From where is the rise of mental illness and other physical, emotional, psychological shortcomings coming from within Asia? In the 1950's and 1960's Asia had a very low statistic on mental illness, physical illness, emotional shortcomings and psychological illness. How and where are today's illnesses within Asia coming from? The rise of such illnesses began in the late 80s when obesity began to be found within Asia. Before this time, obesity was not a factor in Asia. After the cases of obesity began to appear, other 'illnesses' began to appear. Down's Syndrome, Depression, Suicide, Isolation and others. Obesity started out as isolated cases but then grew to be acceptable and needing to be received with 'compassion' and 'care'. And this led to the idea that all other 'shortcomings' needed to be received in the same way; with 'compassion' and care. Now Asia faces this problem with their decisions on how to receive their own LGBT children. Although Japan was a bit more 'modern' than the rest of the other Asian Countries, Japan was one of the first Asian Countries where 'suicide' for extremely difficult studying, became the 'norm'. Other Asian countries followed suit. Japan also was one of the first leaders, within Asia, for youth recreational activities; such as video game playing, staying at home, isolating self away from parents and society, living alone, youths providing for their own life and lifestyle, youths being as adults, etc... And now other Asian Countries are also following in the same footsteps. Youths are being as 'adults' without yet being a true adult, youths remaining at home, youths trying to live apart from parents and their ways, youths providing for their own well being and independent lifestyles. etc.... Before all of this, Asia was known for 'Grandchildren' preparations. Asia was known for their lifestyle and ways of them living so that their 'Grandchildren' would grow up within a life and culture which was good and healthy as the new Asians. Job security, Ethical behavior, Long term goals, owning/receiving family Homes and raising family, keeping the language alive and active, honoring employers, being respectful, being respectable, being an upright member in Society, not bringing shame into the home or last name.... It was not uncommon for newlywed couples to live in the same home with their grandparents and parents. Coming home to a family home, with both selves, parents and grandparents, were common and common practice which not many spoke out against. Families eating together would mean; newlyweds, parents, and grandparents all eating together at the table and grandparents having their own 'room' within the home as well as the parents and newlyweds. The living room, the kitchen were common areas for the family while the den was for the parents. Grandparents stayed home while their children and grandchildren went off to work to clean and to keep the home, parents were the job holders and their children, the newlyweds, were to learn to live within their own family line, to speak about their family, to live as family. Only when the newlyweds had secure jobs did they move into their own home to raise their own family and to keep the tradition of being in the same home with their own grandchildren alive. But what caused the rise of the 'anti' to these? I believe television had a big part in the forming of 'worldly' illnesses to appear within Asia. And now there is both television and technology from which Asia as well as every other part of the Globe receives images and ideas and jokes and non-seriousness from. Worldly humor, worldly ideas, worldly associations, but in their own Language. And remember that Asia is; Far East, Middle East, Near East. All these are considered part of the Orient.
So please, Asia... Do not seek to pomp yourselves up by thinking or believing that you are not Asians. The pomp coming from you are as car horns being tooted without need.
Who is the girl that thinks of herself as both Korean and Italian with pomp in both Korea and Italy without having shame for thinking of herself that way? Does she think she owns every Country? She might have the monies to be able to do what she does but monies, such as this, needs to get burnt. It is absolutely disgusting....
And so the saga continues. This is how it goes... You come into 'our' Country and act the way you do, we will go into 'your' Country and act the way we want. And out of all the U.S States, which has these sentiments large enough to actually carry out? I will say this again. The State of Hawai'i feels as if they were 'illegally' made into a U.S State and have very deep resentments and negativity towards this even to this day. Very deep, very resentful, very hated. To continue to disregard their sentiments is as telling them to do what they need to do to get their desires.... The lack of proper handling to this situation, within The U.S, has caused both Italy and Korea, so far, to have received negative subsidiaries within their own Countries. Not to mention the others if there are. I only came across these two but I'm sure there are others. And please do not let 'The U.S' be the excuse to say that what they are doing is fine and pleasing and nice and lovely to every other person in the World. Although The U.S is resented against by Hawai'i, if you take a 3rd perspective point of view, it could be seen that The U.S is using Hawai'i to get into every other Country and Nation with anti Traditional values and ways while Hawai'i is trying to make it's voice heard to the entire World. Although day after day, Hawai'i continues to ask, to plead, to demand, everyone seems to think as if they are 'joking'. Everyone seems to treat Hawai'i, with their requests and pains, as if they are only 'joking'. Pain is real. And nothing is being done to remedy this which causes 'pain' to be indoctrinated into other Countries through painful ways.
