[video=youtube;a3tfa2VFJgo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3tfa2VFJgo&feature=player_embedded[/video]
Great reminder Obama is Pro-Live and that children are living breathing children not potential future children
If Obama was pro life he could surely convince most Americans to the pro life side. He can make excellent speeches
Hmm if he were pro-life? Well let's see...wouldn't vote for him. And even though he's pro-choice, still didn't vote for him.
Your kind would vote for nearly any candidate, if they were the only one that supported "a woman's right".
Obama is pro-life, but Obama also believes it's not the government place to force women to abort or carry a pregnancy to term, most Americans agree with this stance on the issue .
But Obama believes it's the government's place to force people to buy health insurance, and to decide which lightbulbs can be made.
Most people believe in life, but only right-wing Americans believe in turning women into brood-mares to suit their masculine need to bully. What you mean is, 'What if our President shared our sick, mothersboys' desire to enslave women to prove we are male?'
obama doesnt even want babies born from failed abortions to get medical attention to save their lives. he wants them to die. so dont say he's pro life. he's pro wanted life
My kind? What exactly is mind 'kind'? I am actually a strong Ron Paul supporter and I know full well of his OB/GYN history and his pro-life beliefs. While I am strongly pro-choice I don't base my personal votes on that sole issue either. That would be counter-productive and most people know this. Anyways, all you have to do is ask what I believe and who I would vote for rather than sit here and make assumptions about what you think my 'kind' would vote for. It's really not that hard. Do you see me assuming that you must have voted for Romney because he is pro-life? No, of course not. I saw your thread against Romney and I remember that you dislike him so there is no reason to assume that you voted for him. I will ask, who did you vote for, or who would you have voted for, I realize you are Scandinavia, correct? Did you or would you vote solely based on whether the candidate was pro-life?
Actually his stance on the Born Alive legislation is really open to interpretation if you want to read in full detail what he said about it here. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...852895a-f87d-11e1-8398-0327ab83ab91_blog.html
"Potential future children?" Unreal. Do you hear the language you use to dehumanize people? Do you realize that your party used to talk the same way about "darkies" back in the 1800s? You people never change.
He states that there is already a law to provide life saving medical attention to infants. Why would they need another bill to state this same thing?
now think about it. how much sense does it make that they would try to pass legislation that has already been passed? come on I know your smarter than this. on partial birth abortions he said he voted against it because "health" of the mother was not included
You're right, they just wanted to pass legislation that would give a fetus personhood and deem abortion illegal including in life saving situations. Thanks for helping me realize that!
