Here's another possibility a friend suggested: it's all bull-fertilizer and Phil temporarily crippled the forum himself to wow his cult followers. It's not like honestly is a priority with him or his mods. Phil's latest posts prove his rudeness has nothing to do with suspicions about a new user; he's baiting pure and simple and he knows it: "Phil Jayhan Admin Re: Opinion Requested Dave, The reason people were calling you a troll is because you were engaging in trollish behavior. Sorry. A spade is a spade. A brand new person, never before seen here, signs up for an account, so he and his arch foe and nemesis, Rtwingafraud, can now take their fight to the center of our stage here, at our forum, which is our home, and which is our research community. If you don't like the way you were treated, I suggest you change your behavior, as nobody here did anything wrong. Your one of those jerks who walks into a Crystal and China shop, bumps into a shelf, breaks something, then blames the owners for placing their item where it was. Trolls engage in the type of behavior you did. And when I saw you claim openly that you were bringing this argument from another forum to here, I should have banned you, and still will, if you so much as make one more single derogatory remark about the members or mods here. One more single fuc king derogatory remark and I will post ban your account with hope of reinstatement. You sure as hell better get over how you feel slighted here, apologize to everyone for your poor troll-like behavior and not say one more derogatory comment about a single (*)(*)(*)(*)ing person at this website, or it will be your last. Your the (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) who took an argument from another forum and brought it here. The very definition of a troll. Now stop your (*)(*)(*)(*)ing whining, and get on with your petty argument. And utter one more derogatory remark about anyone here, and it will be your last. I hope thats crystal (*)(*)(*)(*)ing clear to you bonehead. Now, if you don't like the way your being treated here, you have 2 options. 1. Leave and get the hell out. Now. 2. Build a bridge and get the (*)(*)(*)(*) over it. Cheers- phil " "One more single fuc king derogatory remark "< Oh the irony and hypocrisy.
You don't have to be crazy because I'm sane. You don't have to be crazy at all. FWIW, I don't think you're crazy. Angry, stubborn and a little paranoid maybe, but not crazy.
"We, as a group over the last 2-3 years, have solved nearly all of the most perplexing issues and inconsistencies in 9/11. We have changed the entire 9/11 paradigm and shown and proven in hundreds of different ways that the entire day of 9/11, beginning to end, is and was a hoax. We have shown and proven in dozens of different ways that even the Twin Towers were hollow, empty, gutted and without people on 9/11, essentially solving 9/11. We have shown & proven hundreds of alleged 9/11 victims to be complete frauds " I shouldn't ask...this is where madness lay...but, but..aren't there floor plans that pretty much refute "the Twin Towers were hollow, empty, gutted"?
Really? Crazy? I have a whole pile of words I would use before crazy. Most of them would get filtered.....
Why does Phil bum you out so much? Is it because you can't control his forum, and thus his words? Why would you care what Phil does over there? What's your agenda there exactly?
What haven't I answered in that forum that you want me to address? Be specific and I'll try to do better. Okay? (unless you just like spewing unchallenged rhetoric in a controlled environment). I've given up on the controlled environment myself. You ought to try it.
Ahhh yes....the obligatory "crazy" phrase has to be thrown in routinely (it's in the talking points).
Do you support the position that LRF participants have "shown & proven hundreds of alleged 9/11 victims to be complete frauds?"
Well, I don't know because I haven't researched it and I certainly don't take the word of anyone in here (no offense). I imagine that could be true though to some degree. The disinformation specialists do all they can to infiltrate and blur reasoned debate or anything this is counter to the "official" BS story. I would think that kind of forum would attract attention from these kinds of individuals, versus a more "controlled" one.
There is quite a lengthy tenant list. http://tbtf.com/unblinking/arc/2001-09a.htm Because Phil is a disgusting piece of filth who claims that even folks who DIED and their families were somehow "in on it". You don't think LRF is controlled? That's a laugh. Phil (*)(*)(*)(*) near banned you for telling the truth about how I came to be there.
You're not suppose to research truther bull(*)(*)(*)(*) because then you see just what their "truth" contains. To be a truther, you have to swallow the truther bull(*)(*)(*)(*) whole and without question. Being a truther is more like being in a cult than anything else.
Are you kidding? The ONLY reason we even know about that cult ridden cesspit is because of fans like you who told us about it! Obviously you guys wanted us to give that forum attention. Now we have. You should be happy. Stop trying to rewrite history.
Wait a minute. I just did a double take and read this again. Are you trying to say that LRF was infiltrated by "disinformation specialists" that somehow tricked the owner of the site to post disinformation because that forum is less controlled than this one? Is that the type of gullibility you would expect from the owner of a site that you called a fountain of truth?
I try to debate with them all the time over there. They don't like that so much, debate. They claim their site is a research site. It may very well be so, but it seems to also be a conclusion site. The only catch is, the only conclusions that are accepted are from the perspectives that certain individuals want to believe in. And once you start investing time into the history of Let's Roll, you will see what political people would call, "flip floppers". It is interesting to see the amount of times the powers-that-be there have gone from one agenda to another, which mind you, in a short time, they will end up debunking their former "golden tickets" and and finding their new truths. It is a cycle. I called a mod out for that process: http://letsrollforums.com/showpost.php?p=230352&postcount=16 He's the same mod that Phil had a ridiculously long flame war with. But make sure to check out their responses to me. Worth the laugh.
Maybe you shouldn't have done the double take. Sounds like you may have been closer to the correct interpretation the first time around. Quite the opposite on the controlling aspect. This is very strictly controlled, and when things get to specific, they're either muted or attacked in numbers. Preference is given to the "official" BS supporters in that degree of latitude they are granted is much less narrow. That should be obvious to anyone. Of course he could have been duped by disinfo specialists rather easily. They did it here, didn't they?