It is not the responsibility of U.S residents and citizens to take care of this matter. The people of Hawai'i have already made their voice and concerns heard, both verbal and written. The residents and citizens can do nothing since this is a Legal Governmental issue. The Government of Hawai'i has already brought this concern to the Federal Government. And although certain 'illegal' points were addressed and recognized, many Hawaiian persons and Government officials are still requesting for further rightful Judicial actions. So it is now up to the Federal Government to seek to remedy, to ask how they might be of assistance, so that The U.S will and can get back on track in a non corrupt, non illegal, kind of way. In my own personal opinion, going along with the Words which (J)esus Christ spoke: Matthew 7:18 "A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit." A 'corrupt' tree will NOT bring forth good fruit. PERIOD. If The U.S has a 'corrupt' tree within it, The U.S will NOT be able to bring forth good fruit. To overlook 'illegality' outcries on large scales are as a CORRUPT tree(s).
On Jan. 17, 1893, Hawaii's monarchy was overthrown when a group of businessmen and sugar planters forced Queen Liliuokalani to abdicate. The coup led to the dissolving of the Kingdom of Hawaii two years later, its annexation as a U.S. territory and eventual admission as the 50th state in the union. https://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/...chy-overthrown-by-america-backed-businessmen/ The Committee of Safety established a provisional government headed by Mr. Dole. U.S. President Grover Cleveland opposed the provisional government and called for the queen to be restored to power, but the Committee of Safety established the Republic of Hawaii and refused to cede power.
Cleveland was the leader of the pro-business Bourbon Democrats who opposed high tariffs, Free Silver, inflation, imperialism, and subsidies to business, farmers, or veterans on libertarian philosophical grounds. His crusade for political reform and fiscal conservatism made him an icon for American conservatives of the era.[2] Cleveland won praise for his honesty, self-reliance, integrity, and commitment to the principles of classical liberalism.[3] He fought political corruption, patronage, and bossism. As a reformer, Cleveland had such prestige that the like-minded wing of the Republican Party, called "Mugwumps", largely bolted the GOP presidential ticket and swung to his support in the 1884 election. As his second administration began, disaster hit the nation when the Panic of 1893 produced a severe national depression, which Cleveland was unable to reverse. It ruined his Democratic Party, opening the way for a Republican landslide in 1894 and for the agrarian and silverite seizure of the Democratic Party in 1896. The result was a political realignment that ended the Third Party System and launched the Fourth Party System and the Progressive Era. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover_Cleveland
08/21/1959 - Hawaii Becomes 50th State. On this day in 1959, the modern United States receives its crowning star when President Dwight D. Eisenhower signs a proclamation admitting Hawaii into the Union as the 50th state http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/hawaii-becomes-50th-state Crowning: representing a level of surpassing achievement, attainment, etc.; supreme: crowningaccomplishment. forming or providing a crown, top, or summit: a crowning star on a Christmas tree. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/crowning
08/21/1959 - Hawaii Becomes 50th State. On this day in 1959, the modern United States receives its crowning star when President Dwight D. Eisenhower signs a proclamation admitting Hawaii into the Union as the 50th state http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/hawaii-becomes-50th-state The modern United States received its crowning star when President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a proclamation admitting Hawaii into the Union as the 50th state. The president also issued an order for an American flag featuring 50 stars arranged in staggered rows: five six-star rows and four five-star rows. https://www.history.co.uk/this-day-in-history/21-august/hawaii-becomes-the-50th-state Why do both sources of history.com in the U.S and in the U.K call the 50th star, 'Crowning Star'?
And herein is another question: When the majority of persons say a certain thing is 'incorrect', although it is 'correct', what should be done? Example: America has 50 (in number) States. Correct? or Incorrect? Countries in America (35 in number) http://www.sport-histoire.fr/en/Geography/America.php List of countries in the Americas - by population (55 in number) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_in_the_Americas_by_population What does The United States of America mean? It means, The United States, of/within, America. Brazil could be called or call itself, Brazil of America. Mexico could be called or call itself, Mexico of America. Columbia could be called or call itself, Columbia of America. Argentina could be called or call itself, Argentina of America. etc, etc.... Total Human Population of the 55 America(s) Countries combined? 982,093,000 Total Human Population of The United States? 321,234,000 Human population percent of The United States to Total America(s)? 32.71% 1 out of every 3 human(s) in America(s) live in The United States. 2 out of every 3 human(s) in America(s) live in other America(s) Countries. Percent of human(s) in America(s) not living in The United States? 67.29 % What percent is total America(s) human population, at 982,093,000, to world human population, at 7.6 billion? approximately : >, 12.92 % approximately to : greater than, 12.92 %
These are numbers. Then there are human pains within these numbers. What is the human population of The Untied States? 321,234,000 What is the human population of Hawai'i? 1,428,000 What is the percentage of human population of Hawai'i to The United States? approximately : >, 0.44% What percentage of U.S has a 'corrupt' tree growing on it? Can a small thing cause the whole barrel to go bad?
