Trump's Economy Still Unable to Rise above 3% Growth

There you go again denying that you made your own statements.

 

There are the same mindless statements. Bizarre.

 

Mr. Landbrecht,

Give them what they want to hear; Trump's economy will annually grow beyond 3% during his two terms, it is invincible, and recession proof.

 

Worked for Reagan. The recession came when 41 raised income tax rates.

 

Quote; The recession came when 41 raised income tax rates

Really?

Did Bush's $150 billion stimulus cheques mailed out to the minus 70K earners prevented a recession, and/or made it milder?

Well, since 1945, we had 11 recessions, on average; every 7 years, and the longest period of economic expansion lasted 10 years, from 1991 to 2001, and according to NBER, Obama's/Trump's economic expansion began on June 2009, thus, most likely.......

​

 

No, I deny the statement you made up and pretended I said. That’s called a straw man. You’ve been called on it enough times, that your are now deliberately lying about my statement.

 

It’s basic economics. Lol

 

43’s checks did very little. His tax cuts were very beneficial and resulted in the largest amount of tax revenue in any 4 year period (adjusted for inflation and population growth).

Obama’s economy was stagnant (productivity growth of only 1%). Real economic growth has just begun under the supply side economic policies of Trump.

 

You’ve been in denial this entire thread. There you go again with the mindless “demand” nonsense.

 

You got caught making **** up and pretending I said it. When you repeated the same false statement, that is a deliberate lie.

 

Too funny. You clearly confirmed the fact that economic demand is funded by production and have been denying that mindlessly ever since. Amazing.

 

Economics 101 - production funds economic demand. This has been stated in your posts multiple times.

 

Nope. This is an intentional lie, that you’ve already been called on.

 

Economic demand isn’t a word. Demand precedes production. This is in no way debatable. It’s literally the foundation of basic economics.

 

Quote: His tax cuts were very beneficial and resulted in the largest amount of tax revenue in any 4 year period (adjusted for inflation and population growth)


Yeah, but in the same time period, Bush also spent over $600 billion he received from his supplemental budget requests, and said HUGE sum of borrowed money primarily funded;

Military operations,
Maintenance
Procurements
Additional military personnel,
Military constructions
R&D
etc., etc., etc.,

Thus, did "all of the above" military spending also generated tax revenues?

If so, how much?

psst; I asked the same question in several political forums, and I never received an answer from a Republican despite the fact most Republicans believe military spending is good for the economy and an important source of jobs.

 

Those monies are transfers. You can calculate the revenues over 4 years in a $15T per year economy. It’s a rounding error. Why do you need anyone to do your work for you ??

 

More denial from someone whose own posts clearly show that production funds economic demand.

 

Too funny. Go back and learn from your posts.

 

Economic demand isn’t a word. Demand always precedes production. Basic Econ and business administration.

 

Why? I know what I typed, and so do you. You got caught lying about what I said. Lol

 

Meanwhile Trump's economy is nearing 4% growth...such good news, eh?

 

There you go again contradicting yourself.

 

You confirmed that production funds economic demand. More denial and now accusations. Too funny.

 

By proving you wrong? Lol, ok.

 

Nope, as there isn’t no such word as economic demand. I keep pointing that out, and I keep calling you on your intentional falsehood. It’s amusing watching you repeat it.