b.s from you as usuual which is no surprise since you have proved you have never done any research into this. you need to ask yourself that question although its pretty obvious to us both its the latter.dont expect me to read your next moronic post in reply.
If you say so muppet. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHGllrXsgEI"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHGllrXsgEI[/ame]
Before I just skimmed through the posts of Jims here but NOW I have read through all of his entire posts and this is indeed the real Jim Fetzer alright and the fact that there are posters here attacking him is proof that we got paid shills here afraid of the truth getting out.the problem is the more and more you attack him,the more and more you all lose your credibility and show your ignorance because Jim is someone far more knowledgeable about 9/11 than all of us here combined so the ones that want to keep attacking him, go on making fools of yourself then,all your doing is showing your true agenga which is to do what your hanlders pay you to do,try to derail 9/1 truth discussions but to no avail constantly proving you all have done no research into this.
Why is it you can't address the lies Jim told? BTW, how does someone cutting and pasting from Jim's website prove it is Jim?
QUOTE=NAB;1061088136]If you say so muppet. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHGllrXsgEI"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHGllrXsgEI[/ame][/QUOTE] as usual,you prove you have done no research into this case other than what the corporate media have told you,nice job. well since you showed a video I thought I would actually address this post.Unlike you Bush dupes,I dont run away and hide from opposing views like you all do constantly when shown videos.I always address videos. I have said many times you all have no debating skills because you all always run away from the points brought up in videos and never watch them which you all have proved in spades so many times before in the past. well I would be a hypocrite if I did not watch that video and be doing the exact same thing so I am not about to do that. That being said,congrats,as always you prove how easy you are to be brainwashed by the CIA controlled media.That interview wasnt done until AFTER 9/11. They got to Robertson because he fails to mention the witness testimonys of many critical ones who said they heard explosions and were thrown upwards to the top of the ceiling around the time the plane hit,an impossible feat done by an airliner. Plus Robertson was just a JUNIOR partner in the firm that designed the towers.The sr partner John Skillet as Jim can tell you,stated back in the 90's they were designed in mind with an airliner traveling at speeds up to 600 mph.all publicy known facts.Must be frustrating to be you,having to have to keep coming back here constantly to have your head handed to you on a platter. Here it is.checkmate,as always,you lose the game. game over.9/11 winner,NAB loser,as always.time to cry in defeat.or in your case make things up to avoid admitting it.lol http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/05/world-trade-center-building-designers.html
I see you responded in your typical grammatically challenged and ham-fisted manner muppet. I suppose you can't be bothered to throw up the white paper as a response? Herp derp, etc. Edit, I see you added a link. You do realize that the building didn't collapse direct from the impact right?
ah typical post of yours,changing the topic and making personal attacks when defeated,failing to address any facts after defeat.thanks for proving to everybody that comes here what a sore loser you are when defeated. Hey fellow truthers,doesnt this guy amuse you? Like i said,he changes the subject after getting his head handed to him on a platter and goes on a personal attack instead of doing the mature thing admitting defeat.Typical ploy.as always,he has exposed his true agenda here.kinda funny thats all the OCTAS are capable of doing around here as they demonstrated with Jim as well.
I love how "I have done credible research" has been redefined to mean: "I surfed YouTube a bit." Why do credible truther researchers never come up with people's correct names? The man's name isn't John Skillet. From the interview in question: http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19930227&slug=1687698 Nowhere in the post trade center bombing interview from 1993 did "Jim Skillet" state that the "they were designed in mind with an airliner traveling at speeds up to 600 mph" Beyond that, never before in history has a structural engineer been incorrect about the limitations of their design. Never.
This nonsense all boils down to the supposed white paper, which was never implemented. Truthers always fail to look at the context of when the buildings were designed. WTF would they design it to take the impact of multiple planes travelling at 600mph in the 60's? Seriously...... Wind loads, were, obviously, their primary concern.
