What if the AJC hadn't declared war on Germany in 1933?

It's very clearly written in post #73. Do I have to spoon feed it to you? Ok. I'll spoon feed it to you. Here it is.

Please comment on the big lie that Americans are taught that I pointed out above.

 

What if the AJC hadn't declared war on Germany in 1933?

Simple really; there would have been no need to inter the Jews, the deportations to Palestine, and Madagascar would have proceeded in an orderly fashion. German credit for the purchase of agricultural/Industrial equipment would have been unimpeded. Today, Palestine, and Madagascar would probably be German Protectorates. Hitler would have won the war against Bolshevik/Jewish Zionism in Russia; no Korean war, no Vietnam, no Middle East wars, no European Union, no multi-culturalisim, no blood sucking of other nations; you name it. Historical "what ifs" can be a lot of fun. The reality of course is far different; a lot like asking ticks to stop sucking blood.

 

Provide your contention, provide the quote that supports it, post the link and where exactly on the video that quote is. Throwing out a bunch of youtube vids and saying they tell me things if I am willing to watch for hours is pretty lame.

 

[QUOT ....

 

Give specific phrase in Mein Kampf, which was "Manipulated".

/

 

Nope it was Mel Gibson.

 

You're playing dumb because you'd rather not address the issue. The written part explains it all.

Anyway, if you're going to be against something, you should know what it is. You should listen to those two speeches of Hitler's.

Here's some stuff you should watch if you want to understand the revisionist position.

Hitler's War - What the Historians Neglect to Mention
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0E_Ewe8g2Y

Hitler Saved Europe From Stalin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtpHHQUtaeM

Auschwitz - Why The Gas Chambers Are A Myth - HD (full) (English Subtitles)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE56dcgGVMs


Check out the info in this site.

http://nazigassings.com/
(excerpt)
---------------------------------
There are NO photographs of corpses of Nazi gassing victims. The cheap, dirty trick which really makes the hoax succeed is the wilful misuse of pictures of countless sick and dead in the camps at the end of the war—none of which are of people killed in gas chambers—but which are repeatedly shown to give the false impression that millions of people must have been murdered in gas chambers. There really is no direct connection--but for the more than gullible masses, the connection is “undeniable.” The people who show those pictures are all in on the trick. They all know perfectly well that the pictures are of people who died of other causes such as typhus—but they use the pictures anyway for their powerful psychological effect to precondition their audience for the gassing and mass extermination pitch which inevitably follows. The pictures are irrelevant except for their enormous shock value. Pictures of countless healthy prisoners in the same camps are generally not shown for reasons that are all too obvious. This delibeerate misuse of photographs is rather widespread and illustrates the collective eagerness of many people (the “hoaxers“ or co-conspirators in the hoax), especially in the American media, to throw whatever they can find against the Nazis, SS and Germans generally just like spiteful children. They want to believe in the hoax.
----------------------------------


If you're going to be against the revisionist position, you should know what it is.

 

Quote what you want to say and provide the link and where it is at. Hours of video are not proof of anything except what has been warping your mind.

Which part of his speeches? POrovide the quote that supports whatever it is you are trying to say and then p[rovide what time it is on the video so I don't have to wade through hours of garbage to find it. If you don't know what he said or exactly where he said it don't expect me to do your work for you.

More non peer reviewed clap trap. I could counter and post youtube links to Schindler list etc but that is similar fiction to what you post.

Three and a half hours I'm supposed to sit through because you told me there is something there. Hell, I don't even know what your contention is much less what it is you are trying to show proving it nor am I willing to sit through this to guess.

Don't need to, Denialists have been beaten in court time and time again and the Holocaust is an established historical fact. You can read the particulars here.

 

Whose court might that be? The Zionist controlled courts of Europe where even the attempt to present evidence dis-proving the Holocaust is a criminal offense, punishable by 5 years in prison, and heavy fines. The Holocaust is an established fraud instigated by Zionist/Bolshevik Jews, and nothing more. You really need to get some new material.

 

Nope. One was where the Holocaust Denier took the other to trial and, he was, like the IHR case, able to provide all the evidence he wished. Sort of shoots your point down in spades but you're used to it I'm sure.

 

Your talking about Canada, it is illegal in Europe. Canada is not part of Europe.

Austria
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Czech Republic
France
Germany
Hungary
Israel
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
The Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Spain
Switzerland
and the European Union ..... The European Union's executive Commission proposed a European Union wide anti-racism xenophobia law in 2001, which included the criminalization of Holocaust denial.

Try putting on a defense concerning the facts in those country's, you WILL go to prison. Once again it's illegal. https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100417101537AALfvx9

 

Talking about Britain and the US. The Holocaust Deniers brought their full deck and lost both times.

 

I have no knowledge of "Holocaust Trials" in the US, or Britain, please provide links for study.

 

Yup! Inconvenient, yet true.

 

considering that nazi lovers and jew haters haven't come up with any new material in decades, your own suggestion of new material should be taken to heart.

hate crime are hate crimes. You might note that those nations with specific laws regarding the holocaust are the same nations that suffered the most under the nazi bootheels.
Of course its all an evil jew zionist bolshevik plot in your book, but it seems your book was written by a bunch of crackpots, amateurs and professional haters.

Revisionists all follow the same song sheet and you are acting in true form.

http://www.jewishgen.org/ForgottenCamps/Exhib/HowtoEngl.html

 

What year was mein kampf written in?

Hitler's agenda wrt the jews was already well established by the time he became chancellor. A completely ineffective publicity stunt by a hated jew (and zionist) would have had no impact on his philosophy or plans.

Its an idiotic supposition that only finds traction with deniers and jew haters since the enormity of surrounding evidence makes it pretty damn clear that a demand for an economic boycott (funny name for a war, isn't it) from a relatively inconsequential jew in America had no effect on the regime, other than being a useful bit of jew hating propaganda.

 

No he was referring to Irvings trial in london.

Zundel's trial in Canada was under our existing hate crimes law. and that law doesn't mention a damn thing about the holocaust.

BTW zundel got convicted twice, but he won his Supreme court appeal since the "spreading of false news" part of the law was deemed unconstitutional. We threw his arse out anyway.

It was zundel who commissioned leuchter (mr. death) and his infamously ridiculous, quack scientific report.

 

Already did post 83. It's a thousand pages or thereabouts.