Time for Article Five, Convention of States?

I believe there should be an unlimited number of parties, perhaps even a parliamentary system instituted, so that the officials will actually have to be concerned with representing the wishes of the people whose votes they seek. Today, the dems/repubs can take whole sections of the country for granted and trample over their desires, simply because they have NO OTHER CHOICE, which makes for a terrible system.

 

Should it ever come into my head to advocate such a position I'm sure I'll be tickled to death to have your permission.

who the hell cares

 

Trump is still bound by the Constitution.

Bummer, huh. LOL!

 

Maybe it'll come to your head to advocate any position. Then I could stop guessing.

 

The Constitution says that the Constitution can be amended or revised. In fact, it's not even our first governing document, it's the second. That said, I don't particularly want a revision of the Constitution, but I will defend their right to try to change it. The actual process is pretty hard, so I doubt it could be revised and ratified, especially with the state of politics today.It requires either 2/3 of both Houses of Congress, or 2/3 of the state legislature to agree to have one. It requires the legislatures of 3/4 of the states to ratify it.

 

Should we get rid of the last 27 of the amendments? Or just the 17 since the Bill of Rights?