UN commission says Israel committed war crimes during Gaza border protests. <<MOD WARNING>>

Again you have swallowed the creation myth, 6% of the land was bought, the rest was stolen.

 

We do know. And stop deflecting away from the theme that Israel shot at children, disabled, health workers etc.

 

I asked YOU to come up with whose army attacks disabled, health workers and children like Israel did.
And your link was clearly a link to ISIS. So YOU made that comparison happen, buddy.

the OP says Israel does exactly that. It doesn't surprise me.
The majority of them Jews support ethnic cleansing their own Arab neighbors.

 

I find it a perfectly normal thing.

 

Of course you did. It's the nature of human evolution.

The land Israel occupies was won in battle. Sucks to be the loser.

Hard fast rule of human evolution: Don't be the loser.

 

You made up that Israel attacks them, which it does not.
If they go into a combat zone, they could get hit, but that is them and not Israel.

 

It was won in Battle in 1917 and 1918 by the British and Arabs, I believe some Jews held the mules, but I cannot be sure on that.

 

So, who are those rockets targeting.
I*'ll give you a hint, not the military.

 

Please read the opening post of the thread where the UN identifies that it was a civilian political protest that the I.D.F attacked not a military one.

 

And lost in 1967. That's how it works.

And that fact forms the foundation and history of every country in the World.

 

stand your ground aint fantasy, my man... it's a law.

 

I didn't make it up... it's the topic that Israel does this. As if you did not know. And you compared those actions Israel does, with ISIS. So thanks for comparing the IDF, the fast Jewish Israeli population who joins the IDF, the Israeli government and it's voters... with ISIS.

 

No... that's not how it works with international law, that ethnic cleansers have this might is right thing.

 

No, that is why the 1967 land is occupied. That is why the Jewish State keeps the indigenous population under military control.

 

You have some fantasy of how it is used.
It only applies if you are in imminent danger, being attacked.
If the attack stops, stand your ground, is no longer valid.
If the attacker runs, it is no longer valid.
If the attacked sneaks up later on, it is no good.

 

International Law? What?

Mankind will continue to conquer the weak. Don't attack if you are weak, you will lose.

Perhaps you don't agree with human evolution. If so, I can see why you might have a problem with the results from it.

 

Ok so again we have an Israeli supporter arguing that might is right, you understand then that Palestinians cannot be terrorists since they are simply trying to get the land back that was taken from them by force. I do not believe this.

 

Did Israel occupy those lands in it's winning effort to beat back invasion during the Six Day War?

Why should they give up land they won?

Tip: Don't attack if you are weak. You will likely lose something.

 

I think the Palestinian people have been taken for a ride by corrupt terrorists who lead them.

But that is another issue. The fact is, the story of human evolution proves that the strong survive and grow, and the weak die off and get absorbed.

You want to deny the history of mankind? That would be quite something to do that.

 

Israel attacked, that is a recognised fact, they lied to the white house, the UN and everybody else.

Then why don't they annex the land and remove military law?

 

What terrorists?

 

Yeah right, they lied. I'm thinking there might be just a tad bit of bias behind that claim.

But it doesn't matter. Who won? The UAR? Syria? Jordan?

I don't think so.

Israel was stronger, and the weak lost.

The strong get to keep what they captured. That's how it always works.

 

I'm going back a ways perhaps. Yasser Arafat, etc, etc.. Terrorists.

They don't want peace, they want Israel to cease to exist. That's looney toon stuff.

Why should a stronger, better country surrender to a weaker less functional one?

The strong win. The weak don't.

It's rather simple. And the history of mankind proves it.

 

If might is right, how can they be terrorists, they are simply following the tactics that worked for the Jews against the British and Arabs?

 

Well, you have a point.

But again, winners and losers. Story of mankind.