Tony Abbott knights Prince Philip

I think it's comical you make this statement: "I don't think Angus Houston deserved one. These things are not military order's". Lol! If anyone deserved it on the basis of historical context to which this honour has derived then Houston deserves it more!

I think it shows the depths of your ability to reason with yourself....you guys are rediculous in the extent you go to support someone blissfully based on party lines

 

You Sir, are an outright liar, no wonder you support Abbott for anything the criminal says, maybe you are Abbott. You change the post to suit yourself, then you do not reply to the argument, instead you use stupid childish insults to denigrate your opposition. Like your God Abbott you have absolutely nothing except crap, lies and deceitful comments.

You say I am angry.... YOU HAVE NO IDEA MY DEAR FRIEND JUST HOW BLOODY ANGRY I AM.

We are not talking about some foolish politician, we are talking about a criminal, that has NO LEGAL RIGHT to even be the Prime Minister. We are talking about a moron that is hell bent on destroying not only our country, but freedom and civilisation. He is a racist, he is a sexist, he is homophobic, he is fascist and worst of all he refuses to renounce his allegiance to a foreign power.

You said ...

Now I just thought you were ignorant of the truth so I posted ...

Then AM threw in his 2 cents worth criticising wiki as my link (note: I do back up my words with links) so I posted this ....

Note the words in blue ...

This is what you EDITED out when you quoted me, your defense was that it isn't relevant but then you go on to say ....

Exactly what I said, but edited out of your version of what I said as you are WRONG and as you cannot be wrong you edited my post and LIED. You are a LIAR

 

Lol, dont have a heartattack in your moment of delusion. Except you came out of the gate against my view, go back and read the progression of the thread. I'm allowed to have an opinion and I'm not responsible for it it upsets you - that is no justification to attack people dude. You jumped on my opinion belittling it, and tried to defend your own with dictionary definitions which are not relevent - that is what I was responding too, and that is why your mention of my point was irrelevent and therefore not included in the quote. I could tell your really angry, because your always angry over nothing and your points dont add up usually, its the langauge of the political left, 'emotion poo flinging', it has no real substance - just noise and mess, solved by banner waving and bullying.

 

He can't, I asked him yesterday, as usual, he is all urine and wind.

 

Who said you are not allowed an opinion.you shoot your mouth off all the time. It is editing out my quote, then saying exactly the same thing and then insulting me however I take offence too. Why don't you read back ...oh you don't have to, I quoted all relevent parts UNEDITED

 

BS, I was arguing the point of whether a knight should be a military order. The point you were defending. I dont care if you agree with your own point or not, that is on you not me. Your original post is there for all to read so I have done you no wrong. If that is all youve got then it shows the vacuous nature of your approach I guess.

 

You should try reading my posts before replying to them. Or it could be that you did actually read them but failed to understand. The words you didn't understand are "what is the reality" and "modern times".

 

Still have not answered my question

- - - Updated - - -

Still have not answered my question

 

He cannot answer it, I have asked him, you have asked him, as usual he has nothing.

 

The BS is right, everything you have said is BS. Again you are a liar, like your God, or maybe you are he himself, Abbott you have no idea what the truth is. The only one who is arguing whether or not it should be a military order is YOU.

Every line of every argument you have put forward here is a lie.

I never said it was, nor should be a military order. YOU said that it wasn't, as did I, but when you quoted me on that you conveniently edited out where I said that historically it was a military order, but now in recent times is an order of merit. After you deleted what I wrote, you wrote exactly the same thing, that kind of a lie is called plagiarism. It is deceitful and cowardly and worthy of an Abbott supporter because that is ALL you have.

My argument is that you say that

What I tried to explain to you is that they (knighthoods) began as a military order, but in the last 60 or so years are basically an award of merit. But to say that a soldier who served our country with such service should not get one, BECAUSE it is not a military order is in my opinion disgusting. To say though that a foreigner should get one, an award of merit for ........ (Adultmale please help us here, what has PP done for Australia) is verging on being a traitor.

This is the last time I will respond because really, YOU are just not worth my effort. Your continuing lies, misquotes, editing. my quotes and just plain garbage is really an insult to even expect a reasonable response.

I will let the forum be my judge.