We’ve all heard the saying "one bad apple spoils the whole bunch," and have probably seen instances where it does apply to people, but does it actually happen with fruit? Yes. http://mentalfloss.com/article/31666/does-one-bad-apple-really-spoil-whole-bunch What do wise, diligent farmers do when they see a 'bad apple' among the bunch? What occurs to the Nation when and if it is Governed by a 'lazy' or a 'lazy' persons?
............................................. ......... ......................................... ..........................
Okay... Let's go over certain things. #1: Is it the duty of persons to be able to get along with one another? #2: Is it the duty of Government to correct the wrongs? #3: Is it possible for a 'corrupt' tree to bring forth 'good' fruit? #4: Is it the duty of persons to deal with the 'corrupt' tree(s)? #5: Is it the duty of Government to deal with the 'corrupt' tree(s)? #6: Is the future of the Land, to either bear 'good' fruit or 'bad' fruit, important? #7: Does The United States of America 'care' IF their 'land' does not bear 'good' fruit?
Is 'corruption' a human invention? Ecclesiastes 7:29 "Lo, this only have I found, that God hath made man upright; but they have sought out many inventions." Why not, 'when in doubt', ask The Lord for assistance?
Matthew 7:18 "A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit." FACT or Personal Opinion? FACT or Personal Interpretation? The only way a 'corrupt' tree can remain 'corrupt' is by the agreeing that the tree is 'corrupt'; in the case of 'illegality'. As for individual 'corrupt' tree(s), as for the individual's own 'corrupt' tree(s), the only way to have it turned into a good fruit bearing tree is to have the vinedresser tend to it, to prune it, to sometimes uproot and fertilize and to water with God providing the growth. Luke 13:6-9 "He spake also this parable; A certain man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard; and he came and sought fruit thereon, and found none. 7Then said he unto the dresser of his vineyard, Behold, these three years I come seeking fruit on this fig tree, and find none: cut it down; why cumbereth it the ground? 8And he answering said unto him, Lord, let it alone this year also, till I shall dig about it, and dung it: 9And if it bear fruit, well: and if not, then after that thou shalt cut it down." Matthew 25:14-30 "For the kingdom of heaven is as a man travelling into a far country, who called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods. 15And unto one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one; to every man according to his several ability; and straightway took his journey. 16Then he that had received the five talents went and traded with the same, and made them other five talents. 17And likewise he that had received two, he also gained other two. 18But he that had received one went and digged in the earth, and hid his lord's money. 19After a long time the lord of those servants cometh, and reckoneth with them. 20And so he that had received five talents came and brought other five talents, saying, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me five talents: behold, I have gained beside them five talents more. 21His lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord. 22He also that had received two talents came and said, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me two talents: behold, I have gained two other talents beside them. 23His lord said unto him, Well done, good and faithful servant; thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord. 24Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed: 25And I was afraid, and went and hid thy talent in the earth: lo, there thou hast that is thine. 26His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed: 27Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury. 28Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents. 29For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath. 30And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." Luke 13:8-9 " 8And he answering said unto him, Lord, let it alone this year also, till I shall dig about it, and dung it: 9And if it bear fruit, well: and if not, then after that thou shalt cut it down." Matthew 25:26-30 "His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed: 27Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury. 28Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents. 29For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath. 30And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth."
Since the one appointed as vinedresser did not do his/her job, what will The Son of Man do? The Son of Man shall have His Angels do what the vinedresser was to have done Matthew 13:36-43 "Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came unto him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field. 37He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man; 38The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; 39The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. 40As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world. 41The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. 43Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear." But many said, this is for the end of the world. The kingdom of this Earth does not belong unto Him. John 18:36 "Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence." Matthew 13:41-43 "The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. 43Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear."
