Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Truthers and US government

Discussion in '9/11' started by AlpinLuke, May 29, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Page 4 of 5
  1. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Our local fire department has a piece of the WTC steel as a monument so, claims it was destroyed are not correct.
     
    LogicallyYours, Jun 11, 2014
    #76
  2. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Seems I remember they were donating pieces of the steel to cities who put in a request...
     
    LoneStrSt8, Jun 11, 2014
    #77
  3. ralfy

    ralfy Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    28
    According to the FEMA report referenced in the page I shared earlier, most of the steel debris was not examined. If you have a link to a report detailing how much of the debris was analyzed, please share it.
     
    ralfy, Jun 12, 2014
    #78
  4. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It wasn't at all. The most incriminating evidence was quickly carted off to Lord knows where.
     
    Stndown, Jun 12, 2014
    #79
  5. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh, and you have proof of this?
     
    LogicallyYours, Jun 12, 2014
    #80
  6. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You didn't reference a 'fema report',You referenced a truther site
     
    LoneStrSt8, Jun 12, 2014
    #81
  7. ralfy

    ralfy Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    28
    The report is linked in end note no. 9.

    The rest of the article is documented, as seen in the rest of the end notes.
     
    ralfy, Jun 13, 2014
    #82
  8. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, darn. I didn't snap a picture of the perpetrators posing for me (they were probably too busy getting rid of the evidence anyway).
     
    Stndown, Jun 13, 2014
    #83
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So once again you make a stupid claim and can produce no evidence. No one is surprised, Boss.
     
    Hannibal, Jun 13, 2014
    #84
  10. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No,It's NOT
     
    LoneStrSt8, Jun 13, 2014
    #85
  11. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There's one rub. If it's on a 'truther' site, it can't possibly be true, right? So long as it has some 'official' blessing though, or references something that aligns with an 'official' stance, it's 100% solid and unshakable fact. Glad we cleared that up!
     
    Stndown, Jun 13, 2014
    #86
  12. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You said it,not me...
     
    LoneStrSt8, Jun 13, 2014
    #87
  13. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm just verifying what I'm supposed to believe.
     
    Stndown, Jun 13, 2014
    #88
  14. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Apparently, you believe whatever you are paid to believe, Boss.
     
    Hannibal, Jun 14, 2014
    #89
  15. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think you may have it backwards. (just a theory though).
     
    Stndown, Jun 14, 2014
    #90
  16. ralfy

    ralfy Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    28
    ralfy, Jun 14, 2014
    #91
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LoneStrSt8, Jun 14, 2014
    #92
  18. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I thought you originally claimed they weren't looking for evidence of demolition. Were they, or weren't they? Did they not look, or did they look? Which is it?
     
    Stndown, Jun 17, 2014
    #93
  19. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you read their report (linked for you so you don't have to strain yourself) you'll see exactly what they did.

    Research, 'truthseeker'.
     
    Hannibal, Jun 17, 2014
    #94
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NOT what I said.
     
    LoneStrSt8, Jun 17, 2014
    #95
  21. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So, what is your position (so we can document it for later retrieval)?
     
    Stndown, Jun 17, 2014
    #96
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My postion has always been they weren't LOOKING for explosives residue,BUT that doesn't mean they wouldn't have noticed it.
     
    LoneStrSt8, Jun 17, 2014
    #97
  23. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So somebody is working at cleaning up ground zero
    spots a piece of steel with some strange looking shmutz
    on it and sounds the alarm that there is explosive residue to investigate.
    is that how its supposed to work?
     
    genericBob, Jun 17, 2014
    #98
  24. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]
     
    Jango, Jun 17, 2014
    #99
  25. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Okay so, they weren't 'looking for it', and they didn't notice any either. That about sum up your thoughts?
     
    Stndown, Jun 18, 2014
    #100
Page 4 of 5

Share This Page