Trump now supports Vote by Mail. But... Only in Florida!!!

Then it should be no problem showing proof of the cities that ignore federal law and don't purge the rolls of the dead, those who have moved on or those supposedly living at addresses that are no longer functional.

 

It's not a federal law that's the problem. Constitutionally the states have a very free hand in regard to elections as do the cities in local elections.

 

But it is a law, right?

That aside, still no links to all these cities that never purge the rolls?

 

Utah, Florida and Arizona are not controlled by Democrats, so it's not a partisan issue in the states. Trump is lying.

More ballots being delivered means more ballots being returned. It does not mean more cheating. The opportunity to cheat has always been there. There is no magic number of ballots sent where cheating begins. If the incidence of cheating is .05% or whatever it is, it will remain so regardless of the number of ballots sent.

 

BS. You just don't get it because you don't want to.

 

I don't get it because nobody has explained it. "BS" isn't a very good argument.

 

Agreed. The country is not overflowing with corrupt citizens. They are pretty concentrated in DC. Some ballots will get sent to an old address. Not many, in perspective. Of those, a tiny fraction will attempt (not succeed) at voting fraudulently. Of those, a fraction will get through the screening process.

We're not talking about election changing numbers. Any fraud vote for one team will be offset by a fraud vote from another team.

Imagine the breathtaking number of people it would require to pull off a scheme that involves gathering the names and addresses of everyone who moved in the last year, getting to the owners of those addresses to convince them to vote, not only fraudulently, but to do so in favor of their team! My buddy Occam says, "nah, not going to happen."

 

Nobody has ever explained the motive behind donating one's time, energy and gas money, to risk federal prison in an activity that will have no effect on the outcome. Who would do that, and why?

 

Right? We're talking about 10's of votes, here. Such a nothing-burger.

 

The amount of planning, coordination and labor required to throw a presidential election is beyond implausible. Such a conspiracy is literally impossible in the real world. One reason is the amount of funding needed to accomplish this. Nobody is going to commit felonies for free, and who is funding the activity? No one could successfully cover the activity itself, but the money trail would stick out like a sore thumb.