 

Depends on your definition of modern times, if you mean since the last one to receive one, then zero, you are correct. If you use the common definition of modern times, that is from 1900 onward (e.g. Modern warfare) but it is really since the 1800's which were the middle ages. That is the soldiers in the middle ages rode horses and wore armour, where in modern times they drove tanks etc.

Of course you will have YOUR definition to ensure you are right. LMAO

 

I have no problem with this. Australia and Britain have inseparable histories no matter what these so called "Republicans" or other "anti-British Australians" have to say.

I couldn't care less whether the country was governed by Aboriginals in regards to this. The fact will always be that British people were by large responsible for the construction of civilization here. Their descendants- the majority of Australians today- are the only reason why this nation didn't become part of the Japanese Empire or a typical Communist nation. Nothing you can do will ever change that.

Perhaps my only minor concern is that Prince Philip has very little to do with Australia. Nonetheless, some people have a problem with this simply because he is British. That is just absurd "reverse discrimination" from politically correct fools who want to distance Australia from its real history and follow some deluded tale that the original inhabitants were so peaceful and prosperous before "evil colonialists" ruined their way of life.

There are some absurd criticisms of the Abbott government flying around. People *always* have a habit of viewing the current government as being worse than the "alternatives" or some past government. Many Americans on this forum feel the same way about Obama. The British about Cameron. Maybe Shorten will be the next Prime Minister and the same old thing will continue. And some people will look back on previous governments and have a less biased stance on them. And others still will be bitter about every single government in their whole lifetime.

 

You don't have a very good grasp of history do you

 

twist, wiggle, wiggle, squirm, twist. Just love the way you lefties perform when you are caught out making stupid statements.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_knights_and_dames

Count 'em and then tell us how many Australian Dames and knighthoods were bestowed for military services since WW1 and how many in total.

 

That's a good little puppy, move the goal post, your bum chum Tonee would be so proud of you. You see you don't even understand the most simple things, I KNEW exactly what your response would be an preempted your response. If you had of read it and comprehended that I was having a lend of your typical response, I stated that you would define your own version of "modern" to be since the last one was given out so you would be right. You are correct, you are much more knowledgeable than me, but that's not hard if you change the rules as you go. Yes you are correct.

I pay homage to a greater mind then mine, Adultmale, he has figured out that no knighthoods have been awarded to a soldier since the last time a soldier was awarded a knighthood. Good work, no wonder Abbott got elected with people like you and AT voting for him.

PMSL

Now I was going to comment on your link, but you never believe me so let me quote a more intelligent person than I am.

twist, wiggle, wiggle, squirm, twist

 

KNIGHT (AK) IN THE GENERAL DIVISION OF THE ORDER OF AUSTRALIA

Air Chief Marshal Angus HOUSTON AC AFC (Retd), Canberra


For extraordinary and pre-eminent achievement and merit in service to Australia, through
distinguished service in the Australian Defence Force, continued commitment to serve
the nation in leadership roles, particularly the national responses to the MH370 and
MH17 disasters, and in a variety of roles in the community

 

Har har har... I knew you were going to have trouble with reality, most lefties do. The reality that you cannot deal with because it contradicts your stupid statements, is that no (well one or two) Dames or Kighthoods have been bestowed for military service in the last 80 years.

 

Har har har! You found one! But it wasn't just for military service was it.

 

backtrack backtrack backtrack For God sake man, grow some balls and admit you are WRONG WRONG WRONG

Lieutenant General Sir Donald Beaumont Dunstan, AC, KBE, CB

Pity we haven't had more wars eh?

 

and what stupid statement is that .....

This one ...

or this one ...

Oh. That's not MY stupid statement it's YOURS


It's so easy ROFL

 

You know of nothing, I know of nothing, Bowerbird knows of nothing, Robot knows of nothing, maybe that is because he has done nothing.

He doesn't have to be an Australian citizen, that was changed in the Order so Chucky boy could get one. as for what you wrote (highlighted), what utter rubbish.

 

twist, wiggle, wiggle, squirm, twist. Just love the way you righties perform when you are caught out making stupid statements. ROFL

 

Some would claim differently.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/dec/28/monarchy.davidsmith

 

But who has done any research to find out if Prince Phillip has done anything specifically for Australia? You claim he has done nothing, so tell us how you know that.
I know you don't like it because you are wrong in your claim that knighthoods are awarded for military service but the fact is, the reality is that in the last 80yrs very, very, very few have been awarded for military service.