Vaporize the Kaaba to reduce potential # of Jihadist recruits?

yawn.............

 

You do that and you are no different than them. Yawn all you want to, but im not standing by killing innocent people on purpose to sniff victory. Only cowards wish to kill innocents to prove a point.

Be a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing man and take the fight to those who are asking for it.

 

It may be at the moment a sick suggestion. But the more that the Muslims attack us, the more reasonable a suggestion it becomes. President Trump should consider the viability of the OP's proposal.

I voted "more yes than no", but we also need to think about viable targets in Iran too.

 

That is what I said I wanted to do, but reading comprehension is not coming off as one of your stronger skills. I do not now or ever did promote the bombing of Mecca. I told you that, in English no less, but it meant nothing to you. You feel comfortable flourishing in your prose flavored by your anger and superiority . This is your stage, your show, I predict you'll have what you consider to be a righteous reply. I'm holding my breath in anticipation.

Happy Easter.

 

What about if we are in a world war, such as say the Nazi's enemy's (WWII) #1 main headquarters? If you'd do that, then blowing up our enemy's #1 main building in THIS world war (WWIII) makes just as much sense. It's almost like if the Nazis claimed to know where you go when you die, i.e. because a religion, that people would all of a sudden give Nazism more credit, and tread lightly on it! Insane.

 

Clear out the Kaaba with tear gas, THEN bomb it.....how about that proposal?

 

No, use "conventional" weapons, no nukes - can still vaporize it.

 

No, just the Kaaba. The Qur'an gives an example of Allah protecting it, so if we show that Allah is weak, it should reduce their Islamic zeal, and of course reduce the number of potential recruits that the enemy has (they have 1.5 billion now, and we need to reduce that number, of course.)

- - - Updated - - -

Well then, uh, just keep our wives and children away from airports and train stations and (like in Belgium) they would have been just fine!

- - - Updated - - -

The Qur'an says to fight us "until all worship is for Allah" (and since obviously if it hasn't ended in 1400 years so far), so it's not going to end until Islam ends.

 

Hey I born barely 2 years after the A-bombs were dropped on Japan so while I was growing up that was recent history hardly in books yet. My dad made me listen to President Eisenhower's speeches and he gave me a big world map to use when playing with my toy soldiers and tanks. I learned more about geography and history from my dad then from school. When he was studying for his Citizenship Naturalization test he made me read the books with him and ask him the questions so he wouldn't miss any questions. He used to tell my Mom that I will be a General some day. Well i am a failure I only made it to Sergeant.

But is is sad that there are so many Americans born and raised here who do not know our history....

 

you are NOT a failure Sarg

 

Who bombed Iraq and Syria? Here's a hint.. It wasn't Iran or Saudi Arabia,

 

Well again considering the fact the Kaaba is dead center of Mecca, yes we will in fact be "vaporizing" Mecca. You did not make a very distinct target when talking about bombing so I figured you meant the literal center of Mecca as a preferred target of yours. It has nothing to do with superiority, and everything to do with not being like them and killing innocent people and purposely paving a pool of blood and creating an even worse scenario than we have now.

I am all for going hard on ISIS and other terror groups, just not by purposely making innocent people targets and in turn creating a worse situation for our innocent. Now if that is what you mean, then we are good.

Happy Easter to you too.

- - - Updated - - -

You mean just destroy the holy site?

You will create the same thing, you realize these radicals hold their religion higher than human life correct?

 

That will not sway them, just really make them angry and increase their numbers.

Dude seriously, these are people that will bomb buildings and go on shooting sprees because somebody simply drew a cartoon of Mohammed. You blow up the most sacred mosque and they really going to go off.

 

That's insane of them - no wonder we are in an endless war with Islam, with no end in sight! That makes Islam an extremist ideology.

- - - Updated - - -

So never fight back, eh? Might as well surrender ASAP, eh? Never violate Islamic law by drawing Mohammad ever again, eh?

 

For the last 7 years it's been....Barack Obomba!

Obomba has been King of the Drones, likely having dropped more drone strikes than anyone in history, actually. Yemen, Somalia, Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, etc. He's too cowardly to even ATTEMPT to take on the Jihad ideologically, because that would upset Christians because a part of that battle would of course be an attempt to discredit faith itself - since faith is what gets Muslims to believe insane stuff like they get 72 virgins when they blow themselves up killing infidels - no evidence, just faith. Faith is the underlying enemy.

 

Lol come on man lets be real here. There is a difference in drawing cartoons about their pedophile prophet and going in to destroy their most holy site.

You destroy Kaaba then they will go after things like the Vatican and the thousands that visit or live near it, not to mention the bombings across the globe and the true unrest it will create.

We have to be smarter. You want to put fear into Islamic radicals, not give them an even much greater reason to be pissed off and at the same time create the ultimate recruiting tool and creating more victims than you would be helping.

I am one who believes to achieve fear in the hearts of radicals we have to get truly nasty ON THEM, not on innocent people. We don't go in to destroy what they cherish, we go in to destroy radicals.

Did you hear about the bombing in Pakistan today, mostly christian women and children were killed. WHat do you think happens to other christians in those countries when you attack all of Islam in such a way?

Yes I am saying we fight back, harsh and fast, but there are better ways.

 

We are good.

 

And then we lose Saudi as an ally, they go nuclear, and threaten that if we bomb Mecca, they'll annihilate NYC.

 

This will probably all end worse than WWII did, with more dead, in the long run.

 

On what exactly are you basing this claim?

 

20% of all humanity follows the enemy belief system, unlike WWII, they can get nukes easier today, it's been going on for 1400 years, and the enemy lives among us (not just far away in Berlin.)

 

Why are you making the false assumption that all conflict involving Muslims is a single conflict?

 

Much of it is Islamic Jihad against those who are non-believers, yes. Muslims rarely wage Jihad to instill democracies, kill to install a democracy, they usually kill to install Sharia Law, like the Qur'an says to do.

 

If it is decided that the Kaba is a clear and present danger, then it becomes a legitimate military target.

There are probably better targets in Iran.

 

Would you approve of a Final Solution to the jihadists problem?