There are numerous superstitions rooted in the belief that similar events happen in threes. Some superstitions are positive, some are negative like three on a match, or three famous people dying in close proximity. I want to add another three on the positive side. Senator Olympia Snowe is retiring. To make three work for conservatives they have to get rid if two more RINO. Senator Orrin Hatch is an ideal choice. He is in a tough fight in Utah. Incidentally, here’s one more bad mark against Mitt Romney: http://www.orrinhatch.com/_blog/blo...pport_Re-Election_Of_Senator_Hatch_In_New_Ad/ Dumping Senator Richard Lugar is the big one. Replacing him with a true conservative would be a godsend. Further comments follow the article. Please read the second paragraph if you read nothing else: World Government Lobby Frets Over Fate of Lugar Cliff Kincaid Monday, March 19, 2012 “He’s got to run against who he is.” This was the verdict on Republican Senator Richard Lugar from one of the activists attending a Citizens for Global Solutions (CGS) national conference in Washington, D.C. last week. The group used to be known as the World Federalist Association but dropped the name because of the taint associated with promoting world government. The incumbent Lugar, one of their favorites, is fighting for his political life in the Indiana Republican Senate primary against Richard Mourdock, Indiana’s State Treasurer, who has highlighted Lugar’s financial link to Democratic money bags George Soros. “Senator Lugar is one of the few Republicans ever supported by Soros,” Mourdock says. The World Federalist Association had openly stated that a “world federation,” a euphemism for world government, can be achieved by advancing “step by step toward global governance” through establishing new U.N.-associated entities such as the International Criminal Court and by passing measures like the Law of the Sea Treaty. One of its main priorities is “To provide the U.N. with sustained and independent sources of funding.” That is, global taxes. “Lugar can’t use that part of who he is,” said a left-wing activist, discussing the race as people waited for Obama Administration officials to brief the participants on “genocide prevention.” He said the world government lobby had met with Lugar’s personnel to offer their help, but were told that any public expression of support for the liberal Republican senator would backfire because of mounting Republican suspicions that Lugar is a RINO—Republican In Name Only. In this context, the release of the latest CGS Congressional Report Card cannot come as good news for the senator. The group gives Lugar a B minus, the highest for any Republican in the Senate except for liberal Susan Collins of Maine. By comparison, the other Republican senator from Indiana, conservative Dan Coats, got an F. The report card measures votes on global issues such as ratification of U.N. treaties, and funding for international institutions such as the U.N. and the International Monetary Fund. As Lugar’s true colors as a globalist begin to be covered by the national media, another embarrassment has emerged. A local elections board has ruled that Lugar can’t vote for himself in the primary, scheduled for May 8, because he doesn’t live in the state. Once known as then-Senator Barack Obama’s closest Republican friend in the Senate, he is now running as somebody opposed to the Obama agenda on issues such as the intervention in Libya. The big question is whether his extreme makeover as an anti-Obama conservative Republican will work. The major media have been content to let Lugar remake his image, but alternative media such as Red State and Tea Party groups have been working hard to get the facts out to the voting public. The result is that although Lugar had been leading Mourdock by 20 points, the latest poll has him up by only six. This is making big news on a national and local basis, with one paper proclaiming, “Polls indicate gap in Indiana’s Senate primary closing.” Lugar, a prominent backer of the U.N. Law of the Sea Treaty, even has financial ties to the world government lobby, having accepted campaign contributions from the Citizens for Global Solutions political action committee and giving an interview to the organization’s newsletter. One edition of its newsletter hailed Lugar as one of several “internationalist Senators” the group was working with. Another heralded Senators Obama and Lugar as “globally-minded leaders” supported by CGS. Lugar has been “a long-time advocate for internationalism,” it said. Although it admires Lugar and other liberal Republicans, the CGS works hard to defeat conservative Republicans. In 2006 it attacked Pennsylvania Republican Senator Rick Santorum, who was running for re-election. Drew J. Asson, who ran the CGS political action committee trying to defeat Santorum, was quoted as saying that President Bush was a “fascist” and that Israel was guilty of “aggression” and “murder” in its campaign against terrorists. Asson’s PAC gave $5,000 to Santorum’s successful opponent, Bob Casey, who promised a “new direction” in foreign and domestic policy. But shortly after an editorial in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review challenged Casey about the controversial donation from the group, Casey’s campaign returned the money. Obviously aware of the sensitivity caused by a financial link to a world government group, the Lugar campaign website makes no mention of it and instead insists the senator is a “national security leader.” It emphasizes Lugar’s work with former Democratic Senator Sam Nunn on the Nunn-Lugar bill to eliminate nuclear weapons in Russia. However, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) revealed that some of the funds were used to destroy obsolete weapons that Moscow was going to replace with high-tech arms and provide salaries for Russian scientists. The campaign website does not mention how Lugar had served as one of Obama’s mentors and had accompanied him on a 2005 trip to Russia, when Kremlin authorities briefly confiscated and reviewed Obama’s passport. The Lugar-Obama relationship, now in the closet because of Lugar’s need for an extreme makeover, was once out in the open. “Old-school realist Richard Lugar, the five-term Republican senator from Indiana, has embraced new-school realist and rising star Barack Obama, the junior Democratic senator from Illinois,” noted the Washington Monthly back in September 2006 under the title, “Hoosier Daddy.” It went on, “The relationship is admiring. ‘I very much feel like the novice and pupil,’ Obama has said of Lugar. And it’s warm. Lugar praises Obama’s ‘strong voice and creativity’ and calls him ‘my good friend.’ In short, the two agree on much and seem to genuinely like each other. Rather unusual in hyper-partisan Washington, these days.” The “Republicans for Obama” website even features Lugar, noting in an article, “Republican Richard Lugar endorses Obama,” that the Senator had praised Obama’s foreign policy decision to engage America’s enemies. http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45363 More on Lugar Lugar worked with Biden to ratify the LOST. If that does not tell you everything you need to know about Lugar nothing will. A Republican working with Biden on anything was a disgrace. Working with Biden to ratify a UN Treaty was treason. I do not use the word treason lightly. Jim ONeill states it best in this excerpt from his column in part two: Lugar personifies the very definition of treason. Admiral Locklear was Lugar’s man in the military when he and Biden were working to ratify the LOST. The MSM once promoted Richard Lugar as presidential timber. That should tell everyone where the press’ loyalties reside. Finally, let’s not stop at three. Multiples of three count, too. Three, six, nine, or fifteen is only a beginning. It’s just as hard to change the Republican party from within as it is to change the Democrat party from without. Romney/Gingrich/Santorum prove it. If you want further proof of where the Republican party stands ask all three about US membership in the UN. And just for good measure ask them what they think about UN Treaties in general; not just the LOST, but the concept of UN Treaties?
