Trump Congratulates Wrong State for Kansas City Chiefs' Super Bowl win

We've also seen him in the two years since. lol

 

Quite right, in which he has delivered his speeches with aplomb. The right has consistently dug deep and even edited his speeches to support their fantasies about, what has been, a very solid Presidential record.

 

Lol like y’all weren’t saying this 2-3 years ago?

 

Oh, so the reason President Biden was able to outsmart the entire Republican caucus, during his State of the Union Address, was because Republicans don't know how to read a teleprompter, so couldn't see the setup coming?


Funny, if Biden is mentally as utterly incompetent as you claim, that this is not apparent to everyone. In point of fact, this is merely your own opinion, which, for your information, is no basis, upon which to accuse another person, of being "as dishonest as possible." It is actually you who is being a dishonest twit, to sling your insult of dishonesty at me, *merely for disagreeing with your opinion. Guess what bub-- you ain't always right. And this is a case-- among, I am sure, a sea of others-- in which you are dead wrong.

If you disagree, why don't you try offering an actual "argument," this time, if it is not beyond your own capacity, to do so? Your personal assessment, of Biden's mental acuity-- I hope you will not find it too shocking, to learn-- is not authoritative enough, on its own, to "prove" your case. Do you have anything else?

 

Why do you guys keep saying Biden outsmarted the GOP which is the same propaganda the MSM is pushing when he got called out on a blatant lie and then fact checked on his other lies?

 

I’m waiting for libs to call Biden, who for his entire life was a person in a position to tell us what we can an can’t do, a deep thinker.

 

Because we saw and heard President Biden do it!

Unlike you and the rest of the republicans, we WATCHED the State of the Union address. We didn’t wait for FAUX News to lie to us about what was said.

 

But .. "If I were a rich man"

 

Because, unlike you:
1) I watched the speech, so I saw him do it, with my own eyes.

2) I am not brainwashed, by a right wing echo chamber.
A. There were several Republican members of Congress, who were on the record, as being in favor of sunsetting all federal programs, on a regular basis. Senator Rick Scott-- every five years (he even has it on a website, if you don't believe me); and Sen. Ron Johnson-- every year! (Only a dope would miss that this is intended as a way to cut those "entitlement" programs, which Republicans always talk about trimming, but never have the guts, to take head on).

B. The following article, by The Hill, adds Mike Pence & Lindsey Graham, both whom have suggested that reforms need be made, and

C. the "Republican Study Committee," which includes the majority of the Republican House caucus, has also called for changes-- see snip, below.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehil...ns-social-security-medicare-debt-ceiling/amp/

<Snip>
Republican Study Committee
The Republican Study Committee, the largest conservative caucus in the House, has called for increasing the threshold for Medicare to 67 years of age and Social Security to 70 years of age in an effort to avoid the programs’ trust funds from becoming insolvent, per its fiscal 2023 budget. The group includes more than 150 Republican members of the House, the majority of the GOP caucus.
<End Snip>


D. Then there is this video, of Rep. Mike Lee (who'd been running for Senator), talking about Entitlements-- it is EPIC! "It will be my objective to phase out Social Security: to pull it up by the roots, and get rid of it!" Other good stuff, too. It does not get to that part, though, until about 7 1/2 minutes in, of the 10 min. video.
Enjoy:




So, that's why, first, I say that you are woefully misinformed, to call this, Biden's "lie." But please, by all means, offer us a clip of Hannity, saying that no Republican has suggested cutting Entitlements-- I could use the laugh.

Second, since the majority of the Republican caucus-- see snip, above-- had come out, in support of Social Security and Medicare reform, but Biden basically got them all-- even McCarthy-- in front of the nation, to applaud the idea of no changes to S.S. and Medicare, well...do I have to finish doing the math for you, to explain why we "guys, keep saying Biden outsmarted the GOP?"

 

and still we all know he was better than Trump

let's hope in 2024, these are not our two options again

 

Trump was a broken record, he could not stay on script for his life... Trump is just an elderly old man

and yes, Biden is an elderly old man too

 

TRump is a tRaitor AND an elderly old man ... with a brain inversely proportionate to his big ass.

 

LOLOLOL

You mean something pre prepared?

That's your evidence?

Just quit, there's mountains of evidence of his issues and everybody but the most blind partisans can see it.

 

My opinion is supported by a mountain of evidence.

Yours is supported by nothing.

Dance all you want but you can't get around that fact. Despite the fact that his handlers hide him from being able to speak without prepared statements, we still have loads of video evidence of him getting completely lost in his thoughts. You actually tried to use a pre prepared speech as evidence of his mental capacity.....nice try.

Love the personal insults by the way.

 

It was accurate then and it's accurate now. Just because it's getting worse doesn't mean there weren't issues two years ago.

And if he's so great and so mentally sharp, how come democrats don't want him to run again? Would you like to see that poll? There's a thread on it.

 

I will explain this once more, for not only you, but-- as a sort of public service announcement-- for anyone else who does not understand that their own opinion, is not considered as "evidence." Now, I am sure that you have reasons for having your "opinion"-- and those things which had convinced you, of your view, should typically come, after you state: "My opinion is supported by a mountain of evidence." But you follow your claim with not even a handful of dirt, from that mountainous "evidence." In other words: what is that evidence?