Trump does not screw around...Whitehouse stops promoting the homosexual lifestyle

Cant debate him, call him a troll.

Typical leftist.

- - - Updated - - -

Ive absolutely supported every statement I have made, you just have not kept up with the thread.

I have picked apart his argument and showed him to be hypocritical in the process.

Keep up.

 

Sorry, my contact list is already full of people who refuse rational debate, but at least they have some thought provoking or entertaining posts. You repeating, "I've already proven you all to be stupid" lie without actually posting anything of substance is neither thought provoking nor entertaining.

- - - Updated - - -

You have put up nothing to debate

Seems no one has kept up with the thread... but you... strange
Guess you are the winner, congratz!

Bye now

 

No, its just you who hasn't.

You have yet to disprove any point that I have made, you simply just tell me to "make it again".

Well I wont, you should pay attention to the thread and keep up with it. Repeating the same thing over and over is redundant specifically when you will likely ignore it and say "nu uh!".

But the fact is I have proved you a hypocrite.

 

I've read post after post of yours on this thread and have not seen you contribute anything at all.

CD8ed is right - you are an empty vessel.

 

Your just a liberal such as he, your opinion is not to be trusted.

I have made my points that have yet to be refuted.

 

Wow, four people call you out and you are still going.
All you would have had to do is simply link to the post number where you made the responses but noooo... Troll and all that.

I don't like to block people but I'm tired of seeing your name in my feed

 

Because all you have to do is scroll up. I don't hold the hands of the purposefully ignorant.

 

The same as any left-wing agenda - to chip away at the pillars that hold up the foundation that society is based on. Stability is not a fertile ground for the left's goals to grow, so they agitate and destabilize society whenever possible, since chaos more easily allows them to gain power and enact their agenda. Anything that has promoted a stable society has been declared war on by the left. Homogenous racial and cultural structures are more stable, so they destabilized by flooding the country with non-whites who have different, often hostile cultures, from the majority. Having one unifying language promotes stability, so they seek to make the country bilingual with Spanish. Having a nuclear family unit promotes stability, so they destabilized by making marriages easier to get, promoted promiscuity in the form of "open relationships", promoted homosexuality, promoted the advancement of pornography and extreme sexual fetishes, and more.

Personally, I think a big part of the homosexual agenda is to make homosexuality seem as normal and common as heterosexuality, so that the homosexual population in the future will increase, which will give homosexuals more potential sex partners. A gay person who doesn't live in a concentrated area of gays like San Francisco or Long Beach often is frustrated by the fact that they see attractive people all around them, yet only 1 out of 50 people would find them attractive in return. Competition is very high for partners, and infidelity runs rampant throughout their community. Often, they are forced to share their partners, either willingly or unwillingly, similar to the situation that many single black women find themselves in with black males. It's a mess.

The goal would be to target those kids who fall somewhere in the middle between homosexual and heterosexual, and could go either way based on their life experiences. I do think some people are born wired towards being homosexual, some are born wired towards being heterosexual, but I think there are some that fall somewhere in between. I knew one of these people growing up. Probably the most feminine boy I've ever known, and I would have wagered actual money that being homosexual was in his future. He grew up with only his mother and Grandmother in the house, without any male figures in his life at all. He befriended my half brother, and started going on some of our family camping trips. Fishing, hiking, shooting, offroading, dirt biking, etc. His femininity fell away several years later, to the point where it was hard to imagine he was ever that way. Now, he is a tall, handsome guy in his mid 20's with a beautiful blond fiancée. I sincerely believe that if it wasn't for those experiences in his life, he would have gone the other way.

 

This is hilarious. I love good comedy!

 

You guys are so sure that your agenda is what the majority wants in the US, yet you can't even be honest about your true goals. You have to disguise it as something else in order to gain acceptance. Not that that bothers you, since lying is a helpful way to advance the agenda and the ends justify the means, but it's still worth pointing out.

 

I fnind this very amusing. Christians have an agenda, the NFL has an agenda, Walmart has an agenda, conservatives have an agenda. All are trying to get thir views accepted. Keep the comedy coming.

 

The difference is none of those groups need to destabilize society in order to advance theirs, like the left.