PART TWO: A Man for all Treasons and the US Constitution Jim ONeill Monday, March 19, 2012 “Breathes there the man with soul so dead Who never to himself hath said, This is my own, my native land! ...If such there breathe, go, mark him well; ...The wretch, concentred all in self, ... doubly dying, shall go down To the vile dust from whence he sprung, Unwept, unhonored , and unsung.” —Sir Walter Scott (1771-1832) excerpt from “The Lay of the Last Minstrel” “If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” James Madison (1751-1836) “Father of the US Constitution (Federalist #51) The Campaigner in Chief, Barack Hussein Obama, is of course only the most visible element of a vast left-wing conspiracy. Take a stroll through “Discover the Networks” if you doubt me—the “Tides Foundation” is a good place to start. (Note: the connections are so widespread that the webpage may take some time to load—be patient, the network will eventually appear). You may as well add Republican neo-cons and RINOs to that list, as they are left-wing as well—that is, they support big government and totalitarian rule. True American patriots among our elected officials are scarcer than hen’s teeth these days. Treason is de rigueur among our political elites—although they certainly do not call it that. Nonetheless, treason it is. Obama One World Government By treason I mean attitudes, motives, speech and/or activities that are not simply un-American, but are squarely anti-American in intent and effect. Within the past few years we have seen economic treason, judicial treason, and political treason to name just a few. The great number of treasonous activities presently going on in this country precludes me from making an in-depth analysis, but I will attempt something of an overview. Rightly or wrongly Obama is seen by various treasonous factions in America as being their figurehead; as representing their interests, and he may therefore in that sense be seen as a man for all treasons. Yet it is not Obama that I wish to focus on in this article, but rather two of the major forms of treason that are prevalent in America today. I am referring to one-world-government and anti-Constitutionalism. Permit me a brief aside: while I believe in the sentiment “I may not agree with what you say, but I I will fight for your right to say it,” I draw the line at treason. If someone champions one-world-government over the national interests of the United States, then I say “Get the h—l out of my country.” I’ll be dam-ned if I will defend their right to be a traitor. Let me be crystal clear here—I mean treason against the United States of America as a free republic under Constitutional law. MSM continues its transformation from the Fourth Estate into a Fifth Column The US Secretary of Defense recently told Congress that he gets his marching orders from the United Nations, not the US Congress. We have a US Navy that now advertises itself as “A global force for good.” I can remember a time when the US Navy’s job was to protect the United States—period. When did we become the world’s police force, and why? Meanwhile, the MSM continues its transformation from the Fourth Estate into a Fifth Column. The “merchants of death” aka the “military/industrial complex” are making out like bandits, while our rank and file military pay the price—and a dear one it is. They have been, and are being, stabbed in the back by “corporate criminals playing with tanks.” Behind all the sturm und drang, song and dance of competing ideologies, behind all the smoke and mirrors, a relatively small international cabal of very wealthy elitists stand poised to take over the world. If you do not understand that, then you have not been doing your “homework.” One-world-government means slavery for “we the people,” our children, and so on in perpetuity. The elitists do their best to put a “smiley face” on it, but slavery it is, and slavery it will be. The elitists have understood that nation-states stood in the way of their global dominance for quite some time—and none more so than the USA. They have been so successful in their efforts to tear apart and destroy America that treason goes on in the highest levels of our government largely unopposed, unremarked upon, or even noticed. Quite some time ago Edward Everett Hale (1822‚Äì1909) wrote a story about an American (a “poor creature” who disowned the United States. Hale wrote the story “by way of showing young Americans of to-day [sic] what it is to be A MAN WITHOUT A COUNTRY.” For many years Hale’s story “The Man Without a Country” was a staple in our nation’s schools. Today it would be considered retardataire and as quaint as…well, as the US Constitution. The Progressives of today are all men and women without a country—“poor creatures” indeed. “Sacred oaths” and words of honor to defend the Constitution notwithstanding, today’s politicians, judges, and top military brass largely ignore it. They have all taken the oath, so that makes them all dishonorable liars and/or cowards. Do these feckless frauds even care? Do the concepts of duty, integrity and honor mean anything to them? They probably consider such virtues to be foolishness, meaningful only to chumps and losers. Regardless of how they feel, “we the people” must rally around the US Constitution and defend it—with our lives if need be. The Declaration of Independence says that all men are created equal, by which is meant that all humans are naturally born free. Our natural state is freedom, but the globalists want to take away our God-given freedom and replace it with man-made “rights,” which they can make or break as they see fit. I recall how people in the US used to wonder how a civilized society like Germany lost its freedom and ended up being in thrall to a dictator such as Hitler. Well now we know, don’t we? All we have to do is look around us to see the answer. But enough of that—time to move on to the Constitution. http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45345