Matthew 7:18 "A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit." FACT or Personal Opinion? FACT or Personal Interpretation? The only way a 'corrupt' tree can remain 'corrupt' is by the agreeing that the tree is 'corrupt'; in the case of 'illegality'. As for individual 'corrupt' tree(s), as for the individual's own 'corrupt' tree(s), the only way to have it turned into a good fruit bearing tree is to have the vinedresser tend to it, to prune it, to sometimes uproot and fertilize and to water with God providing the growth. Luke 13:6-9 "He spake also this parable; A certain man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard; and he came and sought fruit thereon, and found none. 7Then said he unto the dresser of his vineyard, Behold, these three years I come seeking fruit on this fig tree, and find none: cut it down; why cumbereth it the ground? 8And he answering said unto him, Lord, let it alone this year also, till I shall dig about it, and dung it: 9And if it bear fruit, well: and if not, then after that thou shalt cut it down." Why could the vinedresser NOT 'cut down the corrupt tree' by himself or with his fellow workers? John 3:19-21 "And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God." Matthew 15:8 "This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me." Isaiah 29:13 "Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men:"
Don't forget... we are NOT the only 'eyes' in the World.... Proverbs 24:24 "He that saith unto the wicked, Thou art righteous; him shall the people curse, nations shall abhor him:" 'him', whether singularly or as a multitude.
Luke 13:6-9 "He spake also this parable; A certain man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard; and he came and sought fruit thereon, and found none. 7Then said he unto the dresser of his vineyard, Behold, these three years I come seeking fruit on this fig tree, and find none: cut it down; why cumbereth it the ground? 8And he answering said unto him, Lord, let it alone this year also, till I shall dig about it, and dung it: 9And if it bear fruit, well: and if not, then after that thou shalt cut it down." Why could the vinedresser NOT 'cut down the corrupt tree' by himself or with his fellow workers? Had the 'certain man' not pointed out the 'corrupt tree', what might or could have happened to the entire vineyard? Matthew 13:38 "The field is the world;..." Could the uprooting or cutting down of only 1 corrupt tree have saved the entire field due to God's Grace and Favor for doing as He instructed? Matthew 15:8 "This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me." Isaiah 29:13 "Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men:" John 3:19-21 "And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God." Don't forget that other lives are also depending on God. Don't forget... we are NOT the only 'eyes' in the World.... Proverbs 24:24 "He that saith unto the wicked, Thou art righteous; him shall the people curse, nations shall abhor him:"
And so, the question is not about why certain persons are unable to get along with other individuals. The question is, is 'legality' and 'Right' being asked for but being denied?
This end; however, the resulting of The Unified Kingdom of Hawai'i is not the end, though. There are other lives which are being overlooked to see the Palace picture. There are other lives and voices which are being quenched due to Wealth. Who are they? Do they matter? Is the Unified Kingdom of Hawai'i a part of their outcries? Remember that a Monarch has a King and a Royal Line. The Royal Line of The Unified Kingdom of Hawai'i did not arise from centuries before the very first King of the Unified Islands, King Kamehameha the First. In fact, King Kamehameha the First was not supposed to have become any 'ruler' of any Island but was entrusted with the keys of the religious house of the Island 'god', Ku, as his personal inheritance from his adopted 'father - Ruler' Ali'i of the Island of Hawai'i. It was with his own personal desires that he killed the rightful heir to the Throne of Ali'i of the Island of Hawai'i, the true, biological son of The Ali'i of the Island of Hawai'i to gain the title of Ali'i for himself. And it was ONLY after this, that he sought to claim the Ali'i rights and Authority of all the other Islands and all the other Ali'i's; hence, The Unified Islands, or Kingdom, strictly and only under himself as King and Ruler. Nonetheless, this has to do with the Hawai'ian people. The U.S is still The U.S before and after the Unification of the Islands. What The U.S will do, what The U.S is going to do is the main question here since these words are being typed in English and not in any other Language Script. Part of this posting is to deal with what The U.S will do to the outcries of voices demanding Just and Right to an 'illegal' overthrowing of Their Kingdom, which had its own Government and Government system. As long as the 'corrupt' planting of the tree, or 'illegal' planting of the tree remains standing or within the other trees, the possibility of it 'corrupting' the other trees remains more higher than lower. The 'illegal/corrupt' planting of the 'tree' does not absolve the planters, though. These can be seen as enemies of the 'good seeds/trees' in the World.
Matthew 13:36-39 "Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came unto him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field. 37He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man; 38The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; 39The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels." Ecclesiastes 7:29 "Lo, this only have I found, that God hath made man upright; but they have sought out many inventions." Luke 13:6-9 "He spake also this parable; A certain man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard; and he came and sought fruit thereon, and found none. 7Then said he unto the dresser of his vineyard, Behold, these three years I come seeking fruit on this fig tree, and find none: cut it down; why cumbereth it the ground? 8And he answering said unto him, Lord, let it alone this year also, till I shall dig about it, and dung it: 9And if it bear fruit, well: and if not, then after that thou shalt cut it down."