 

And neither does the left. Unless you can prove that statement? LOL

 

Alinsky saw community structure and the impoverished and the importance of their empowerment as elements of community activism and used both as tools to create powerful, active organizations.[5] He also used shared social problems as external antagonists to “heighten local awareness of similarities among residents and their shared differences with outsiders”.[3] Ironically, this was one of Alinsky’s most powerful tools in community organizing; to bring a collective together, he would bring to light an issue that would stir up conflict with some agency to unite the group. This provided an organization with a specific “villain” to confront and made direct action easier to implement. These tactics as a result of decades of organizing efforts, along with many other lessons, were poured into Rules for Radicals to create the guidebook for community organization.[2]

Themes[edit]

Rules for Radicals has various themes. Among them is his use of symbol construction to strengthen the unity within an organization.[3] He would draw on loyalty to a particular church or religious affiliation to create a structured organization with which to operate. The reason being that symbols by which communities could identify themselves created structured organizations that were easier to mobilize in implementing direct action. Once the community was united behind a common symbol, Alinsky would find a common enemy for the community to be united against.

The use of common enemy against a community was another theme of Rules for Radicals, with nonviolent conflict as a uniting element in communities.[6]

Alinsky would find an external antagonist to turn into a "common enemy" for the community within which he was operating. Often, this would be a local politician or agency that had some involvement with activity concerning the community. Once the enemy was established, the community would come together in opposition of it. This management of conflict heightened awareness within the community as to the similarities its members shared as well as what differentiated them from those outside of their organization.[3] The use of conflict also allowed for the goal of the group to be clearly defined. With an established external antagonist, the community’s goal would be to defeat that enemy.[3]

Symbol construction helped to promote structured organization, which allowed for nonviolent conflict through another element in Alinsky’s teaching, direct action. Direct action created conflict situations that further established the unity of the community and promoted the accomplishment of achieving the community’s goal of defeating their common enemy.[2] It also brought issues the community was battling to the public eye. Alinsky encouraged over-the-top public demonstrations throughout Rules for Radicals that could not be ignored, and these tactics enabled his organization to progress their goals faster than through normal bureaucratic processes.[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_Radicals#Inspiration_for_Rules_for_Radicals

 

I am fairly conservative on most issues and lean right in almost all others - I do not believe the end goal of either the left or the right is to destabilize or destroy society - such rhetoric is why we are where we currently are. Each side simply has different ideals and ways they believe is best to achieve those ideals. Democrats do not understand basic human nature and see the absolute best in everyone; Republicans hold to old ideals, even when those ideals are shown to not be valid or warranted.

Both sides exist solely to win votes, while I will agree that the left is generally much more violent than the right the right has there own immoral methods, such as district gerrymandering.

I agree but I believe it is all simply to manipulate people to win votes

Here is where we divide, I view all of the above as having freedom to peruse happiness. Why does it matter if a couple agrees to an open relationship? Who does that harm? I agree marriages are too easily terminated but I don't see how a gay couple getting married or raising children damages society, maybe you can explain?

The goal is absolutely acceptance, just as everyone desires. I don't really believe homosexuality is chosen so I don't see the true number increasing - while we may see increases in people admitting to same sex attraction as people decide happiness is an option.

I am a conservative homosexual man in my very early 30's, never been through a traumatic event besides recently losing my mother, never been attracted to the opposite sex no matter how much I attempted, I own a small maintenance company, hunt, hike, fish, camp, grew up around proportionate males and females who enjoyed what you would refer to as typical gender specific activities - although my aunt enjoys hunting more than anyone I know. I am in a monogamous relationship (not married as neither of us see it as an option) to a deeply religious man of 7 years who enjoys similar activities. We donate and volunteer regularly. How do you feel we are destabilizing society? How would our union effect anyone else? Why are we so much less deserving of happiness than some heathen on their 5th relationship with numerous children from different partners? - something commonly seen in members of the right...

Thank you for the rational discourse, while I disagree with the general premise I appreciate the ability to have a conversation - that's why most of us are on PF, except the trolls who just want a podium.

 

That's nice. Shall we now discuss right wing groups? LOL

 

The proof is happening every day. Occupy Wall Street. Black Lives Matter. Riots, demonstrations, shutting down speakers at college campuses. The proof is everywhere.

 

If you think that will destabilize government you have no understanding of our government

 

They destabilize society. That's their purpose. Intimidating citizens.

 

Or peaceful protest which is the hallmark of any great society. You will always get a few that turn violent but sit ins and other civil disobedience often makes our society BETTER

 

Peaceful? LOL. You're not living in reality.

 

Yep peaceful. Some blacks fought back in the civil rights movement.....that does not dismiss the great things that movement accomplished.

 

What "movement"? What are the protests about?

 

Each has their own agenda. Take OWS. What about that movement is inherently violent? They are recreating the sit ins of the 60's at a higher level. They should be admired.

 

OWS? That complete failure that attracted Kanye West to show up to an OWS ralley in a 500 dollar shirt and something like 10K gold chain?

Hah. I remember that "movement". It was hilarious

- - - Updated - - -

There is no movement. It's a temper tantrum that's dissolving.