TO PEE OR NOT TO PEE Makes sense to me. Sounds like an excellent plan too. I have a job. I work, and they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test (with which I have no problem). What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test. So, here is my question: Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare cheque because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their Bottom----doing drugs while I work. Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check? I guess we could call the program "URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"! Pass this along if you agree, or simply delete if you don't. Hope you all will pass it along, though. Something has to change in this country .. AND SOON! Oh, and also, all politicians should have to pass a urine test too! I wonder how many would be left in power?
The number of companies testing has dropped from about 77% to 66%. Why? They were rejecting too many of the best potential employees. And it's entirely legal in many States now. So gGet off your high horse. 10:1 says you get hammered on booze and complain about pot smokers. Drunks kill far more people than potheads do. And people die from booze overdoses every day. To date there are maybe 3-5 deaths, no more than a handful, attributable to pot overdoses - and only when edibles came along because you can consume far more than is possible if smoking the stuff. I'd be much safer if the roads were populated by potheads instead of raving drunks.
I gave both drank till i passed out and smoked Pot and driven. I have long said that my opinion is one is safer on pot than on booze. However that is not scientific. Around here we have had maybe 4 killed this past week in traffic accidents and the drivers were pot using. Following article comes earlier, but perhaps that I saw on TV has to be legally confirmed. The accidents I speak of are. https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/08...ns-veers-off-highway-flyover-in-walnut-creek/ https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/05...cannabis-friendly-states/?clearUserState=true This says drunken but I believe on TV the claim is pot smoking. Two Antioch teenagers are dead and three others are injured after an 18-year-old woman suspected of drunken driving plunged off a highway-interchange flyover in Walnut Creek early Sunday and crashed onto the asphalt below, authorities said. The driver, in a silver 2000 Honda Civic with four passengers, was headed eastbound on Highway 24 around 4 a.m. Sunday, approaching the Interstate 680 interchange when the crash occurred. The car dropped about 40 to 50 feet, according to the California Highway Patrol. The CHP described the crash as “tragic.” A relative of the injured driver said the young woman is a recent graduate of an Antioch high school — a good student who was planning to soon head off to college. Now, she and two other young women are hospitalized with major injuries, the CHP said. View image on Twitter
