The right to sue a law before breaking it?

It's Hippocratic oath, and that is an oath doctors take.

 

Dude, first off schools make no laws - state and federal representatives do. Second, no you can't just challenge a law and then break it....

Of course you can challenge a law tho, for example it used to be illegal in Illinois to film cops, then cops started arresting people for filming them and the law was challenged and overturned....

 

Where within this thread is anyone, especially myself, speaking about anything medical, much less doctors. I would suggest you invest in a dictionary or at least use one on line. Start with hypocritical, the perfect definition of a lawyer.

 

Take your own advice sweetheart.
law·yer
ˈloiər/
noun
1.
a person who practices or studies law; an attorney or a counselor.

 

I'm in no manner a sweetheart, much less yours.

Also it is customary when using the work of another to give them credit via a reference. As to "lawyer", this definition would probably be more to your style.

Personally I prefer the "assmonkey" and there was no doubt in my mind as to the second part of the quote. Imagine all those lawyers drafting a document to enslave a new country that had just fought to be free. I stand with the anti-federalist and no doubt you would have enjoyed Hamilton.

 

The safest thing to do is to not engage in sex period, unless you are married. That way the school cannot charge you with anything; never allow yourself to place yourself in a position to be accused of anything regarding sex. It's not worth it.

 

But a hypocrite, perhaps.

What? Oh this is just you're mental masturbatory obsession with one profession. Now I understand why everything you say makes no sense. You are blinded by anger.

 

The school rules apply to married students too. Being in a relationship does not mean consent was given. It should say that being in a relationship does not mean consent can't be revoked.

 

In that case, it would be best not to engage in any type of sex while at school and wait until the semester break occurs. I believe it's always better to err on the side of caution.

 

First, why would anyone want to be married? Second, why would one want to curtail something because of fear, especially sex?

 

That would be your opinion and from what experience here carries little validity.

There are many delusional beings on this forum which will never in their lifetime understand the realities of life, much like your admission. But to attempt to try and make some determination of the state of another when it seems you have not accomplished that within yourself is absurd. It seems pretty obvious just within this thread that comprehension of what is being discussed is not a strong suit with you.

 

Sometimes people do fall in love and want to seal it with a marriage.

It's an individual decision; you roll the dice and in this particular case, risk having a complaint filed against you by the other party. Ask yourself, is what you stand to gain worth what you could lose?

 

I think my compression is pretty good. You hate lawyers for some reason. As to why I don't care.

 

What does one have to do with the other?

All of life is an individual decision, the real question is whether one chooses to live or hide in fear while life passes them by. As I choose to live my life to the fullest, I care not about fear. Someone want to sue, then let's go, it could be an experience they would wish they never started. I will not lay down and roll over.

- - - Updated - - -

Maybe so but you do seem to lack in comprehension.

 

Lack comprehension of blind hatred? Yeah it's difficult for me to understand.

 

Hate, such a strong word that destroys the soul. Me, I hate nothing including lawyers, I just have no respect for them, about the same level as law enforcement. Why, that would definitely be beyond your "compression".

 

No it's actually not that difficult to comprehend. You don't like puerile having authority. It isn't that uncommon of a human feeling.

 

Blind hatred, is that based on your compression? Sure doesn't seem to have anything to do with comprehension. Trying to apply your emotional ups and downs and internal feeling to another seems to be in the same category as your comprehension. Perhaps it falls in that category of compression you expressed.

 

I had to talk to you long enough to comprehend, now I do. You don't like authority.

Funny how you avoided responding to that post. So I must be spot on.

 

Well it would seem that is not the case as applied to your responses. It would seem comprehension is not one of your strong suits.

Uncommon, I think that only the infirm would actually even consider condoning the behaves in a puerile manner should be allow on their own much less have any position of authority.

As to authority in general, every person has all the authority that can muster to handle their own affairs. To deem another as an authority is to bow as a slave to the master. No man is my master nor I his.

Perhaps you enjoy being a slave, I insist on freedom. Their are no authorities in my world, only crooks and equals, which are you?

 

Actually you still don't comprehend at all. It seems that all you have accomplished is to put everything into neat little categories of your own making. Ill-conceived categories I might add.

It is impossible to like or dislike that which does not exist. Authority exists only in the world of master and slaves. As I am neither, it does not exist internally. It is but a joke externally. I love to watch all the little people dance to the tune of those they somehow believe in their mind as their masters. They whine, they cry but they dance.

When one learns to stand on their own two feet, it all goes away. The only way I will ever bow is as wasted remains at their feet but my spirit will remain free and unbroken.

As your comprehension seems to be lacking, I don't expect you to understand any of this much less believe any of it. But then this is for me and those that stand tall.

 

That was a typo, and I apologize.

You don't like people having authority. It isn't that uncommon of a human feeling.

 

Actually I do.

So there is slaves and masters or complete anarchy? I don't agree.

What goes away?

Me too. I have bowed to authority in the past and learned to stand alone without it.

I very much understand it. I agree with most of it.

I just don't see advocacy as a bad thing.

 

where do you think rights come from?

 

You still haven't a clue, there is no one that has any authority except at the point of a gun. That isn't authority, that is coercion. I don't like or dislike, I ignore unless they violate my rights and then I make them pay. By the way, lawyers are the most fun, they are but buffoons indoctrinated in some misguided concept of power and authority. I love getting them in the court room and watching them seethe as they are humiliated in public but then most are sociopaths/psychopaths suffering from moral relativism and carry no shame.

As you keep insisting, like equates to love and dislike equates to hate, but what you fail to comprehend is both are but emotions, evolving from the Limbic system (Mammalian Brain) which facilitates human emotion. Psychopaths have malfunction in this part of the brain, not able to experience full range of human emotions. When a human is said to be right brain dominant, the Limbic system will take over executive function of the brain, and the person will become ruled by their own emotions and develop a personality based in submissiveness and naiveté.

From a psychological point of view, the Neocortex of the brain has two hemispheres. The left brain hemisphere largely facilitates logical and scientific thought, while the right brain hemisphere largely facilitates creativity and compassion. When both hemispheres are in balance, the Neocortex acts in it's proper role as the executive command center of the human brain, and true intelligence (intellect and creativity) is born.