The Real Problem--Women in Leadership

Not that simple...we have to level the playing field

 

Yep, women probably would have let the Jews in...compassion is a no no to you...just the reason we need more women

 

I don't think she chuckles. Note how she laughs:

 

You don’t know women....women do not have the need to show how macho they are....but try messing with their kids, they’ll destroy you..same with leaders, they will do anything to keep they’re children safe.

 

It’s not about wiring as much as socialization. We encourage boys to play with killing toys and girls with nurturing ones

 

Bitch for women is the same as the n word for blacks. Just shows racism is acknowledged, sexism isn’t

 

Obviously true......when violence is needed........do you want a non-violent person?

LOL! Think about it.

 

Obviously........no matter who beats Trump there will be panty-twisting.

 

You're not paying attention.

It's been stated many times in the thread that there are exceptions.

 

You're not paying attention.

It's been stated many times in the thread that there are exceptions.

I've seen Angela Merkel nurturing aliens to the detriment of HER country.

Too early to tell with Ernst or Blackburn.

 

And there are plenty of men who will piss their pants, if threatened. Your generalizations are laughable.

 

I never said the judgement of men is great. I made a very factual comment about women in leadership.

Try to stick to what I said, not what you would like to talk about.........or start your own thread.

 

The question is not letting people in........Think!

The question is how many to let in and how qualified they are and how many of the trespassers should be kicked out.

Get it now?

If you are driven only by a nurturing and compassionate nature you will let far too many in and destroy America.

Now do you get it?

 

The same "exceptions" are found among male congressmen. I expect you would name some Democrats.

 

Yes, the socialization is part of the wiring.

Nature AND nurture create the beast that we need for war.

 

If the judgement of men is not great, then what is the point of your OP?

 

Nobody used bitch for women.........I used bitch for Hillary.

That's correct identification, not sexism.

 

No, your inability to comprehend the word "exceptions" is laughable.

 

You are talking about liberal women. Not someone like Thatcher, or Haley. Or me for that matter...though I'm a long shot. The problem is liberalism...not women.

 

Through racism and segregation.

That's not levelling the playing field, it's perpetuating the horrors of the past for a PG-13 audience.

 

This world needs men and women. I don't believe men's judgement is any better than a woman's. If it were we'd be living in a beautiful utopia right now.

 

You obviously have never seen a mother protecting her children. In fact, I would wager that you don't know that many women, flesh and blood at least.

 

The point has been explained many times.

Women are more compassionate and nurturing and far less violent than men........therefore, in a crisis when violence is needed--women are less capable of making the tough decisions and may give the enemy an advantage.

Patton may be a jackass, but in a war you need him rather than Betty White.

 

I'd wager you haven't read and understood the thread.

 

It's not. Nobody has said that it is. What HAS been said is this:

Women are more compassionate and nurturing and far less violent than men........therefore, in a crisis when violence is needed--women are less capable of making the tough decisions and may give the enemy an advantage.

Patton may be a jackass, but in a war you need him rather than Betty White.