Trump threatens to set supporters on Sanders' rallies

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by The Great Zeus, Mar 14, 2016.

  1. Genius

    Genius Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    1,706
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Actually, the dems have their msm "super pac" to shield them. You have to admit that. Who was more of a carnival barker in 2012 than harry reid on the senate floor and candy crawley injecting herself in a debate protecting Obama?
     
  2. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. Deckel

    Deckel Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2014
    Messages:
    17,608
    Likes Received:
    2,043
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump doesn't have to. His supporters will. Spite. Watch and learn the game.
     
  4. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    56
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yes Mr.Literal thats exactly what I said.
     
  5. TrackerSam

    TrackerSam Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    12,114
    Likes Received:
    5,379
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why? Afraid you're going to lose?
     
  6. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    71,777
    Likes Received:
    91,800
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Is this the same Harry Reid who said the Washington Redskins nickname is racist?
     
  7. The Great Zeus

    The Great Zeus New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    2,483
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Dude, you are either an incredibly sad troll or pathetically stupid.

    Either way, you may want to think a bit more before hitting that 'post reply' button.

    Not at all.

    I just want to see Trump become some big Mexican's prison b1tch.
     
  8. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanks for proving my point.
     
  9. The Great Zeus

    The Great Zeus New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    2,483
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL.

    Sad Troll strikes again!
     
  10. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    At least you admit your posts are troll posts. Thanks for pointing that out.
     
  11. The Great Zeus

    The Great Zeus New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    2,483
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Congratulations! You just made it in to the top 5 percent of the dumbest people here.

    That's quite an accomplishment. Now, run along and go find some mud to play in.
     
  12. GeddonM3

    GeddonM3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2010
    Messages:
    20,283
    Likes Received:
    407
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Hmmm, the only supporters I have seen shooting guns are liberals and such. The only group I have seen stopping free speech has been liberals. You keep describing the liberal base with "gun toting radicals" yet you try and describe Trump supporters.

    You perfectly fit the lying, agenda driven, out of touch with reality liberal voting base who is actually purposely starting trouble.
     
  13. The Great Zeus

    The Great Zeus New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    2,483
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]

    This Trump supporter shoots guns quite often, I believe.
     
  14. GeddonM3

    GeddonM3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2010
    Messages:
    20,283
    Likes Received:
    407
    Trophy Points:
    83

    [video=youtube;cW_wNGite3c]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cW_wNGite3c[/video]
     
  15. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    71,777
    Likes Received:
    91,800
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Get a grip, you have a bomb maker who wanted to blow up police stations as one of your supporters
     
  16. The Great Zeus

    The Great Zeus New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    2,483
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You think I'm Bernie? :D

    I'm not running for office, dude. I have no "supporters." Unless you mean those who make me the occasional offering every now and then.

    So yeah, I guess I do have some supporters, after all. I'm still not running for anything, however.
     
  17. Space_Time

    Space_Time Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2015
    Messages:
    12,590
    Likes Received:
    1,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What do we think of the Trump followers/BML comparison when it comes to agressive political behavior?

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trumps-reckless-rhetoric-1458081883

    Donald Trump’s Reckless Rhetoric
    He says he’s not responsible for the bad behavior of his supporters. That’s what liberal activists said about the looters and arsonists in Baltimore and Ferguson, Mo.
    By JASON L. RILEY
    March 15, 2016 6:44 p.m. ET
    2 COMMENTS
    In 1967 the liberal New Republic magazine ran an editorial titled “Blow Up the Cities.” It meant literally. The article hailed “the promise of the riots” that had been traumatizing the country’s largest population hubs.

    “Terrifying as the looting, the shooting, the arson are,” wrote the editors, “they could mean a gain for the nation if, as a result, white America were shocked into looking at itself, its cities, its neglect.” The editorial concluded, “The national commitment needed to bring racial justice to the cities is unlikely until New York, Chicago or Los Angeles is brought to an indefinite standstill by a well-organized guerilla action against the white establishment.”

