Top former intelligence bosses speak out in favor of John Brennan

Well, it looks like Trump will be busy revoking 175 clearances.

 

That strikes me as a very irresponsible reply.

 

The reality is, these men are supporting Brennan being political, and they must also support him spying on the the CIA's own oversight committee. Dangerous when a powerful, secretive intel agency does something like this. But perhaps all of the prior intel people think they are above our constitution? And are powers within themselves? I find these men quite dangerous, and we seem to only get these sorts as heads of intel.

When the CIA is able to get a president 6 ways from sunday, so presidents should be very careful when it comes to being over the CIA, this does not bear well for any of these intel people who side with Brennan.

JFK should have lived long enough to take on a much less powerful CIA, break it up, reorganize it. He saw the great dangers of it back in the early 60s. Even fired Dulles. With JFK out of the way, the CIA grew in power, to the point that now they can get a president 6 ways from sunday as schumer told the nation. MSM was not at all concerned about what this made the CIA look like, the reality of it. Astounding, unless you live in wonderland with alice.

 

My comment couldn't have been more responsible.

 

Obama backed away from his redline with his tail tucked between his legs. Syria was still fighting ISIS, so a truly damaging strike would have been counter productive to US interests. You folks will whine about Trump regardless of how right he is...

 

This just proves that everyone has rights and those rights extend to Tata and Tata has an absolute right to be wrong and his is very wrong on this ditty.
Voting for anything Communist or Russian is bothersome and before I render a decision / opinion I would like to hear what possed young Brennan to do that. Was some young college kids prank? What itba frat dare?n

 

Sure, because that is how you think.

 

How do I think?