The Secret Jewish History Of The Pussyhat

In my long and popular thread Jews are comparing Donald Trump to Hitler (which was later changed to Sarah Silverman as Hitler: Trump Comparisons 'Bum Me Out') I showed that jews have a leading role in the protests and smear campaign against president Trump:

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...s-hitler-trump-comparisons-bum-me-out.460427/

And in the following article from the jewish newspaper The Forward we find the umpteenth example of this:

http://forward.com/culture/365099/the-secret-jewish-history-of-the-pussyhat/

I think it's interesting that Jayna Zweiman uses the term tikkun olam when she talks about her subversive anti-Trump activism. For those of you who don't know, tikkun olam is the jewish religious concept that jews have a model society, and that it's their moral obligation to spread their values to other peoples as well:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tikkun_olam

Do you agree with this concept, folks? And is Jayna Zweiman doing us non-jews a favor by agitating against the president of her host country and knitting pink headwear that she calls "pussyhats"? As always, all opinions are welcome.

 

Oh cat ears...

 

What? This was the first time I've hear about it, and my mind immediately went to a dirty place.

 

She's an american and America is her country, not her host. Or do you think that jews aren't really american?

 

She may be American, but IMO she's engaging in a subversive activity if she's participating in an organized attempt to usurp the legally elected President.

That's what Soros triggered in the Ukraine, and look at it now.

Lawlessness and untruthfulness are still lawlessness and untruthfulness even if they are seen as being in a "good cause", and if it leads to violence, whether all participants intended it or not, it is still a conspiracy if it is the result of organized action.

With organized action, one never knows what the true objectives of the originators are, especially when the invisible hand of someone like Soros is involved. Soros had his bankroll betting on Hillary. Why was that? So more societies could become victims to his pillaging?

Is Soros now planning to pick the bones of the US instead, in revenge?

I said during the campaign we would pay the price to our rotten wealthy "leadership" if Trump won, and it began the day he took office.

 

Ah I see, so there can be no dissent. Dissent against a republican president is treason but against a democratic president it patriotism.

Please try to get ALL of the facts in line before cherry picking what the "other side" does. But then again, guys like the kochs and Adelsohn are on the "right side" of things, so they are to be defended by "I know you are but what am I" partisan puerile postering.

As for the "rotten wealthy Leadership" exactly how many billionaires are in trumps cabinet? Oh wait, they aren't rotten they are just wealthy, right?

 

Absolutely. The jewish organizers of this protest openly show their contempt for US democracy:

https://www.ft.com/content/7b34cd82-dfe2-11e6-8405-9e5580d6e5fb

When I started this thread my mind immediately went to the other feminists who also use the word p**** in their activism: the "music" group P**** Riot, which was also backed and/or created by jews:

The Secret History of P**** Riot

http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/08/23/the-secret-history-of-*****-riot/

The man who wrote this excellent article is the honest, principled and intelligent journalist Israel Shamir, a jew that I can respect.

So when leading jewish figures in the anti-Trump protests say

“We’ve elected an impossible president. We’re never going home. We’re staying together and we’re taking over.”

…you don't see anything wrong with it? You don't think that it's just a tad bit disturbing and anti-democratic?

 

Its da jooooooooooooooooooos secretly controlling the world.
Gotta luv the losers who have to blame somebody else for their own miserable condition. You jew haters are consistent if nothing else.

 

I remember when rabbit ears were too controversial for polite society. I don't see how today's feminine genitalia themed head coverings are any better.

 

"host country?

are you saying Jewish-Americans are not true Americans?

 

She may be American, but IMO she's engaging in a subversive activity if she's participating in an organized attempt to usurp the legally elected President.

That's what Soros triggered in the Ukraine, and look at it now.

Lawlessness and untruthfulness are still lawlessness and untruthfulness even if they are seen as being in a "good cause", and if it leads to violence, whether all participants intended it or not, it is still a conspiracy if it is the result of organized action.

With organized action, one never knows what the true objectives of the originators are, especially when the invisible hand of someone like Soros is involved. Soros had his bankroll betting on Hillary. Why was that? So more societies could become victims to his pillaging?

Is Soros now planning to pick the bones of the US instead, in revenge?

I said during the campaign we would pay the price to our rotten wealthy "leadership" if Trump won, and it began the day he took office.

 

so you oppose the 1st Amendment?

Freedom of Speech & Association is dead, under Trumpfuhrer?

 

I think it's remarkable that you're incapable of debating without resorting to insults and personal attacks. In any case, you never answered my question:

If the Tea Party guys had said that about Hussein Obama, would you have defended them?

 

So the argument from one side here is if you do not like policies of the President to keep your mouth shut unless the President is from a certain party.

Might as well amend the Constitution and get rid of that pesky 1st amendment or change it that only speech praising policies and agendas of a certain political party is allowed. Dissent against the other party is allowed.

Actually Arizona is attempting to get around the right to assemble. Allowing people to be arrested and have assets seized if just one person in a group of protesters commit a crime. The bill even allows authorities to predetermine if someone will commit a crime and start arresting people and seizing assets. So people who plan and attend protest will risk their assets and jail time even if they did not plan or support any crime that is committed during a protest.

 

as long as they arent plotting revolution or burning cars in the streets, i dont really care what kind of shitty hats they wear.

 

We also have laws against conspiracy to overthrow the government:

1. U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 115 › § 2385

114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

• US Code
• Notes

prev | next
Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 2, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 87–486, June 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 103; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385

 

Good post, Merwen. It's impossible to deny the subversive, anti-democratic nature of these jewish anti-Trump protests.

 

Its totally legal to call for the impeachment of Trump.

Its totally legal to call for Trump to be removed from office via the 25th Amendment.

 

That's not always what they are saying, though. Sometimes the implication is much more.


I especially like this portion of the anti-conspiracy law

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

Soros has almost a half trillion. If the US were able to acquire that or most of it as a fine it would solve our SS payment problem for years.

Watch out, George.

Quick! Someone mention this possible revenue source to Trump!

 

During the presidential race, the hysterical, anti-American jew Michael Cohen wanted to silence Trump, and even encouraged violence against him. And he did this in the well-known and "respectable" newspaper The Boston Globe:

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion...hird-debate/32oyCuhCjolz9ptFt3Ty0H/story.html

A major US presidential candidate shouldn't be allowed to speak to the American people. And he deserves a slap in the face.

Censorship, violence… is that how democracy is supposed to work? Really?

 

Well, we do have previous US President who do have Irish origins, so allow the Israeli one to express her being an American.

 

Sorry, but once you start going on about George Soros running the world, I relegate you to the Alex Jones category.

Protesting Trump is a patriotic act. First, simply because we enjoy free expression here and it's good to exercise that freedom.

And more importantly, because clearly Trump is a dangerous misogynist racist narcissist liar con-artist and pro-russian traitor. It is a patriotic imperative to oppose this orange Hitler as well as the misguided Republicans who would use his Presidency to push through their evil agenda of depriving people of healthcare, keeping wages down, enabling corporate hegemony, destroying the middle class, etc.

VOTE DEMOCRATIC!!! Meanwhile... PROTEST!!!

 

Debating the typical anti jew propaganda nonsense that you appear to promote?

As to your question. No it isnt' disturbing when somebody claims "their" group should take over. Especially inconsequential individuals of no real political power.
Unless of course you happen to be one of the bigoted clowns who believe in the global jewish conspiracy and the protocols.

 

OK; that pretty much puts you in the Soros camp.

 

Haha how quickly you forget Obama's NSA program that was exposed and our 1st amendment rights. But yea, whine about Trump.