and bigots having lower than average IQs as studies suggest. That said anecdotal evidence isn't proof of theory.
Population mixing is natural. Plus there are barely any Afro-Americans that are of 99% African ancestry.
I saw this today on Drudge....about something Farrakhan said: Interesting that Farrakhan can say this with impunity, but not the OP. I would remind Farrakhan that White people crafted and passed the Civil Rights act; that a White man, Lincoln - and a Republican gave the emancipation proclamation. So, he's wrong that Whites saw Blacks suffering and did nothing. Listen up, Mr. Farrakhan. You don't like Mr. Obama, but race baiting is something you both have in common. SHAME on you BOTH. I have no idea if the OP is right in his contention, and frankly I've never thought about it. I will say this: I've lost hope that racism will EVER fade because ALL races will have racist thoughts and I don't believe that will ever change.
Yes,and that is why Africa has the biggest economy on the planet. Lolz. Do you read this stuff in comic books?
From a health standpoint, mutts are way, way better off than pure breeds. Pure breeds tend to have pretty common genetic issues due to inbreeding--this drops way off after a generation or two of cross-breeding. In general, this principle is called hybrid vigor. Those who think that "races" ought to remain "pure" are ignoring genetics. I would also point out that it would be severely unethical to propose breeding human beings for specific commercial purposes like we do domesticated animals. That is not supported by the evidence, actually. Though to be honest there is essentially no one in the US who does not have a substantially "mixed" ethnic background, statistically speaking. Actually such societies usually end up not giving a (*)(*)(*)(*) about it. If miscegenation is ubiquitous, no one cares about it. It's racially divided societies that have racial tensions of that sort.
Which could well be caused by the inbreeding their ideology promotes. After all, if the goal is to reduce some ideal strain of human being, then obviously one ought to keep it in the family.
It really is. The ethical vacancy involved is rather staggering. It essentially presupposes that human beings have no purpose other than what their masters design them for.
Imagine how far that ne'er do well Obama would of went if he hadn't had the hinderance of being of mixed race. He might of made something of himself, like IDK president of the galaxy, and not only been the measly president of the USA.
Indeed, why hasn't Obama single-handedly invented faster-than-light space travel? He can't be considered a successful president since he hasn't done that.
With the replies I have received,my quote stands...mixed races are less apt to become mensa card holders...Mixed animals and humans are all the same"mutts"..less brain power. The "pecking" order starts in Asia,and ends up in Africa or Aboriginese nations...Do a geneology search,and find out where you came from.....brain theft is rampant when you mix black and white! When you mix a black with Ice Cream,you still have Black...
Oh stop it with the snarky turd slinging. Obama is as lying and America-harming as they get. And it doesn't come from his mixed parentage; it comes from his Marxist background and that gigantic chip on his shoulder that's been cultivated via his grooming by the hatred of Black Liberation Theology. Just because he's president doesn't mean he's altruistic or a wise leader. He does NOT possess either of those qualities.
Especially true for bigots. You should trace your lineage, you might be surprised to find where you came from. http://dnaancestryproject.com/
Your snarky post is noted. Being flippant with hyper-exaggerations of what is expected of the POTUS' job performance does nothing to debate the truth. Obama can't be considered a successful president when his policies and actions have not only NOT fostered a recovery, but deepened it and our debt. For example, he authorized quantitative easing one in the amount of 1.7 trillion. QE2 was 900 billion. That's a total of 2.6 trillion in fiat money and a reason we're seeing inflation. That alone screams he is NOT doing a good job. .
REAL presidents are supposed to get in the cockpit of fighter jets and shoot down alien spaceships. Personally. Obama hasn't done that, so he's obviously a failure. Hell, he hasn't even wrestled a bear. Obama's not a dictator. He can't wave a magic wand and get the economy working again. I mean, would you really want to give him the kind of power that would let him personally fix the economy? That would be a radical expansion of the scope of government. It's really the private sector's responsibility to make sure the private sector recovers. Well, things probably would have been worse off without the easing. The economy was facing a severe credit problem--the easing helped with that. But it didn't really do anything to address the basic demand deficiencies. Nothing except employment would solve that, and that requires either a private sector hiring spree or direct employment by the government. Since congress won't authorize the funds to go hire one or two million new workers, that basically means the president has used up his ammunition, so to speak. There's really nothing for him--or any president--to do that he hasn't already done. It's not really the president's job to solve all of your problems. That's way beyond the normal scope of government. I don't think you'd want him to have the power where he could do so, so it seems a little unreasonable to expect him to do so.
Correction; they are just as likely to be MENSA members as anyone else. They are also less likely to have congenital genetic defects--albeit not by much. Humans aren't that genetically diverse. Genetics works the other way--hybrids are usually healthier, not weaker. Not that this applies to humans very well, since humans are all basically the same with some unimportant differences in facial structure, skin tone, and hair coloration. Certainly far less diverse than dogs or cattle or chickens. Or horses. Or any domesticated animal, to be honest. Absolute nonsense. Africa, ultimately. Racist garbage.
Has anyone isolated the 'intelligence' gene yet? Didn't think so. The truth is that anyone of any skin color can qualify as an idiot or an intellect and those who think skin color is a mark of superior intellect may just be good candidates for the 'idiot' category IMO. What I find interesting is the racists seem to have blinders on when it comes to their chosen segment of humanity. This goes for the Jessie Jacksons/Al Sharptons of the world as well as the 'skinhead' racists. Look if you racists want to 'preserve' your 'race' then just start poking women of your own 'race' (however you define it), shut-up and leave the rest of US alone. We don't see the world in terms of skin-color because....We aren't IDIOTS. Like you....
Snarky perhaps, and I would even suggest sarcastic and over the top, but I was not "slinging turds". I guess you must be trying to be clever with my name? Can't you separate your partisan hyper paranoid derangement toward Mr Obama and tip your cap at the accomplishment it takes to become president of this nation? My comment was not anything about his performance it was about how far he's come despite his (perceived by the OP, hinderance of) being mixed race.