    The 1965 race riots that started in the Watts section of Los Angeles resulted in 4,000 arrests and 34 deaths. The 1967 riots in Newark, N.J., claimed 23 lives and left 600 injured. Rioting in Detroit the same year caused 43 deaths and destroyed 2,500 businesses.

    “Groping for perspective,” wrote Taylor Branch in “At Canaan’s Edge,” his civil-rights history, “a shell-shocked New York Times editorial observed that the cumulative toll from Newark and Detroit fell far beneath the Pentagon’s latest casualty report in Vietnam.” Relax, folks. Detroit was still safer than wartime Saigon.

    Anti-Trump protesters on March 11 after a rally on the campus of the University of Illinois at Chicago was canceled due to security concerns. ENLARGE
    Anti-Trump protesters on March 11 after a rally on the campus of the University of Illinois at Chicago was canceled due to security concerns. PHOTO: CHARLES REX ARBOGAST/ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Of course, the media’s decision to condone and encourage this violent upheaval reflected orthodox liberal thinking among civil-rights organizations, politicians and leading black activists of the period. The rioting that erupted in Washington, D.C., after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. was described by the head of the local Urban League as a “low form of communication by people who seek to get a response from society that seems to be deaf to their needs.” Harlem Congressman Adam Clayton Powell said that riots were “a necessary phase of the black revolution.” H. Rap Brown, the former Black Panther, called for “guerilla war on the honkie white man” and said that “Violence is necessary. It is as American as cherry pie.”

    In his history of urban America, “The Future Once Happened Here,” Fred Siegel wrote that in the 1960s black radicals in the U.S. began presenting their methods as part of the Third World rebellion against colonial rule. “If ghettoes constitute a kind of colony, then it follows that the riots were more analogous to uprisings,” wrote Mr. Siegel. “Liberation meant more than securing rights, it meant taking control of the black community and liberating it from the ‘occupying army’ of white police, social workers, landlords, and owners of small businesses.”

    Donald Trump’s reckless rhetoric over the past week has been roundly condemned by everyone save his core supporters, for whom nothing that he says or does is disqualifying. But only a fool believes that the violence at these Trump campaign rallies will be confined to those rallies if it continues. History strongly suggests otherwise, and television images of blacks and whites fist-fighting at the University of Illinois at Chicago last week evokes that ugly history.

    “When you are inciting mob violence, which is what Trump is doing in those clips, there’s a lot of memories that people have,” Hillary Clinton told a town hall audience in Springfield, Mass., on Monday. She’s right, but where was Mrs. Clinton’s outrage at the intolerant activists who have disrupted events featuring her Democratic presidential rivals?

    Last August, Black Lives Matter protesters refused to let Bernie Sanders speak at a rally in Seattle. A month earlier, they repeatedly interrupted a Netroots Nation forum in Phoenix for Mr. Sanders and Martin O’Malley. Black Lives Matter protesters have physically harassed colleges students and chased them out of buildings. They have shut down major thoroughfares in large cities during rush hour. And they have assaulted police officers at demonstrations.

    Mr. Trump insists that he is merely channeling the frustrations of voters who are fed up with a political class that seems indifferent to the plight of the working class. But he is also exploiting racial and ethnic fears, purposefully alienating religious minorities, and if not inciting violence then certainly not discouraging it. He is pursuing a political agenda based on threat, intimidation and insult. It’s a brand of identity politics that has animated the post-civil-rights left and that continues to this day.

    Mr. Trump says he’s not responsible for the bad behavior of his supporters, which is exactly what liberal activists said about the looters and arsonists in Baltimore and Ferguson, Mo. Even so, Mr. Trump is wholly responsible for his reaction to this behavior, and to his discredit he has chosen to escalate tensions. After seven years of racial retrogression under President Obama, that’s the last thing the country needs.

    Mr. Riley, a Manhattan Institute senior fellow and Journal contributor, is the author of “Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed” (Encounter Books, 2014).
     