Well, If There Had Been A Collapse, It Should Have Taken About 97 Seconds. See The Study By Judy Wood In The 9/11 Conspiracy. I Can't Believe You Are Posting When You Are So Ignorant About All Of This. You Need To Find Better Ways To Waste Your Time.
the Truth Is What Matters. This Is A Perverse Attempt To Distort What I Have Said, Namely: That There Is No Higher Form Of Respect For The Deceased Than To Determine How And Why They Died. The Highest Form Of Disrespect For This Nation And Its Citizens Is To Attempt To Pervert And Distort The Truth About 9/11 As You Have Been Doing Here. That Is Despicable Conduct.
CHECK IT OUT. IT FOLLOWS FROM GALILEO'S LAW OF FALLING BODIES, WHICH LOSES ITS TIME SQUARED PROPERTY WHEN ONE FLOOR HITS ANOTHER FLOOR AND THE CLOCK BEGINS AGAIN. THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE AND DISPLAYS MASSIVE IGNORANCE ON YOUR PART. HERE IT IS: http://drjudywood.com/articles/BBE/BilliardBalls.html
MY INTERPRETATION IS THAT YOUR COMMENT WAS DIRECTED AT ONE OF MY CRITICS. MY IMPRESSION IS THAT WE ARE ON THE SAME SIDE, WHILE HANNIBAL, PATRIOT911 AND OTHERS ARE NOT. http://drjudywood.com/articles/BBE/BilliardBalls.html
Why can't Truther's get a consensus for the formatting/syntax/grammar of their posts? It's really bizarre how often you see these oddities in many of their posts. This thread is replete with some fine examples. Clearly, the work of Chinese source code written by agents in Beijing.......
Me thinks someone is using Mr. Fetzer's name without permission. And sullying his reputation as a scholar with such poor writing. Or if it IS the real Mr. Fetzer it's interesting how often he resorts to personal attacks given the way he criticized this tactic early on. But then given his performance in the debate I watched, this would not surprise me. So many of these points have been so thoroughly debunked using actual science that to see him using the claim "look at the pictures to see what really happened" with no regard to science or physics fits the MO he adopted in the debate as well.
Jim, why are you sourcing your own articles as evidence? That's not science, that's "See, I printed it so it is true."
He did the same thing in his debate with Mark Roberts. At the 18:00 mark of this debate he states that the the thing that qualifies David Ray Griffin, a theologian, to comment on controlled demoliton characteristics of WTC 7 is:"because he's a scholar. He's published more books than I have". [ame="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7639955686054850079"]Hardfire SCHOLARS FOR 9/11 TRUTH / FETZER / ROBERTS / WIECK / 3RD PROGRAM[/ame] If that isn't the response of an arrogant, egotistical blowhard, I don't know what is.
Here is refutation of Griffin's claims by an actual scientist. http://www.jod911.com/drg_nist_review_2_1.pdf 9/11_was_an_inside_job should find it particularly interesting since it debunks Griffin's book, something that 9/11_was_an_inside_job claims repeatedly has "never been done"
I'm gone a couple weeks and come back to find this Fetzer guy spamming Judy Wood links? Dude, seriously, linking to a nut who thinks space weapons zapped the towers as proof of another person's massive ignorance is the definition of foot-bullet. Also irony. And maybe a side dish of hypocrisy... Anyone care to summarize this thread in a paragraph? Hopefully a short paragraph?
THIS. Watching this clip now I remember this Fetzer guy. He was on FOX news a lot at one time, with his Holocaust denier buddy Kevin Barrett. They act like clowns on TV. Unfortunately in this clip everyone's acting a little clownish: talking over each other, exaggerated gestures....it's like watching pro-wrestling , which is too bad because Mark Roberts was making excellent points.
Balsamo's into some pretty kinky roleplay, so not surprising: Balsamo makes up his diagram. He takes numbers from one aircraft and insert them in a generic Vg diagram. TiffanyInLa/Balsamo took a Vg diagram like this. Exactly like this one. [snip] Balsamo, posing as a girl sock at ATS and other forums, took a Vg diagram and inserted Vspeeds for a 767. Making up evidence to support his delusions, hiding behind a sock. Not news, standard procedure from the 11.2g failed physics pilot who sells delusions. If you need lots of cookies, go over to ATS, see Balsamo starting threads about himself, spewing nonsense, posing as a girl, or implied girl, who is extremely dumb on 911. But hey, consenting adults...
