Trump Data Guru: I Tried to Team Up With Julian Assange

Except I'm saying the opposite, just blaming Russia IS as stupid as blaming that 2nd quarter holding call.

 

Is this what you are looking for?

 

Significantly, IMO. Trump always had to do damage control(some of his own doing), when people released Anti-Trump propaganda. The outright lie that Trump's words would "recruit terrorists" being one of the saddest points of mainstream Washington.

Our capitol hill was willing to collaborate with the enemy, to prevent Trump's victory. That was depressing.

 

That's the perfect meme to illustrate these new "investigations"

 

No it wouldn't by the time he asked the server had already been decommissioned. If they had been already hacked trying to find someone who had them is not a crime. Its a basic fundamental principle of law. Stolen evidence is not illegal provided the side introducing it did not play any part in the theft.

You need to stop playing lawyer.

 

Ukraine's admitted interference on behalf of the Hillary campaign is downright scary as they were trying to pull us into world war three.

 

you need to stop pretending to know.

 

Weird I never heard the complaining and hand wringing from the left when Sarah Palins 30k + emails were hacked. The Dems even asked for volunteers to sort through them.

 

While I didn't agree with Trump's decision to decertify, his ability to mitigate the situation with Syria has been absolutely crucial and a massive step towards restoring peace. The Obama State Department oversaw and caused multiple calamities.

 

No you do. This well established legal principle. There is nothing illegal in trying to obtain already stolen evidence. It happens all the time in out legal system. As long as the side introducing the evidence didn't play a part in the theft its perfectly legal.

 

and rwers are not complaining now. if someone asked someone to get, that is illegal.

 

that is the very definition of illegal, if you dont think so, try it

 

No matter how many times you say it doesnt make it true. And in the case of e-mail there is really no case at all. Laws surrounding the acquisition of stolen property are based around physical things like artwork.

An intent to defraud the rightful owner is required. In otherwirds you have to have the intent not to make the owner whole by not giving it back. In the case if e-mails we are dealing with copies.

 

Did you read any if my posts about possible Russian interference in our election? Or did you read my posts and failed to realize that I always said attempted interference because we do not know the bottom line affects of Russian attempts. I said ov,re and over Russia shoukd not even be allowed to attempt to interfered.

This is not a partisan issue so can the Democratic vs Republican Party accusations. This is about the integrity of the USCelection process.

It is also about the overblown ego of the Trumpocity. The Trump dies not want to entertain the truth that he won the EC but not the popular vote. So if Russia had an impact and if that caused him to win his ego is taking a slap. Trumpeizdas obviously do note care for their country but only for their phony and hypocritical "hero" so they (or maybe you) are doing and saying anything you can to deny thatvRussia even attempted to interfere. You are putting your love of you're Lying "hero" over country. Shame!

 

last reply

https://communications-media.lawyers.com/privacy-law/email-hacking-is-a-serious-crime.html

 

I get the legal ramifications but my point is what's good for the goose. Illegal and politicians aren't mutually exclusive.

 

With the evidence of collusion mounting against the Dems and their cohorts it seems the President won in spite of the Russians not because of them, don't you think?

 

You dont get it do you. This person approached wikileaks after the server was decommissioned. If e-mails were hacked that had already happened. You cant cause a crime after the crime has occured. what was being proposed was to do some sleuthing and find them if they had been hacked.

That is not illegal.

 

welll i agree, what is good for the goose. the person that hacked palins emails went to jail

 

And did anyone else who acquired those e-mails???

No!

Your argument is bull.

 

In order to totally cut off any ability for any nation to buy ads, to partiscipate in social media would require us to be like the old USSR, or NK. So how many more rights are you willing to give up so that russia or anyone has no access to those things mentioned?

For me, the idea that any nation could affect our elections has to assume that the voters are not trustworthy enough in intelligence to even vote. To not allow another nation access to communication in america is a 1984 hellhole. And it turns america into a totally controlled state, which we fought against for so long. It is like having to destroy a city in order to save it.

Since russia has never determined outcome on any of our elections, to act or think as if they have is the nonsense involved. I do not think it is possible for another nation to dictate election results. This is a fantasy, unless they can hack into the system and do it in that manner. So, if that is the fear, there are ways to make that impossible. I see this russian affecting outcomes as fear mongering, with an ulterior motive involved.

 

Which is a given when a clueless self-serving charlatan can convince some folks that he is anything more than a snake oil selling turd.

 

drats!!!! The left figured out how we won the election. Quick everyone run!

 

The answer is no. Hillary lost because shes an awful human being.

 

1. How did they interfere?
2. Why didn't Obama stop it?