  18. Uber Lib

    Uber Lib New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2015
    Messages:
    3,058
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    you admit it's past tense, he did his time, but just can't get over the your silly obsessions
     
  19. Vernan89188

    Vernan89188 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2014
    Messages:
    8,685
    Likes Received:
    2,072
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No..it was the tea party conservative, don't give credit to Obama for nothing, Nothing good at least (they will even vote in a circus of clowns, in the senate, congress and Cruz) then they want to revert back to ...what is it called "nationalism" No sir...I cannot change the mind frame of people whom think like you..After the economy was fixed,(yep dont see no economy threads anymore) your kinds reverted to pure blood theory and Libs taking it away..too bad so sad..As a mutt..like most here, we dont give a S$%t about that.

    You are right..It is the end of Obama's term...I am pretty much done with politics, and paying attention to crap I cannot nor will ever put the effort to change aside from my vote.
    I vote democrat...they at least got there stuff together and dont guarantee they will butt f$%k you with a sandpaper condom, and start another war. It is what it is.
     
  20. GeddonM3

    GeddonM3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2010
    Messages:
    20,283
    Likes Received:
    407
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Nationalism and my kind? who are my kind exactly? You mean the ones who are against illegal immigration , believe in the 1st and 2nd amendment , actually care more about the future and well being of the country rather than kiss another country's arses and taking that so called "sandpaper condom" up the butt?

    Im sorry but liberal policies are much more dangerous to us internally than anyone elses, and I don't need to create lies to prove it like the left loves to do to create a false narrative and pass it off as truth. Your politicians only care about flooding the country with immigrants they know will vote democrat, the last thing they care about is diversity and compassion, it's all a numbers game. Our safety and the future of the country be damned, the votes are what the democrats are much more interested in to keep them in absolute power. And the fact that the liberal politician will not be affected by their failed policies and outlook, never be held responsible for their mistakes and ill will brought upon us is the reason they do not mind creating racial tensions and allowing illegal immigrants to do as they please.

    Your party is a true rapist of this country, they sell out for votes.
     
  21. Vernan89188

    Vernan89188 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2014
    Messages:
    8,685
    Likes Received:
    2,072
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where do you (And your ilk) get this BS??
    I have to know couse now you are not the first person to spout this crap. Not only would that just be a bad idea, and a guarantee fail, It is not even a solution to the fact Democrats just straight are better anyways...gimme a link with this crap, I'm tired of hearing it and this is the best your people come up with...Ohhhh getting more votes..If anything Mexico fits the conservative party, and so do the Refugees aside from skin color, your guys fit right along in social policy's!

    Edit: If you are the anti Obama tea party conservative type I mean. The regular Republicans make since at times
     
  22. GeddonM3

    GeddonM3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2010
    Messages:
    20,283
    Likes Received:
    407
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I am mexican and I don't roll with the tea party. I have defended them from liberals like yourself who want to make up lies saying they are violent and such, when they did not get violent at all. In the meantime you liberals justify the racist and violent actions of groups like La RAza, Aztlan, BLM and idiot liberal groups like the Occutard movement.

    No, considering you have those groups that cause true violence and havok you are not an ounce better than the right wing, and saying you are is nothing more than an admission to your typical hypocrisy.

    and coming from Los Angeles i see how you liberals add diversity. (*)(*)(*)(*)ing elitist lilly white liberals keep their areas property value sky high, pushing blacks and hispanics away from "invading" their pearly gates. Yet you want to say you guys value diversity? When in fact you guys do the exact opposite, keeping us cattled to certain areas and just use us for votes. Then in those liberal lands we still had the (*)(*)(*)(*)tiest schools, while the lilly white libs kept their schools nice and clean and got most of the funding? Then make gun laws on us law abiding citizens so it's harder to obtain a weapon to protect ourselves from the criminals? Never do you (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s every go after the criminals, instead you make us easy targets.

    jim Crow 2.0 right in front of your eyes, yet you have your head stuck so far up your butt and cling to BS liberal talking points like a *******n sheep you don't realize what your masters are doing. They run the plantations and you ignore it.

    >>>MOD EDIT Flamebait Removed<<<

    Sorry, I refuse to be another minority who is told how to think and ruled by my liberal MASSAS!!!!
     
    vman12 likes this.

Share This Page