US study lays bare extreme pay-ratio problem

What do you think starvation, when there is enough food for all, refers to? What do you think civil war (created by resource exploitation) refers to? What do you think US aggression (and its MIC) refers to?

You continue to be ignorant of basic economics.

 

now that is a sad fact!! It makes you wonder if our Founders appreciated freedom at all and whether the whole state's rights business was not just to maintain slavery.

 

you said there were capitalist disasters but are afraid to name them. What do we learn from your fear about the quality of your libcommie thinking?

 

if the libcommie has evidence I will pay him $10,000. Bet or run away yet again?

 

Already named three (which refer to multiple countries). Put more effort in your reading. Using the term libcommie, mind you, demonstrates a cretinous outlook

 

You're backtracking on your celebration of China? Did Trump help you there? Big bad China invented global warming just to annoy you and your mate Billy Bob?

 

name most obvious one?? Why is libcommie so afraid??

 

you said you were a non free market socialist or libcommie right?? Maybe you are a statest statest or socialist communist??

 

This is a cretinous response. Check out the three provided and try and provide an economic rebuke (I don't expect one)

 

Anyone using the term libcommie is, by definition, spewing cluelessness.

 

????

 

That's probably your most intelligent reply. Says a lot.

 

Still parroting that ludicrous canard that you cannot substantiate?

 

The historical records shows that it was succeeding so well that a coup needed to be enacted by right wing authoritarians in order to preserve their privilege.

 

can you tell us what canard you are talking about? And tell us the essence of debate between between Federalists and Anti Federalists?

 

Sadly true, the central aspect of the coup was the lie that the new Constitution would not result in a appreciably expanded central govt.

 

translation: As typical liberal I lost debate so I'll post picture pretending it has deep meaning

 

Wrong of course both liberals and commies and monarchists are statests made illegal here thanks to our genius founders
anti statest Constitution. Now do you understand?

 

You continue to make absolutely no sense. A good advert for fake libertarianism mind you

 

you mean you lack IQ to understand why Constitution made liberal communist and monarchial statism illegal??

 

Liberalism and communism are, by definition, mutually exclusive. It is cretinous to suggest otherwise.

 

liberalism communism and monarchy Fabianism are identical because they are statist. Now do you understand?

 

Fake? How so?

 

Again, your binary outlook is itself classic authoritarian personality territory.

Your lack of understanding of political economy is extreme.